Biology subjects

Bova, A. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Bova, A. S..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Dorsomedial striatal dopamine ramps down during interval timing

Dopamine is involved in disorders that degrade cognition such as Parkinsons disease, ADHD, addiction, and schizophrenia; however, it is unclear how dopamine modulates brain circuits involved in cognitive processing. We investigated this problem by recording dopamine during interval timing, an elementary task that requires executive functions to estimate an interval of several seconds by making a motor response. We harnessed the fluorescent dopamine sensor dLight1.3b to record relative dopamine dynamics in the mouse dorsomedial striatum, which integrates information from cognitive cortical circuits and is required for interval timing. We found that: 1) dopamine activity ramped down during interval timing prior to increasing at reward delivery; 2) dopamine ramping dynamics predicted interval timing behavior; and 3) dopamine ramping dynamics were distinct between male and female mice and affected by amphetamine, a potent modulator of dopamine. These data provide insight into how dopamine modulates striatal circuits during interval timing and help better understand how dopamine dynamics contribute to cognitive dysfunction in dopamine-related brain diseases.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2026

Neuronal ramping and theta power during freely-moving and head-fixed mouse interval timing.

An important paradigm to study executive function is interval timing, which requires participants to estimate a temporal interval, often with a motor response. Interval timing translates from rodents to humans and can model neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disease. Interval timing also has parallel, time-dependent neurophysiology in rodents and humans, including time-dependent linear changes in neuronal firing rates over a temporal interval (ramping activity) and low-frequency [~]4 Hz "theta" activity evoked by trial start and response. Despite these translational features, an important confound of interval timing is movement and motor preparation, as participants must report their estimates by planning a movement. To address this confound, we first trained a group of 7 mice in a freely-moving interval timing task in which mice had to move across an operant chamber and nosepoke at the correct time to receive food reward. These mice were then trained in a head-fixed version of interval timing in which mice receive liquid reward for holding still for 3 seconds at the correct location, with reward access randomized to probe interval timing behavior. Despite vastly different motor sequences, we found prominent ramping activity in mouse prefrontal cortex ensembles and prefrontal cortical [~]4 Hz activity evoked both by trial start and preceding the timed decision. These data provide evidence that prefrontal neuronal ramping and theta activity is not linked to a specific motor program but rather a feature of the temporal organization of behavior.

animal behavior and cognition↗

bioRxiv2025

Diverse activity in prefrontal projections promotes temporal control of action

Prefrontal neurons can have diverse activity during cognitive functions like working memory, attention, and timing; however, the importance of this heterogeneity is unclear. Our goal was to better understand the diversity of prefrontal activity through connectivity. We harnessed circuit-specific tools to capture activity within prefrontal projections during interval timing, an elementary cognitive process that requires working memory for temporal rules and attention to the passage of time to estimate a temporal interval of several seconds. We used human electroencephalography and single neuronal recordings in mice to capture prefrontal activity during interval timing, with major patterns characterized by time-dependent ramping (monotonic changes) over a temporal interval. We then leveraged retrograde viruses to interrogate prefrontal cortex (PFC) projections to the mediodorsal thalamus (PFC-MD) and to the dorsomedial striatum (PFC-DMS). We report three novel results. First, circuit-specific calcium fiber photometry revealed that PFC-MD and PFC-DMS activity encoded distinct temporal signals, with PFC-MD projections ramping down and PFC-DMS ramping up to interval timing response times. Second, circuit-specific inactivation revealed that PFC-DMS inactivation disrupted animals internal estimates of time. Third, circuit-specific single-nucleus RNA sequencing of prefrontal projections revealed distinct transcriptomic profiles between PFC-MD and PFC-DMS projections, with enriched genes for cortical layers and neuromodulators, and specific genes such as Cux2, Camk2n1, Htr4, and Foxp2. These data suggest differences in gene expression and connectivity give rise to the diversity of prefrontal activity during interval timing. These findings advance our fundamental understanding of prefrontal function and dysfunction in human disease.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Amphetamine increases timing variability by degrading prefrontal ramping activity

BackgroundAmphetamine is a commonly abused psychostimulant that increases synaptic catecholamine levels and impairs executive functions. However, it is unknown how acute amphetamine affects brain areas involved in executive control, such as the prefrontal cortex. We studied this problem in mice using interval timing, which requires participants to estimate an interval of several seconds with a motor response. Rodent prefrontal cortex ensembles are required for interval timing. We tested the hypothesis that amphetamine disrupts interval timing by degrading prefrontal cortex temporal encoding. MethodsWe first quantified the effects of amphetamine on interval timing performance by conducting a meta-analysis of 11 prior rodent studies. We also implanted multielectrode recording arrays in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex of 7 mice and then examined the effects of 1.5 mg/kg D-amphetamine injected intraperitoneally on interval timing behavior and prefrontal neuronal ensemble activity. ResultsA meta-analysis of previous literature revealed that amphetamine produces a large effect size on interval timing variability across studies but only a medium effect size on central tendencies of interval timing. We found a similar effect on interval timing variability in our task, which was accompanied by greater trial-to-trial variability in prefrontal ramping, attenuated interactions between pairs of ramping neurons, and dampened low-frequency oscillations. ConclusionsThese findings suggest that amphetamine alters prefrontal temporal processing by increasing the variability of prefrontal ramping. Our work provides insight into how amphetamine affects timing-related brain activity, which may be useful in developing new neurophysiological markers for amphetamine use and novel treatments targeting the prefrontal cortex.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Sex similarities and dopaminergic differences in interval timing

Rodent behavioral studies have largely focused on male animals, which has limited the generalizability and conclusions of neuroscience research. Working with humans and rodents, we studied sex effects during interval timing that requires participants to estimate an interval of several seconds by making motor responses. Interval timing requires attention to the passage of time and working memory for temporal rules. We found no differences between human females and males in interval timing response times (timing accuracy) or the coefficient of variance of response times (timing precision). Consistent with prior work, we also found no differences between female and male rodents in timing accuracy or precision. In female rodents, there was no difference in interval timing between estrus and diestrus cycle stages. Because dopamine powerfully affects interval timing, we also examined sex differences with drugs targeting dopaminergic receptors. In both female and male rodents, interval timing was delayed after administration of sulpiride (D2-receptor antagonist), quinpirole (D2-receptor agonist), and SCH-23390 (D1-receptor antagonist). By contrast, after administration of SKF-81297 (D1-receptor agonist), interval timing shifted earlier only in male rodents. These data illuminate sex similarities and differences in interval timing. Our results have relevance for rodent models of both cognitive function and brain disease by increasing represenation in behavioral neuroscience.

neuroscience↗