Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Boudry, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Boudry, G..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

The gut insulin receptor acts as gatekeeper of intestinal barrier integrity

An impaired gut barrier has emerged as a potential driver of the low-grade inflammation that accompanies obesity and its complications. Among these, hyperglycemia per se has been proposed to sustain such increased intestinal permeability and subsequent translocation of bacterial endotoxins in the systemic circulation. Because reduced insulin signaling in the gut epithelium has also been reported upon obese conditions, we hypothesized that, beyond hyperglycemia, defective intestinal insulin signaling could directly compromise epithelial integrity. To mimic this diabesity feature, we induced deletion of the insulin receptor (IR) in the adult gut epithelium of IR{Delta}GUT mice. Remarkably, gut IR loss persistently maintained normal body weight and glucose homeostasis, thereby allowing the specific role of insulin action to be investigated. While IR{Delta}GUT mice exhibited increased intestinal paracellular permeability, mechanistic characterization of this gut leakiness revealed that IR{Delta}GUT mice displayed a rapid and drastic decline in Paneth cells anti-microbial defenses. This paralleled the onset of a cecal dysbiosis, as characterized by increased abundance of Pseudomonadota, and enhanced microbiota encroachment. Of note, IR{Delta}GUT mice exhibited intestinal stem cell (ISC) defects, as evidenced by reduced expression of ISC markers and ISC-mediated growth of intestinal organoids. Although expression of niche factors such as Wnt3a was diminished in Paneth cells isolated from IR{Delta}GUT mice, pharmacological activation of the canonical Wnt pathway failed to rescue the growth defects of IR-deleted gut organoids. The direct contribution of IR-downstream signaling to ISCs homeostasis was confirmed by the transcriptional reprogramming of FACS-sorted ISCs from IR{Delta}ISC mice. Finally, while gut IR loss did not worsen endotoxemia or impaired glycemic control upon HFD-feeding, IR{Delta}GUT displayed a higher susceptibility to chemically induced colitis and enteric infections (S. typhimurium, C. rodentium), underscoring intestinal insulin signaling as a key determinant of barrier integrity and epithelial homeostasis.

physiology↗

Yo-yo dieting deregulates feeding behavior in mice via the induction of durable gut dysbiosis

Background & AimsAlternating periods of excessive and restrained eating results in weight cycling, a known risk factor for eating behavior dysregulation such as binge eating. Diet alternation also induces changes in intestinal microbiota composition. We tested the hypothesis that recurrent diet alternation alters hedonic feeding regulation by changing either or both intestinal microbiota and brain homeostasis in mouse. MethodsC57BL/6 mice underwent 3 cycles of 1 week of western diet (WD, 45% kcal from fat) separated by 2 weeks of chow diet (CYCL group) or staid under chow diet (CTRL group). Food intake was monitored after each dietary change. Striatum, hypothalamus, brainstem and caecal content were collected before the third WD introduction in CYCL mice and in CTRL mice. Microbiota transfer from CYCL or CTRL mice into naive recipient mice was performed to investigate whether gut microbiota per se could explain differences in eating behavior during weight cycling. ResultsDiet alternation in CYCL mice resulted in weight cycling, with enhanced weight gain upon each WD feeding phase. CYCL mice increased their energy intake specifically during the first hours following WD re-introduction, reminiscent of binge-eating episodes. Expression of reward-related genes in the striatum and thickness of the astro-glial barrier in the brain stem were enhanced in CYCL compared to CTRL mice. Diet alternation also induced caecal dysbiosis in CYCL mice. Gut microbiota transfer from CYCL mice to naive recipient mice recapitulated the altered eating behavior upon WD exposure. ConclusionsAlternation between high-energy and standard diet durably remodels the gut microbiota and the brain towards a profile associated with an increase in hedonic appetite. Using gut microbiota transfer, we established that this microbiota signature affects hedonic feeding regulation. These results open the ways to microbiota-targeted strategies to prevent development of eating disorders in weight cycling patients.

physiology↗

Initial pig developmental stage influences intestinal organoid growth but not phenotype

Intestinal organoids are promising tools in the context of animal experiment reduction. Yet, a thorough characterization of the impact of the origin of intestinal stem cells (ISC) on organoid phenotype is needed to routinely use this cellular model. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of ISC donor age on the growth, morphology and cellular composition of intestinal organoids derived from pig, a valuable model of Humans. Organoids were derived from jejunal and colonic ISC obtained from 1, 7, 28, 36 and 180-day old pigs and passaged three times. We first confirmed by qPCR that the expression of 18% of the >80 studied genes related to various intestinal functions differed between jejunal and colonic organoids after two passages (P<0.05). Growth and morphology of organoids depended on intestinal location (greater number and larger organoids derived from colonic than jejunal ISC, P<0.05) but also pig age. Indeed, when ISC were derived from young piglets, the ratio of organoids to spheroids was greater (P<0.05), spheroids were larger during the primary culture but smaller after two passages (P<0.05) and organoids smaller after one passage (P>0.05) compared to ISC from older pigs. Finally, no difference in cellular composition, evaluated by immunostaining of markers of the major intestinal cell types (absorptive, enteroendocrine and goblet cells) were observed between organoids originating from 7 or 180-day old pigs, while difference between intestinal site origin were noticed. In conclusion, while the age of the tissue donor affected organoid growth and morphology, it did not influence their phenotype.

physiology↗