Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bodin, F.

Publications and source records attributed to Bodin, F..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Eco-evolutionary games in noisy environments

Cooperative and competitive interactions among individuals harvesting resources can shape environmental states, such as prey abundance. In turn, environmental conditions feed back to influence strategic interactions. Eco-evolutionary game theory studies how these feedbacks shape the co-evolution of behavior and environment. Existing models typically assume deterministic, noise-free environmental dynamics. However, real environments are inherently stochastic, for example due to finite resources, and noise can qualitatively alter social outcomes. Here, we incorporate stochastic environmental dynamics into eco-evolutionary game theory. When environmental change is slow relative to strategy updates, we show that behavior reflects a mixture of the games associated with low and high environmental states, often yielding outcomes qualitatively distinct from deterministic predictions. In particular, environmental stochasticity can eliminate bistability and enforce dominance of a single behavior. When environmental dynamics are faster, populations have less opportunity to track fluctuations, and behavior converges toward strategies that are optimal on average. Stochasticity can even causes persistent oscillations in the tragedy of commons, in regimes where classical models predict stability. Our framework provides a tractable approach for analyzing social behavior linked to environmental dynamics how noise shapes long-term eco-evolutionary outcomes.

evolutionary biology↗

Questioning the Evidence for Host-Symbiont Codiversification in Mycorrhizal Symbioses

The vast majority of plants form mycorrhizal symbioses. The ecological importance of these mutualistic interactions has sparked interest in their long evolutionary history. By examining interaction networks and phylogenetic trees, several studies have suggested that plants codiversify with their associated mycorrhizal fungi. However, recent research has demonstrated that phylogenetic congruence (interpreted as codiversification when divergence times match) is often conflated with another pattern called cophylogenetic signal (i.e., closely related plants interacting with closely related fungi and vice versa), which may arise from different biological processes. We performed cophylogenetic analyses on 29 diverse mycorrhizal networks to reevaluate the evidence for codiversification in mycorrhizal symbioses. We found significant cophylogenetic signal but no phylogenetic congruence: closely related plants often interact with closely related fungi, but their phylogenies do not match. Instead of codiversification, this finding is consistent with trait matching between plants and mycorrhizal fungi, where compatible, evolutionarily conserved plant and fungal traits govern their interactions. Our work highlights the importance of appropriately interpreting the cophylogenetic methods used to study the macroevolution of plants and their mycorrhizal fungi. It suggests that previous evidence of codiversification in mycorrhizal symbioses actually detected cophylogenetic signal, since across the multiple and diverse networks analyzed here, there is no evidence that codiversification occurred during the evolution of mycorrhizal symbioses.

evolutionary biology↗