The changing contributions of weakness and the flexor synergy to post-stroke arm function over time: A kinematic re-examination of Twitchell
In 1951, the neurologist Thomas Twitchell published a seminal paper in Brain describing the time-course of recovery from hemiplegia after stroke in 25 participants from hospitalization to when they reached what he deemed steady state. His main emphasis was on the evolution of voluntary movements at the shoulder, elbow and hand, first within an obligatory flexor synergy, and then independently out-of-synergy. We thought that 75 years later, an update using modern motion capture technology should be attempted as it would allow for finer granularity in the characterization of the time courses of both functional recovery and of the flexor synergy, and then relate them to each other, to weakness and to well-established clinical scales. To this end, we used marker-less 3D kinematics to assess task performance and intrusion of synergies in thirty-three stroke participants longitudinally, from the early sub-acute stage (1 - 8 weeks post-stroke) to the chronic stage (24 - 64 weeks post-stroke). Participants performed an out-of-flexor synergy (shoulder flexion and elbow extension) reaching task. We assessed the time course of recovery of obligatory intrusion of pathological synergies based on measures derived from the angular velocity profiles of the shoulder and the elbow joints. Task-related kinematic measures were obtained and compared to sixteen healthy controls. Grip strength, Motor impairment (FMA), and function (ARAT) scores were also collected. Task kinematics were different from controls in the early, late sub-acute, and chronic stages, but showed gradual recovery over time. Weakness in the hand remained impaired at all time points. Flexor-synergy intrusion was maximal in the early sub-acute stage and then began to subside. Regression analysis with functional kinematic and clinical (FMA, ARAT) measures indicated that flexor-synergy intrusion was a significant predictor in the early and late sub-acute stages, but not in the chronic stage, while weakness remained a significant predictor at all stages of recovery. To better address the relationship between synergies, weakness, and function, we analyzed the more severe cases (ARAT<21) separately. In the sub-acute stage, most of them (11/13) suffered from intrusion of synergies, whereas in the chronic phase, only a minority (2/8) did. Weakness seemed to be the main contributor to poor outcome in the chronic phase. We conclude that weakness and synergy intrusion evolve separately from the subacute to the chronic phase, perhaps more so when neurorehabilitation is given at a dose higher than standard of care.