Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Borrega-Roman, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Borrega-Roman, L..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

A universal cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptor TR-FRET kinetic ligand binding assay.

INTRODUCTIONThe kinetics of ligand binding to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is an important determining factor in the preclinical evaluation of a molecule. Therefore, efforts should be made to measure this property as part of any drug development plan. The original assays used to assess ligand binding kinetics were developed using radioligands. However, these types of assays are very labor-intensive, limiting their application to the later phases of the drug discovery process. Recently, fluorescence-based ligand binding assays have been developed for multiple GPCRs, demonstrating their superiority through a homogeneous format and continuous data acquisition capabilities. The overriding aim of this study was to develop a fluorescence-based homogeneous ligand binding assay to profile the kinetics of compounds binding to human cannabinoid type 1 and 2 receptors (CB1R and CB2R). METHODSWe designed and synthesized D77, a novel universal tracer based on the lower affinity non-selective naturally occurring psychoactive cannabinoid, {Delta}8-THC. Using the TR-FRET (time-resolved Forster resonance energy transfer) technique to develop an assay to study the kinetics of ligand binding to CB1R and CB2R at physiological temperature. To establish a CB1R construct suitable for this assay, it was necessary to truncate the first 90 amino acids of the flexible CB1R N-terminal domain, in order to reduce the FRET distance between the terbium cryptate (donor) and the fluorescent ligand (acceptor), while the full length CB2R construct remained functional due to its shorter N-terminus. We then used the Motulsky-Mahan competition binding model to study the binding kinetics of non-fluorescent ligands. RESULTSD77 tracer displayed affinity for the truncated human CB1R (CB1R91-472) and full length CB2R (CB2R1-360) in the nanomolar range, and competitive binding behavior with orthosteric ligands. Crucially, D77 displayed fast dissociation kinetics from both CB1R and CB2R, comparable to those of the most rapidly dissociating reference compounds tested. This unique property of D77 proved pivotal to accurately determining the on- and off-rates of the fastest dissociating compounds. Using D77, we successfully determined the kinetic binding properties of a series of CB1R and CB2R agonists and antagonists at 37{degrees}C, including rimonabant, which was marketed for the treatment of obesity but later withdrawn due to serious neurological side effects. DISCUSSIONThe kon values of molecules binding CB1R showed a difference of three orders of magnitude from the slowest associating compound, HU308 to the most rapid, rimonabant. Interestingly, we found a strong correlation between kon and affinity for compounds binding to CB1R, suggesting that the association rate is the main parameter determining the affinity of compounds binding to CB1R. For compounds binding to CB2R, both kon and koff parameters contributed as affinity determinants. However, in contrast to CB1R, a stronger correlation was found between the dissociation constant rate parameter and the affinity of these molecules, suggesting that a combination of kon and koff dictates the overall affinity of compounds binding to CB2R. Ultimately, exploring the kinetic parameters of potential cannabinoid drug candidates could help future drug development programs targeting these receptors.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

Molecular determinants of antagonist interactions with chemokine receptors CCR2 and CCR5

By driving monocyte chemotaxis, the chemokine receptor CCR2 shapes inflammatory responses and the formation of tumor microenvironments. This makes it a promising target in inflammation and immuno-oncology; however, despite extensive efforts, there are no FDA-approved CCR2-targeting therapeutics. Cited challenges include the redundancy of the chemokine system, suboptimal properties of compound candidates, and species differences that confound the translation of results from animals to humans. Structure-based drug design can rationalize and accelerate the discovery and optimization of CCR2 antagonists to address these challenges. The prerequisites for such efforts include an atomic-level understanding of the molecular determinants of action of existing antagonists. In this study, using molecular docking and artificial-intelligence-powered compound library screening, we uncover the structural principles of small molecule antagonism and selectivity towards CCR2 and its sister receptor CCR5. CCR2 orthosteric inhibitors are shown to universally occupy an inactive-state-specific tunnel between receptor helices 1 and 7; we also discover an unexpected role for an extra-helical groove accessible through this tunnel, suggesting its potential as a new targetable interface for CCR2 and CCR5 modulation. By contrast, only shape complementarity and limited helix 8 hydrogen bonding govern the binding of various chemotypes of allosteric antagonists. CCR2 residues S1012.63 and V2446.36 are implicated as determinants of CCR2/CCR5 and human/mouse orthosteric and allosteric antagonist selectivity, respectively, and the role of S1012.63 is corroborated through experimental gain-of-function mutagenesis. We establish a critical role of induced fit in antagonist recognition, reveal strong chemotype selectivity of existing structures, and demonstrate the high predictive potential of a new deep-learning-based compound scoring function. Finally, this study expands the available CCR2 structural landscape with computationally generated chemotype-specific models well-suited for structure-based antagonist design.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

Ligand-Dependent Mechanisms of C-C Chemokine Receptor 5 (CCR5) Trafficking Revealed by APEX2 Proximity Labeling Proteomics

CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) promotes inflammatory responses by driving cell migration and scavenging chemokine to shape directional chemokine gradients. A CCR5 inhibitor has been approved for blocking HIV entry into cells. However, targeting CCR5 for the treatment of other diseases has had limited success, likely because of the complexity of CCR5 pharmacology and biology. CCR5 is activated by natural and engineered chemokines that elicit distinct signaling and trafficking responses, including receptor sequestration inside the cell. Intracellular sequestration may be therapeutically exploitable as a strategy for receptor inhibition, but the mechanisms by which different ligands promote receptor retention in the cell versus presence on the cell membrane are poorly understood. We employed live cell ascorbic acid peroxidase (APEX2) proximity labeling and quantitative mass spectrometry proteomics for unbiased discovery of temporally resolved protein neighborhoods of CCR5 following stimulation with its endogenous agonist, CCL5, and two CCL5 variants that promote intracellular retention of the receptor. Along with targeted pharmacological assays, the data reveal distinct ligand-dependent CCR5 trafficking patterns with temporal and spatial resolution. All three chemokines internalize CCR5 via {beta}-arrestin-dependent, clathrin-mediated endocytosis but to different extents, with different kinetics and varying dependencies on GPCR kinase subtypes. The agonists differ in their ability to target the receptor to lysosomes for degradation, as well as to the Golgi compartment and the trans-Golgi network, and these trafficking patterns translate into distinct levels of ligand scavenging. The results provide insight into the cellular mechanisms behind CCR5 intracellular sequestration and suggest how trafficking can be exploited for the development of functional antagonists of CCR5. Significance StatementCCR5 plays a crucial role in the immune system and is important in numerous physiological and pathological processes such as inflammation, cancer and transmission of HIV. It responds to different ligands with distinct signaling and trafficking behaviors; notably some ligands induce retention of the receptor inside the cell. Using time-resolved proximity labeling proteomics and targeted pharmacological experiments, this study reveals the cellular basis for receptor sequestration that can be exploited as a therapeutic strategy for inhibiting CCR5 function.

cell biology↗