Biology subjects

Bonhomme, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Bonhomme, D..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

A human homolog of SIR2 antiphage proteins mediates immunity via the TLR pathway

The full extent of immune system conservation between prokaryotes and eukaryotes is unknown. However, recent research supports that a subset of bacterial antiphage proteins is conserved in eukaryotes and likely gave rise to key actors of mammalian immunity. Here, we show that the SIR2 protein domain, present in bacterial antiphage systems, plays a role in eukaryotic innate immunity. Through phylogenetic analysis, we identify SIRanc, a human protein with a SIRim domain (subtype of SIR2). We demonstrate that SIRanc plays a pivotal role in the animal toll-like receptor (TLR) pathway of innate immunity by mediating the transcriptional upregulation of proinflammatory genes downstream of TLR stimulation. This depends on the enzymatic activity of SIRanc, which degrades NAD+, a central cellular metabolite. Finally, we show that proteins with a SIRim domain are diverse and widespread, detected in 19% of eukaryotic genomes, with SIRanc representing one of the five sirim lineages. This work opens avenues of research on the potential role of eukaryotic SIRim proteins in immunity, as well as on the involvement of SIRanc in human pathology.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2022

Leptospiral lipopolysaccharide dampens inflammation through upregulation of autophagy adaptor p62 and NRF2 signaling in macrophages

Leptospira interrogans are pathogenic bacteria responsible for leptospirosis, a worldwide zoonosis. All vertebrates can be infected, and some species like humans are susceptible to the disease whereas rodents such as mice are resistant and become asymptomatic renal carriers. Leptospires are stealth bacteria that are known to escape several immune recognition pathways and resist killing mechanisms. We recently published that leptospires may survive intracellularly and exit macrophages, in part by escaping xenophagy, a pathogen-targeting form of autophagy. Interestingly, autophagy is one of the antimicrobial mechanisms often highjacked by bacteria to evade the host immune response. In this study we therefore explored whether leptospires subvert the key molecular players of autophagy to facilitate the infection. We showed in macrophages that leptospires triggered a specific accumulation of autophagy-adaptor p62 in puncta-like structures, without major alteration of autophagy flux. Unlike active bacterial mechanisms described to date, we demonstrated that leptospires trigger p62 accumulation using a passive mechanism of LPS signaling via TLR4/TLR2. p62 is a central pleiotropic protein, not only involved in autophagy, but also mediating cell stress and death, via the translocation of transcription factors. We demonstrated that Leptospira-driven accumulation of p62 induced the translocation of transcription factor NRF2. However, NRF2 translocation upon Leptospira infection did not result as expected in antioxydant response, but dampened the production of inflammatory mediators such as iNOS/NO, TNF and IL6. Overall, these findings highlight a novel passive bacterial mechanism linked to p62/NRF2 signaling that decreases inflammation and contributes to the stealthiness of leptospires.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2022

L.interrogans prevents macrophage death and pyroptotic IL1β release through its lipopolysaccharide

Leptospira interrogans are bacteria that can infect all vertebrates and are responsible for leptospirosis, a neglected zoonosis. Some hosts are susceptible to leptospirosis whereas mice are resistant and get chronically colonized. Although leptospires escape recognition by some immune receptors, they activate NLRP3-inflammasome and trigger IL1{beta} secretion. Classically, IL1{beta} secretion is associated with lytic inflammatory cell death called pyroptosis, resulting from cytosolic LPS binding to inflammatory caspases. Interestingly, we showed that L. interrogans do not trigger cell death in either murine, human, hamster, or bovine macrophages, escaping both pyroptosis and apoptosis. Strikingly, we also revealed in murine cells, a potent antagonistic effect of leptospires and their atypical LPS on spontaneous and E. coli LPS-induced cell death. The leptospiral LPS efficiently prevents caspase 11 dimerization and subsequent gasdermin D cleavage. Finally, we showed that pyroptosis escape by leptospires prevents massive IL1 {beta} release, and we consistently found no major role of IL1-Receptor in controlling experimental leptospirosis in vivo. Overall, our findings described a novel mechanism by which leptospires dampen inflammation, thus potentially contributing to their stealthiness. Graphical abstract O_FIG_DISPLAY_L [Figure 1] M_FIG_DISPLAY C_FIG_DISPLAY

immunology↗

bioRxiv2020

Escape of TLR5 Recognition by Leptospira spp: A Rationale for Atypical Endoflagella

Leptospira interrogans are invasive bacteria responsible for leptospirosis, a worldwide zoonosis. They possess two periplasmic endoflagella that allow their motility. L. interrogans are stealth pathogens that escape the innate immune responses of the NOD-like receptors NOD1/2, and the human Toll-like receptor (TLR)4, sensing peptidoglycan and lipopolysaccharide (LPS), respectively. TLR5 is another receptor of bacterial cell wall components, recognizing flagellin subunits. To study the contribution of TLR5 in the host defense against leptospires, we infected WT and TLR5 deficient mice with pathogenic L. interrogans and tracked the infection by in vivo live imaging of bioluminescent bacteria or by q-PCR. We did not identify any protective or inflammatory role of murine TLR5 to control pathogenic Leptospira. Likewise, subsequent in vitro experiments showed that infections with different live strains of L. interrogans and L. biflexa did not trigger TLR5. However, unexpectedly, heat-killed bacteria stimulated human and bovine TLR5, although barely mouse TLR5. Abolition of TLR5 recognition required extensive boiling time of the bacteria or proteinase K treatment, showing an unusual high stability of the leptospiral flagellins. Interestingly, using antimicrobial peptides to destabilize live leptospires, we detected some TLR5 activity, suggesting that TLR5 could participate in the fight against leptospires in humans or cattle. Using different Leptospira strains with mutations in flagellin proteins, we further showed that neither FlaAs nor Fcps participated in the recognition by TLR5, suggesting a role for the FlaBs. These have structural homology to Salmonella FliC, and conserved residues important for TLR5 activation, as shown by in silico analyses. Accordingly, we found that leptospires regulate the expression of FlaB mRNA according to the growth phase in vitro, and that infection with L. interrogans in hamsters and in mice downregulated the expression of the FlaBs but not the FlaAs subunits. Altogether, in contrast to different bacteria that modify their flagellin sequences to escape TLR5 recognition, our study suggests that the peculiar central localization and stability of the FlaB monomers in the periplasmic endoflagella, associated with the downregulation of FlaB subunits in hosts, constitute an efficient strategy of leptospires to escape TLR5 recognition and the immune response.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2020

Leptospiral LPS escapes mouse TLR4 internalization and TRIF?associated antimicrobial responses through O antigen and associated lipoproteins

Leptospirosis is a worldwide re-emerging zoonosis caused by pathogenic Leptospira spp. All vertebrate species can be infected; humans are sensitive hosts whereas other species, such as rodents, may become long-term renal carrier reservoirs. Upon infection, innate immune responses are initiated by recognition of Microbial Associated Molecular Patterns (MAMPs) by Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRRs). Among MAMPs, the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is recognized by the Toll-Like-Receptor 4 (TLR4) and activates both the MyD88-dependent pathway at the plasma membrane and the TRIF-dependent pathway after TLR4 internalization. We previously showed that leptospiral LPS is not recognized by the human TLR4, whereas it signals through murine TLR4, which mediates mouse resistance to acute leptospirosis. However, leptospiral LPS has low endotoxicity in mouse cells and is an agonist of TLR2, the sensor for bacterial lipoproteins. Here, using confocal microscopy and flow cytometry, we showed that the LPS of L. interrogans did not induce internalization of TLR4 in mouse macrophages, unlike the LPS of Escherichia coli. Consequently, the LPS failed to induce the production of the TRIF-dependent nitric oxide and RANTES, both important antimicrobial responses. Using shorter O antigen LPS and repurified leptospiral LPS with reporter HEK cells, we further found this TLR4-TRIF escape to be dependent on both the co-purifying lipoproteins and the full-length O antigen. Furthermore, our data suggest that the O antigen could alter the binding of the leptospiral LPS to the co-receptor CD14 that is essential for TLR4-TRIF activation. Overall, we describe here a novel immune escape mechanism linked to leptospiral LPS. We hypothesize that the LPS, already known as a virulence factor, plays a major role in the innate immune evasion of the leptospires, thereby contributing to their stealthiness and chronicity in mice. Author summaryLeptospira interrogans is a bacterial pathogen, responsible for leptospirosis, a worldwide neglected reemerging disease. L. interrogans may cause an acute severe disease in humans, whereas rodents and other animals asymptomatically carry the leptospires in their kidneys. They can therefore excrete live bacteria in urine and contaminate the environment. Leptospires are stealth pathogens known to escape the innate immune defenses of their hosts. They are covered in lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a bacterial motif recognized in mammals through the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), which triggers two different signaling pathways. We showed previously that pathogenic leptospires escape TLR4 recognition in humans. Here we show in mice that the leptospiral LPS triggers only one arm of the TLR4 pathway and escapes the other, hence avoiding production of antimicrobial compounds. Removing the lipoproteins that always co-purify with the leptospiral LPS, or using shorter LPS, restores the stimulation of both pathways. This suggests a novel escape mechanism linked to the LPS and involving lipoproteins that could be instrumental for leptospires to escape the mouse defense and allows for their chronic renal colonization.

immunology↗