Biology subjects

Blanchet, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Blanchet, S..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Intraspecific variation and warming have comparable effects on eco-evolutionary dynamics.

Phenotypic or genotypic variation within species affects ecological processes, from populations to ecosystems. However, whether the ecological imprint of intraspecific variation is substantial compared to key environmental drivers, and persistent enough to carry over to next generations is still questioned. Here, we experimentally showed that intraspecific variation manipulated in a freshwater fish (the European minnow, Phoxinus phoxinus) led to ecological and transgenerational carry-over effects that were as strong as those of varying temperature by 2{degrees}C. Specifically, variation in fish body mass, growth rate and activity altered the size and abundance of prey, which ultimately affected traits and survival of the next fish generation. Temperature variation modulated other ecosystem functions (e.g. litter decomposition) that were also associated to transgenerational carry-over effects. Our results demonstrate that shifting genotypes or phenotypes in wild populations can have substantial and persistent consequences on ecosystems with a similar intensity than climatic variation.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2018

The community and ecosystem consequences of intraspecific diversity: a meta-analysis

Understanding the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning has major implications. Biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships are generally investigated at the interspecific level, although intraspecific diversity (i.e. within-species diversity) is increasingly perceived as an important ecological facet of biodiversity. Here, we provide a quantitative and integrative synthesis testing, across diverse plant and animal species, whether intraspecific diversity is a major driver of community dynamics and ecosystem functioning. We specifically tested (i) whether the number of genotypes/phenotypes (i.e. intraspecific richness) or the specific identity of genotypes/phenotypes (i.e. intraspecific variation) in populations modulate the structure of communities and the functioning of ecosystems, (ii) whether the ecological effects of intraspecific richness and variation are strong in magnitude, and (iii) whether these effects vary among taxonomic groups and ecological responses. We found a non-linear relationship between intraspecific richness and community and ecosystem dynamics that follows a saturating curve shape, as observed for biodiversity-function relationships measured at the interspecific level. Importantly, intraspecific richness modulated ecological dynamics with a magnitude that was equal to that previously reported for interspecific richness. Our results further confirm, based on a database containing more than 50 species, that intraspecific variation also has substantial effects on ecological dynamics. We demonstrated that the effects of intraspecific variation are twice as high as expected by chance, and that they might have been underestimated previously. Finally, we found that the ecological effects of intraspecific variation are not homogeneous and are actually stronger when intraspecific variation is manipulated in primary producers than in consumer species, and when they are measured at the ecosystem rather than at the community level. Overall, we demonstrated that the two facets of intraspecific diversity (richness and variation) can both strongly affect community and ecosystem dynamics, which reveals the pivotal role of within-species biodiversity for understanding ecological dynamics.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2018

Intraspecific genetic and phenotypic diversity: parallel processes and correlated patterns?

Intraspecific diversity plays a key role for evolutionary and ecological dynamics. It is the raw material on which acts selection, it improves species and communities resilience to disturbance and it affects the way species modulate their biotic and abiotic environment. Understanding patterns and underlying determinants of genetic and phenotypic intraspecific diversity is therefore of critical importance for ecological, evolutionary and conservation sciences. Here, focusing on two freshwater fish species (Gobio occitaniae and Phoxinus phoxinus) sampled across a large river basin (the Garonne-Dordogne river basin, France), we used causal analyses to test for genetic-phenotypic intraspecific diversity correlations (GPIDCs) and unravel the processes underlying intraspecific diversity patterns. Genetic diversity was assessed using microsatellite markers and phenotypic diversity was assessed through geometric morphometrics. We found disparities in the distribution of genetic and phenotypic diversity in the two species, suggesting higher level of local adaptation in G. occitaniae, and our results revealed common and contrasted processes shaping diversity at the - and {beta}-level. At the -level, we found no GPIDC in both species despite common relations between isolation and genetic and phenotypic -diversity in G. occitaniae. At the {beta}-level, we found no GPIDC in P. phoxinus but we found a positive GPIDC in G. occitaniae. This correlation appeared to be caused by a direct impact of one facet of intraspecific diversity on the other, and we speculated that it could originate from positive assortative mating. Studying neutral genetic diversity and phenotypic diversity within an integrative framework appears as a valuable way of deciphering the complex and diverse impacts of neutral and adaptive processes on intraspecific diversity patterns.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Bottom-up and top-down control of dispersal across major organismal groups: a coordinated distributed experiment

Organisms rarely experience a homogeneous environment. Rather, ecological and evolutionary dynamics unfold in spatially structured and fragmented landscapes, with dispersal as the central process linking these dynamics across spatial scales. Because dispersal is a multi-causal and highly plastic life-history trait, finding general drivers that are of importance across species is challenging but highly relevant for ecological forecasting.\n\nWe here tested whether two fundamental ecological forces and main determinants of local population dynamics, top-down and bottom-up control, generally explain dispersal in spatially structured communities. In a coordinated distributed experiment spanning a wide range of actively dispersing organisms, from protozoa to vertebrates, we show that bottom-up control, that is resource limitation, consistently increased dispersal. While top-down control, that is predation risk, was an equally important dispersal driver as bottom-up control, its effect depended on prey and predator space use and whether dispersal occurred on land, in water or in the air: species that routinely use more space than their predators showed increased dispersal in response to predation, specifically in aquatic environments. After establishing these general causes of dispersal, we used a metacommunity model to show that bottom-up and top-down control of dispersal has important consequences for local population fluctuations as well as cascading effects on regional metacommunity dynamics. Context-dependent dispersal reduced local population fluctuations and desynchronized dynamics between communities, two effects that increase population and community stability.\n\nOur study provides unprecedented insights into the generality of the positive resource dependency of dispersal as well as a robust experimental test of current theory predicting that predator-induced dispersal is modulated by prey and predator space use. Our experimental and theoretical work highlights the critical importance of the multi-causal nature of dispersal as well as its cascading effects on regional community dynamics, which are specifically relevant to ecological forecasting.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2017

The systematic conservation planning for intraspecific genetic diversity.

Intraspecific diversity informs the demographic and evolutionary histories of populations, and should be a main conservation target. Although approaches exist for identifying relevant biological conservation units, attempts to identify priority conservation areas for intraspecific diversity are scarce, especially within a multi-specific framework. We used neutral molecular data on six European freshwater fish species (Squalius cephalus, Phoxinus phoxinus, Barbatula barbatula, Gobio occitaniae, Leuciscus burdigalensis and Parachondrostoma toxostoma) sampled at the riverscape scale (i.e. the Garonne-Dordogne River basin, France) to determine hot- and cold-spots of genetic diversity, and to identify priority conservation areas using a systematic conservation planning approach. We demonstrate that systematic conservation planning is efficient for identifying priority areas representing a predefined part of the total genetic diversity of a whole landscape. With the exception of private allelic richness, classical genetic diversity indices (allelic richness, genetic uniqueness) were poor predictors for identifying priority areas. Moreover, we identified weak surrogacies among conservation solutions found for each species, implying that conservation solutions are highly species-specific. Nonetheless, we showed that priority areas identified using intraspecific genetic data from multiple species provide more effective conservation solutions than areas identified for single species or on the basis of traditional taxonomic criteria.

evolutionary biology↗