Biology subjects

Borycz, J. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Borycz, J. A..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2021

Presynaptic Mitochondrial Volume and Density Scale with Presynaptic Power Demand

Stable neural function requires an energy supply that can meet the intense episodic power demands of neuronal activity. The bioenergetic machinery of glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation is highly responsive to such demands, but it must occupy a minimum volume if it is to accommodate these demands. We examined the trade-off between presynaptic power demands and the volume available to the bioenergetic machinery. We quantified the energy demands of six Drosophila motor nerve terminals through direct measurements of neurotransmitter release and Ca2+ entry, and via theoretical estimates of Na+ entry and power demands at rest. Electron microscopy revealed that terminals with the highest power demands contained the greatest volume of mitochondria, indicating that mitochondria are allocated according to presynaptic power demands. In addition, terminals with the greatest power demand-to-volume ratio ([~]66 nmol{middle dot}min-1{middle dot}L-1) harbor the largest mitochondria packed at the greatest density. If we assume sequential and complete oxidation of glucose by glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation, then these mitochondria are required to produce ATP at a rate of 52 nmol{middle dot}min-1{middle dot}L-1 at rest, rising to 963 during activity. Glycolysis would contribute ATP at 0.24 nmol{middle dot}min-1{middle dot}L-1 of cytosol at rest, rising to 4.36. These data provide a quantitative framework for presynaptic bioenergetics in situ, and reveal that, beyond an immediate capacity to accelerate ATP output from glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation, over longer time periods presynaptic terminals optimize mitochondrial volume and density to meet power demand. Significance StatementThe remarkable energy demands of the brain are supported by the complete oxidation of its fuel but debate continues regarding a division of labor between glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation across different cell types. Here we leverage the neuromuscular synapse, a model for studying neurophysiology, to elucidate fundamental aspects of neuronal energy metabolism that ultimately constrain rates of neural processing. We quantified energy production rates required to sustain activity at individual nerve terminals and compared these data with the volume capable of oxidative phosphorylation (mitochondria) and glycolysis (cytosol). We find strong support for oxidative phosphorylation playing a primary role in presynaptic terminals and provide the first in vivo estimates of energy production rates per unit volume of presynaptic mitochondria and cytosol.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

A Connectome and Analysis of the Adult Drosophila Central Brain

The neural circuits responsible for animal behavior remain largely unknown. We summarize new methods and present the circuitry of a large fraction of the brain of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Improved methods include new procedures to prepare, image, align, segment, find synapses in, and proofread such large data sets. We define cell types, refine computational compartments, and provide an exhaustive atlas of cell examples and types, many of them novel. We provide detailed circuits consisting of neurons and their chemical synapses for most of the central brain. We make the data public and simplify access, reducing the effort needed to answer circuit questions, and provide procedures linking the neurons defined by our analysis with genetic reagents. Biologically, we examine distributions of connection strengths, neural motifs on different scales, electrical consequences of compartmentalization, and evidence that maximizing packing density is an important criterion in the evolution of the flys brain.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2020

A Connectome of the Adult Drosophila Central Brain

The neural circuits responsible for behavior remain largely unknown. Previous efforts have reconstructed the complete circuits of small animals, with hundreds of neurons, and selected circuits for larger animals. Here we (the FlyEM project at Janelia and collaborators at Google) summarize new methods and present the complete circuitry of a large fraction of the brain of a much more complex animal, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Improved methods include new procedures to prepare, image, align, segment, find synapses, and proofread such large data sets; new methods that define cell types based on connectivity in addition to morphology; and new methods to simplify access to a large and evolving data set. From the resulting data we derive a better definition of computational compartments and their connections; an exhaustive atlas of cell examples and types, many of them novel; detailed circuits for most of the central brain; and exploration of the statistics and structure of different brain compartments, and the brain as a whole. We make the data public, with a web site and resources specifically designed to make it easy to explore, for all levels of expertise from the expert to the merely curious. The public availability of these data, and the simplified means to access it, dramatically reduces the effort needed to answer typical circuit questions, such as the identity of upstream and downstream neural partners, the circuitry of brain regions, and to link the neurons defined by our analysis with genetic reagents that can be used to study their functions. Note: In the next few weeks, we will release a series of papers with more involved discussions. One paper will detail the hemibrain reconstruction with more extensive analysis and interpretation made possible by this dense connectome. Another paper will explore the central complex, a brain region involved in navigation, motor control, and sleep. A final paper will present insights from the mushroom body, a center of multimodal associative learning in the fly brain.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2018

Control of synaptic specificity by limiting promiscuous synapse formation

The ability of neurons to distinguish appropriate from inappropriate synaptic partners in their local environment is fundamental to the proper assembly and function of neural circuits. How synaptic partner selection is regulated is a longstanding question in Neurobiology. A prevailing hypothesis is that appropriate partners express complementary molecules that match them together and promote synaptogenesis. Dpr and DIP IgSF proteins bind heterophilically and are expressed in a complementary manner between synaptic partners in the Drosophila visual system. Here, we show that in the lamina, DIP mis-expression is sufficient to promote synapse formation with Dpr-expressing neurons, and that DIP proteins are not necessary for synaptogenesis but rather function to prevent ectopic synapse formation. These findings indicate that Dpr-DIP interactions regulate synaptic specificity by biasing synapse formation towards specific cell-types. We propose that synaptogenesis occurs independent of synaptic partner choice, and that precise synaptic connectivity is established by limiting promiscuous synapse formation.

neuroscience↗