Biology subjects

Bongioanni, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Bongioanni, A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

General mechanisms of task engagement in the primate frontal cortex

Staying engaged with a task is necessary to maintain goal-directed behaviors. Although engagement varies with the specific task at hand it also exhibits continuous, intrinsic fluctuations widely. This intrinsic component of engagement is difficult to isolate behaviorally or neurally in controlled experiments with humans. By contrast, animals spontaneously move between periods of complete task engagement and disengagement, even in experimental settings. We, therefore, looked at behavior in macaques in a series of four tasks while recording fMRI signals. We identified consistent autocorrelation in task disengagement. This made it possible to build models capturing task-independent engagement and to link it to neural activity. Across all tasks, we identified common patterns of neural activity linked to impending task disengagement in mid-cingulate gyrus. By contrast, activity centered in perigenual anterior cingulate cortex (pgACC) was associated with maintenance of task performance. Importantly, we were able to carefully control for task-specific factors such as the reward history, choice value, and other motivational effects, such as response vigor, as indexed by response time, when identifying neural activity associated with task engagement. Moreover, we showed pgACC activity had a causal link to task engagement; in one of our tasks, transcranial ultrasound stimulation of pgACC, but not of control regions, changed task engagement/disengagement patterns.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Distractor effects in decision making depends on individual's style of integrating choice attributes

It is widely agreed that people make irrational decisions in the presence of irrelevant distractor options. However, there is little consensus on whether decision making is facilitated or impaired by the presence of a highly rewarding distractor or whether the distraction effect operates at the level of options component attributes rather than at the level of their overall value. To reconcile different claims, we argue that it is important to incorporate consideration of the diversity of peoples ways of decision making. We focus on a recent debate over whether people combine choice attributes in an additive or multiplicative way. Employing a multi-laboratory dataset investigating the same decision making paradigm, we demonstrated that people used a mix of both approaches and the extent to which approach was used varied across individuals. Critically, we identified that this variability was correlated with the effect of the distractor on decision making. Individuals who tended to use a multiplicative approach to compute value, showed a positive distractor effect. In contrast, in individuals who tended to use an additive approach, a negative distractor effect (divisive normalisation) was prominent. These findings suggest that the distractor effect is related to how value is constructed, which in turn may be influenced by task and subject specificities. Our work concurs with recent behavioural and neuroscience findings that multiple distractor effects co-exist.

neuroscience↗