Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Biscay, R. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Biscay, R. J..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Linear causal filtering: definition and theory

1.This work provides a framework based on multivariate autoregressive modeling for linear causal filtering in the sense of Granger. In its bivariate form, the linear causal filter defined here takes as input signals A and B, and it filters out the causal effect of B on A, thus yielding two new signals only containing the Granger-causal effect of A on B. In its general multivariate form for more than two signals, the effect of all indirect causal connections between A and B, mediated by all other signals, are accounted for, partialled out, and filtered out also. The importance of this filter is that it enables the estimation of directional measures of causal information flow from any non-causal, non-directional measure of association. For instance, based on the classic coherence, a directional measure of strength of information flow from A to B is obtained when applied to the linear causal filtered pair containing only A to B connectivity information. This particular case is equivalent to the isolated effective coherence (doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00448). Of more recent interest are the large family of phase-phase, phase-amplitude, and amplitude-amplitude cross-frequency coupling measures which are non-directional. The linear causal filter makes it now possible to estimate the directional causal versions these measures of association. One important field of application is in brain connectivity analysis based on cortical signals of electric neuronal activity (e.g. estimated sources of EEG and MEG, and invasive intracranial ECoG recordings). The linear causal filter introduced here provides a novel solution to the problem of estimating the direction of information flow from any non-directional measure of association. This work provides definitions, non-ambiguous equations, and clear prescriptions for implementing the linear causal filter in diverse settings.

neuroscience↗

Measuring Granger-causal effects in multivariate time series by system editing

1.What is the role of each node in a system of many interconnected nodes? This can be quantified by comparing the dynamics of the nodes in the intact system, with their modified dynamics in the edited system, where one node is deleted. In detail, the spectra are calculated from a causal multivariate autoregressive model for the intact system. Next, without re-estimation, one node is deleted from the model and the modified spectra at all other nodes are re-calculated. The change in spectra from the edited system to the intact system quantifies the role of the deleted node, giving a measure of its Granger-causal effects (CFX) on the system. A generalization of this novel measure is available for networks (i.e. for groups of nodes), which quantifies the role of each network in a system of many networks. For the sake of reproducible research, program codes (PASCAL), executable file, and toy data in human readable format are included in the supplementary material.

neuroscience↗

Measures of time series coupling based on generalized weighted multiple regression

1.The sharing and the transmission of information between cortical brain regions is carried out by mechanisms that are still not fully understood. A deeper understanding should shed light on how consciousness and cognition are implemented in the brain. Research activity in this field has recently been focusing on the discovery of non-conventional coupling mechanisms, such as all forms of cross-frequency couplings between diverse combinations of amplitudes and phases, applied to measured or estimated cortical signals of electric neuronal activity. However, all coupling measures that involve phase computation have poor statistical properties. In this work, the conventional estimators for the well-known phase-phase (phase synchronization or locking), phase-amplitude, and phaseamplitude-amplitude couplings are generalized by means of the weighted multiple regression model. The choice of appropriate weights produces estimators that bypass the need for computing the complex-valued phase. In addition, a new coupling, denoted as the inhibitory coupling (InhCo), is introduced and defined as the dependence of one complex-valued variable on the inverse and on the conjugate inverse of another complex-valued variable. A weighted version denoted as wInhCo is also introduced, bypassing the need for computing the inverse of a complex variable, which has very poor statistical properties. The importance of this form of inhibitory coupling is that it may capture well- known processes, such as the observed inverse alpha/gamma relation within the same cortical region, or the inverse alpha/alpha relation between distant cortical regions.

neuroscience↗

Innovations orthogonalization: a solution to the major pitfalls of EEG/MEG "leakage correction"

1.The problem of interest here is the study of brain functional and effective connectivity based non-invasive EEG-MEG inverse solution time series. These signals generally have low spatial resolution, such that an estimated signal at any one site is an instantaneous linear mixture of the true, actual, unobserved signals across all cortical sites. False connectivity can result from analysis of these low-resolution signals. Recent efforts toward \"unmixing\" have been developed, under the name of \"leakage correction\". One recent noteworthy approach is that by Colclough et al (2015 NeuroImage, 117:439-448), which forces the inverse solution signals to have zero cross-correlation at lag zero. One goal is to show that Colcloughs method produces false human connectomes under very broad conditions. The second major goal is to develop a new solution, that appropriately \"unmixes\" the inverse solution signals, based on innovations orthogonalization. The new method first fits a multivariate autoregression to the inverse solution signals, giving the mixed innovations. Second, the mixed innovations are orthogonalized. Third, the mixed and orthogonalized innovations allow the estimation of the \"unmixing\" matrix, which is then finally used to \"unmix\" the inverse solution signals. It is shown that under very broad conditions, the new method produces proper human connectomes, even when the signals are not generated by an autoregressive model.

neuroscience↗