Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Bonsall, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Bonsall, M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Differential effects of conspecific and heterospecific density on the development of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus larvae

O_LIBetween-species competition shapes the distribution and abundance of populations. Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus are vectors of pathogens such as dengue and are known to compete at the larval stage.\nC_LIO_LIThe outcome of this inter-species competition has been found to be context dependent, with the strength and direction changing with resource availability and type. We were motivated by this uncertainty, and aimed to elucidate the magnitude and mechanism of competition.\nC_LIO_LIWe manipulated the larval density of mixed and single species cohorts of larvae, measuring the effects on survivorship and development time. Unlike other related studies, we adjusted the feeding regime so that the per-capita resource availability was kept constant across all density treatments, at a level sufficient for successful development. This ensured that each larvae at least had the opportunity to gain the requisite resources for pupation.\nC_LIO_LIOur analysis found that Ae. aegypti suffered notably less mortality due to intra- and interspecific competition. For both species, intra- and interspecific competition led to the survival of faster developing individuals, with the exception that slower developing Ae. albopictus larvae survived when exposed a combination of both high con- and heterospecific densities.\nC_LIO_LIThese results show that the competition between Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus can still occur even when resources are theoretically adequate for development. This suggests that larvae can alter resource seeking and consumption parameters when exposed to high densities of conspecifics and heterospecifics, leading to contest competition. Evidence for resource-independent mechanisms of competition such as crowding are also found, as is evidence for the importance of demographic stochasticity in population processes.\nC_LI

ecology

Interaction modifications lead to greater robustness than pairwise non-trophic effects in ecological networks

O_LIConsiderable emphasis has been placed recently on the importance of incorporating non-trophic effects in to our understanding of ecological networks. Interaction modifications are well established as generating strong non-trophic impacts by modulating the strength of inter-specific interactions.\nC_LIO_LIFor simplicity and comparison with direct interactions within a network context, the consequences of interaction modifications have often been described as direct pairwise interactions. The consequences of this assumption have not been examined in non-equilibrium settings where unexpected consequences of interaction modifications are most likely.\nC_LIO_LITo test the distinct dynamic nature of these higher-order effects we directly compare, using dynamic simulations, the robustness to extinctions under perturbation of systems where interaction modifications are either explicitly modelled or represented by corresponding equivalent pairwise non-trophic interactions.\nC_LIO_LIFull, multi-species representations of interaction modifications resulted in a greater robustness to extinctions compared to equivalent pairwise effects. Explanations for this increased stability despite apparent greater dynamic complexity can be found in additional routes for dynamic feedbacks. Furthermore, interaction modifications changed the relative vulnerability of species to extinction from those trophically connected close to the perturbed species towards those receiving a large number of modifications.\nC_LIO_LIFuture empirical and theoretical research into non-trophic effects should distinguish interaction modifications from direct pairwise effects in order to maximise information about the system dynamics. Interaction modifications have the potential to shift expectations of species vulnerability based exclusively on trophic networks.\nC_LI

ecology

Mammal extinctions and the increasing isolation of humans on the tree of life

A sixth great mass extinction is ongoing due to the direct and indirect effects of human pressures. However, not all lineages are impacted equally. As humans, we frequently believe that we hold a unique place on Earth. Here, we show that our current impacts on the natural world risk to heighten that expectation. Evolutionary proximity to Homo sapiens emerges as a powerful predictor of extinction risk among mammals. Our analysis shows that the species most closely related to H. sapiens are exposed to a large variety of threat types and that they may also have greater intrinsic sensitivity to threats. Pruning back the tree of life around us will lead to our species being among those with the fewest close relatives. We will erase our evolutionary history, forcing its uniqueness. If no action is taken, we will lose crucial biodiversity for the preservation of Earth ecosystems, and a key reference to what makes us human.

ecology