Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bowers, J. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Bowers, J. S..

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Factorization and spatial encodings: a hypothesis about the foundations of the genomic code

The genomic mechanisms that efficiently encode the initial architecture and synaptic connectivity of neural circuits remain poorly understood. We hypothesise that two primary mechanisms -- spatial encoding and factorisation -- enable a limited genome to initialise networks of billions of neurons. Spatial encoding, a form of indirect representation, compresses neural network parameters while enforcing structural continuity. Complementarily, we introduce a factorisation mechanism inspired by reaction-diffusion models, comprising a spatially invariant reaction rule and spatially variant diffusion dynamics. Based on this insight, we can efficiently abstract a neural network layer as a spatially invariant weight kernel (or filter) and its spatially variant transformations along the spatial dimensions. Thus, coupling this variant-invariant decomposition with spatial encodings can substantially reduce the size of the solution space explored by the genome. In addition, we show that this coupling leads to efficient initialisation of cortical maps, such as V1 orientation maps, and neural networks with the ability to generalise. In summary, coupling factorisation and spatial encodings can offer functional advantages to the evolving genome.

neuroscience↗

The role of capacity constraints in Convolutional Neural Networks for learning random versus natural data

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are often described as promising models of human vision, yet they show many differences from human abilities. We focus on a superhuman capacity of top-performing CNNs, namely, their ability to learn very large datasets of random patterns. We verify that human learning on such tasks is extremely limited, even with few stimuli. We argue that the performance difference is due to CNNs overcapacity and introduce biologically inspired mechanisms to constrain it, while retaining the good test set generalisation to structured images as characteristic of CNNs. We investigate the efficacy of adding noise to hidden units activations, restricting early convolutional layers with a bottleneck, and using a bounded activation function. Internal noise was the most potent intervention and the only one which, by itself, could reduce random data performance in the tested models to chance levels. We also investigated whether networks with biologically inspired capacity constraints show improved generalisation to out-of-distribution stimuli, however little benefit was observed. Our results suggest that constraining networks with biologically motivated mechanisms paves the way for closer correspondence between network and human performance, but the few manipulations we have tested are only a small step towards that goal.

neuroscience↗

The contrasting shape representations that support object recognition in humans and CNNs

Humans are particularly sensitive to changes in the relationships between parts of objects. It remains unclear why this is. One hypothesis is that relational features are highly diagnostic of object categories and emerge as a result of learning to classify objects. We tested this by analysing the internal representations of supervised convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained to classify large sets of objects. We found that CNNs do not show the same sensitivity to relational changes as previously observed for human participants. Furthermore, when we precisely controlled the deformations to objects, human behaviour was best predicted by the amount of relational changes while CNNs were equally sensitive to all changes. Even changing the statistics of the learning environment by making relations uniquely diagnostic did not make networks more sensitive to relations in general. Our results show that learning to classify objects is not sufficient for the emergence of human shape representations.

neuroscience↗

Feature blindness: a challenge for understanding and modelling visual object recognition

Humans rely heavily on the shape of objects to recognise them. Recently, it has been argued that Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) can also show a shape-bias, provided their learning environment contains this bias. This has led to the proposal that CNNs provide good mechanistic models of shape-bias and, more generally, human visual processing. However, it is also possible that humans and CNNs show a shape-bias for very different reasons, namely, shape-bias in humans may be a consequence of architectural and cognitive constraints whereas CNNs show a shape-bias as a consequence of learning the statistics of the environment. We investigated this question by exploring shape-bias in humans and CNNs when they learn in a novel environment. We observed that, in this new environment, humans (i) focused on shape and overlooked many non-shape features, even when non-shape features were more diagnostic, (ii) learned based on only one out of multiple predictive features, and (iii) failed to learn when global features, such as shape, were absent. This behaviour contrasted with the predictions of a statistical inference model with no priors, showing the strong role that shape-bias plays in human feature selection. It also contrasted with CNNs that (i) preferred to categorise objects based on non-shape features, and (ii) increased reliance on these non-shape features as they became more predictive. This was the case even when the CNN was pre-trained to have a shape-bias and the convolutional backbone was frozen. These results suggest that shape-bias has a different source in humans and CNNs: while learning in CNNs is driven by the statistical properties of the environment, humans are highly constrained by their previous biases, which suggests that cognitive constraints play a key role in how humans learn to recognise novel objects. Author summaryAny object consists of hundreds of visual features that can be used to recognise it. How do humans select which feature to use? Do we always choose features that are best at predicting the object? In a series of experiments using carefully designed stimuli, we find that humans frequently ignore many features that are clearly visible and highly predictive. This behaviour is statistically inefficient and we show that it contrasts with statistical inference models such as state-of-the-art neural networks. Unlike humans, these models learn to rely on the most predictive feature when trained on the same data. We argue that the reason underlying human behaviour may be a bias to look for features that are less hungry for cognitive resources and generalise better to novel instances. Models that incorporate cognitive constraints may not only allow us to better understand human vision but also help us develop machine learning models that are more robust to changes in incidental features of objects.

neuroscience↗

Can Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Learn Same-Different Relations?

Same-different visual reasoning is a basic skill central to abstract combinatorial thought. This fact has lead neural networks researchers to test same-different classification on deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs), which has resulted in a controversy regarding whether this skill is within the capacity of these models. However, most tests of same-different classification rely on testing on images that come from the same pixel-level distribution as the testing images, yielding the results inconclusive. In this study we tested relational same-different reasoning DCNNs. In a series of simulations we show that DCNNs are capable of visual same-different classification, but only when the test images are similar to the training images at the pixel-level. In contrast, even when there are only subtle differences between the testing and training images, the performance of DCNNs could drop to chance levels. This is true even when DCNNs training regime included a wide distribution of images or when they were trained in a multi-task setup in which training included an additional relational task with test images from the same pixel-level distribution.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Biological convolutions improve DNN robustness to noise and generalisation

Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DNNs) have achieved superhuman accuracy on standard image classification benchmarks. Their success has reignited significant interest in their use as models of the primate visual system, bolstered by claims of their architectural and representational similarities. However, closer scrutiny of these models suggests that they rely on various forms of shortcut learning to achieve their impressive performance, such as using texture rather than shape information. Such superficial solutions to image recognition have been shown to make DNNs brittle in the face of more challenging tests such as noise-perturbed or out-of-domain images, casting doubt on their similarity to their biological counterparts. In the present work, we demonstrate that adding fixed biological filter banks, in particular banks of Gabor filters, helps to constrain the networks to avoid reliance on shortcuts, making them develop more structured internal representations and more tolerant to noise. Importantly, they also gained around 20 35% improved accuracy when generalising to our novel out-of-domain test image sets over standard end-to-end trained architectures. We take these findings to suggest that these properties of the primate visual system should be incorporated into DNNs to make them more able to cope with real-world vision and better capture some of the more impressive aspects of human visual perception such as generalisation.

neuroscience↗

Identification of human CD4+ T cell populations with distinct antitumor activity

How naturally arising human CD4+ T helper subsets impact tumor immunity is unknown. We reported that human CD4+CD26high T cells elicit potent immunity against solid tumor malignancies. As CD26high T cells secrete type-17 cytokines and have been categorized as Th17 cells, we posited these helper populations would possess similar molecular properties. Herein, we reveal that CD26high T cells are epigenetically and transcriptionally distinct from Th17 cells. Of clinical significance, CD26high T cells engineered with a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) ablated large human tumors to a greater extent than enriched Th17, Th1, or Th2 cells. Moreover, CD26high T cells mediated curative responses in mice, even when redirected with a suboptimal CAR and without the aid of CD8+ CAR T cells. CD26high T cells co-secreted effector cytokines at heightened levels and robustly persisted. Collectively, our work reveals the potential of human CD4+ T cell populations to improve durability of solid tumor therapies.

immunology↗

PI3Kδ inhibition supports memory T cells with enhanced antitumor fitness

Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase p110{delta} (PI3K{delta}) inhibition by Idelalisib (CAL-101) in hematological malignancies directly induces apoptosis in cancer cells and disrupts immunological tolerance by depleting regulatory T cells (Tregs). Yet, little is known about the direct impact of PI3K{delta} blockade on effector T cells from CAL-101 therapy. Herein, we demonstrate a direct effect of p110{delta} inactivation via CAL-101 on murine and human CD8+ T cells that promotes a strong undifferentiated memory phenotype (elevated CD62L/CCR7, CD127 and Tcf7). These CAL-101 T cells also persisted longer after transfer and exerted stronger antitumor immunity compared to traditionally expanded CD8+ T cells in two solid tumor models. Thus, this report describes a novel direct enhancement of CD8+ T cell memory by a p110{delta} inhibitor that leads to markedly improved tumor regression. This finding has significant implications to improve outcomes from next generation cancer immunotherapies.\n\nHighlightsO_LIIn vitro blockade of PI3K p110{delta} with CAL-101 endows antitumor T cells with a stronger memory phenotype than those treated with AKTi\nC_LIO_LIThe strong memory phenotype of CAL-101 treated cells translates into improved survival of mice bearing aggressive tumors after adoptive transfer of these T cells\nC_LIO_LIHuman CAR engineered T cells treated with CAL-101 possess an enhanced memory phenotype and robust antitumor efficacy\nC_LIO_LIThe antitumor efficacy of CAL-101 primed T cells is not mediated by high CD62L or CD127 expression, but is likely driven by their stem memory phenotype\nC_LI\n\neTOC BlurbBowers et al report a novel function of PI3K blockade using the p110{delta} subunit inhibitor CAL-101 to induce memory and antitumor potency in CD8+ T cells. Ex vivo treatment of T cells with CAL-101 leads to improved antitumor control and subject survival in both murine transgenic T cell and human CAR T cell models.

cancer biology↗