Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bime, C.

Publications and source records attributed to Bime, C..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Preclinical evaluation of the efficacy of α-Difluoromethylornithine and Sulindac against SARS-CoV-2 infection

Despite numerous research efforts and several effective vaccines and therapies developed against COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), drug repurposing remains an attractive alternative to identify new treatments for SARS-CoV-2 virus variants and other viral infections that may emerge in the future. Cellular polyamines support viral propagation and tumor growth. Here we tested the antiviral activity of an irreversible inhibitor of polyamine biosynthesis, -difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) and a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) Sulindac, which have been previously evaluated for colon cancer chemoprevention. The drugs were tested as single agents and in combination in human Calu-3 lung adenocarcinoma and Caco-2 colon adenocarcinoma cell lines and the K18-hACE2 transgenic mouse model of severe COVID-19. DFMO/Sulindac combination significantly suppressed SARS-CoV-2 N1 Nucleocapsid mRNA and ACE2 mRNA levels in the infected human cell lines by interacting synergistically when cells were pretreated with drugs and additively when treatment was applied to the infected cells. The antiviral activity of DFMO and Sulindac was tested in vivo as prophylaxis (drug supplementation at the doses equivalent to the human chemoprevention trial started 7 days before infection) or as treatment (drug supplementation started 24 hours post-infection). Prophylaxis with DFMO and Sulindac as single agents significantly increased survival rates in the young male mice (p=0.01, and p=0.027, respectively), and the combination was effective in the aged male mice (p=0.042). Young female mice benefited the most from the prophylaxis with Sulindac alone (p=0.001) and DFMO/Sulindac combination (p=0.018), while aged female mice did not benefit significantly from any interventions. The treatment regime was ineffective in suppressing SARS-CoV-2 infection in K18-hACE2 mice. Overall, animal studies demonstrated the protective age- and sex-dependent antiviral efficacy of DFMO and Sulindac against SARS-CoV-2.

cell biology↗

Identification of a multi-omics factor predictive of long COVID in the IMPACC study

Following SARS-CoV-2 infection, [~]10-35% of COVID-19 patients experience long COVID (LC), in which often debilitating symptoms persist for at least three months. Elucidating the biologic underpinnings of LC could identify therapeutic opportunities. We utilized machine learning methods on biologic analytes and patient reported outcome surveys provided over 12 months after hospital discharge from >500 hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the IMPACC cohort to identify a multi-omics "recovery factor". IMPACC participants who experienced LC had lower recovery factor scores compared to participants without LC. Biologic characterization revealed increased levels of plasma proteins associated with inflammation, elevated transcriptional signatures of heme metabolism, and decreased androgenic steroids in LC patients. The recovery factor was also associated with altered circulating immune cell frequencies. Notably, recovery factor scores were predictive of LC occurrence in patients as early as hospital admission, irrespective of acute disease severity. Thus, the recovery factor identifies patients at risk of LC early after SARS-CoV-2 infection and reveals LC biomarkers and potential treatment targets.

systems biology↗

Unraveling SARS-CoV-2 Host-Response Heterogeneity through Longitudinal Molecular Subtyping

Hospitalized COVID-19 patients exhibit diverse immune responses during acute infection, which are associated with a wide range of clinical outcomes. However, understanding these immune heterogeneities and their links to various clinical complications, especially long COVID, remains a challenge. In this study, we performed unsupervised subtyping of longitudinal multi-omics immunophenotyping in over 1,000 hospitalized patients, identifying two critical subtypes linked to mortality or mechanical ventilation with prolonged hospital stay and three severe subtypes associated with timely acute recovery. We confirmed that unresolved systemic inflammation and T-cell dysfunctions were hallmarks of increased severity and further distinguished patients with similar acute respiratory severity by their distinct immune profiles, which correlated with differences in demographic and clinical complications. Notably, one critical subtype (SubF) was uniquely characterized by early excessive inflammation, insufficient anticoagulation, and fatty acid dysregulation, alongside higher incidences of hematologic, cardiac, and renal complications, and an elevated risk of long COVID. Among the severe subtypes, significant differences in viral clearance and early antiviral responses were observed, with one subtype (SubC) showing strong early T-cell cytotoxicity but a poor humoral response, slower viral clearance, and greater risks of chronic organ dysfunction and long COVID. These findings provide crucial insights into the complex and context-dependent nature of COVID-19 immune responses, highlighting the importance of personalized therapeutic strategies to improve both acute and long-term outcomes.

immunology↗

Chronic Viral Reactivation and Associated Host Immune Response and Clinical Outcomes in Acute COVID-19 and Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19

Chronic viral infections are ubiquitous in humans, with individuals harboring multiple latent viruses that can reactivate during acute illnesses. Recent studies have suggested that SARS- CoV-2 infection can lead to reactivation of latent viruses such as Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV), yet, the extent and impact of viral reactivation in COVID-19 and its effect on the host immune system remain incompletely understood. Here we present a comprehensive multi-omic analysis of viral reactivation of all known chronically infecting viruses in 1,154 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, from the Immunophenotyping Assessment in a COVID-19 Cohort (IMPACC) study, who were followed prospectively for twelve months. We reveal significant reactivation of Herpesviridae, Enteroviridae, and Anelloviridae families during acute stage of COVID-19 (0-40 days post- hospitalization), each exhibiting distinct temporal dynamics. We also show that viral reactivation correlated with COVID-19 severity, demographic characteristics, and clinical outcomes, including mortality. Integration of cytokine profiling, cellular immunophenotyping, metabolomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics demonstrated virus-specific host responses, including elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g. IL-6, CXCL10, and TNF), increased activated CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, and upregulation of cellular replication genes, independent of COVID-19 severity and SARS-CoV-2 viral load. Notably, persistent Anelloviridae reactivation during convalescence ([≥]3 months post-hospitalization) was associated with Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) symptoms, particularly physical function and fatigue. Our findings highlight a remarkable prevalence and potential impact of chronic viral reactivation on host responses and clinical outcomes during acute COVID-19 and long term PASC sequelae. Our data provide novel immune, transcriptomic, and metabolomic biomarkers of viral reactivation that may inform novel approaches to prognosticate, prevent, or treat acute COVID- 19 and PASC.

immunology↗

T-cell cellular stress and reticulocyte signatures, but not loss of naive T lymphocytes, characterize severe COVID-19 in older adults

In children and younger adults up to 39 years of age, SARS-CoV-2 usually elicits mild symptoms that resemble the common cold. Disease severity increases with age starting at 30 and reaches astounding mortality rates that are ~330 fold higher in persons above 85 years of age compared to those 18-39 years old. To understand age-specific immune pathobiology of COVID-19 we have analyzed soluble mediators, cellular phenotypes, and transcriptome from over 80 COVID-19 patients of varying ages and disease severity, carefully controlling for age as a variable. We found that reticulocyte numbers and peripheral blood transcriptional signatures robustly correlated with disease severity. By contrast, decreased numbers and proportion of naive T-cells, reported previously as a COVID-19 severity risk factor, were found to be general features of aging and not of COVID-19 severity, as they readily occurred in older participants experiencing only mild or no disease at all. Single-cell transcriptional signatures across age and severity groups showed that severe but not moderate/mild COVID-19 causes cell stress response in different T-cell populations, and some of that stress was unique to old severe participants, suggesting that in severe disease of older adults, these defenders of the organism may be disabled from performing immune protection. These findings shed new light on interactions between age and disease severity in COVID-19.

immunology↗