Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Biggs, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Biggs, J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Environmental DNA captures the internal structure of a pond metacommunity

Technological progress is enabling ecologists to create repeated, large-scale, structured, and standardised community surveys. However, it is unclear how best to extract information from these novel community data. We metabarcoded 48 vertebrate species from their eDNA in 320 ponds in England and applied the internal-structure approach, which uses joint species distribution models to explain community compositions as the outcome of four metacommunity assembly processes: environmental filtering, dispersal, species interactions, and stochasticity. We find that the environment plays an important role in community assembly and that the inferred environmental preferences of species are consistent with their ecologies. We also infer negative biotic covariances between fish and amphibians, which is consistent with predator-prey interactions, and high spatial autocorrelation for the palmate newt, which is consistent with its hypothesised relictual distribution. Comparing sites in the metacommunity, environmentally and spatially distinctive sites are better explained by their environmental covariates and geographic locations, respectively, revealing sites where environmental filtering and dispersal limitation act more strongly. Furthermore, species belonging to different trait groups differ in how well environmental covariates, biotic covariances, and geographical locations explain their distributions. Overall, our results highlight the value of a modern interpretation of metacommunity ecology that embraces the fact that assembly processes differ between individual species and sites. We discuss how novel community data make feasible several study-design improvements that will strengthen the inference of metacommunity assembly processes from observational data.

ecology↗

Nature based measures reverse catchment biodiversity loss and increase freshwater resilience in an agricultural landscape

This is the first study that describes the effect of adding mitigation measures on the freshwater biodiversity of all waterbody types in agricultural catchments. We measured alpha (site) and gamma (catchment) richness annually over a nine-year period in all the streams, ponds and ditches in three upper-catchments in the English lowlands, and investigated whether freshwater plant biodiversity could be increased by adding: (i) multi-functional ecosystem services measures to intercept pollutants, store water and promote biodiversity, and, (ii) biodiversity-only protection measures. In the absence of measures, all catchments saw a decline in macrophyte richness during the survey (mean species loss of 1% pa, rare species loss of 2% pa). Ponds were a key habitat with a disproportionate influence on catchment trends. Five years after introducing measures, natural colonisation of ecosystem services waterbodies (dammed streams and ditches, runoff ponds, flood storage ponds) largely cancelled-out the background loss of plant species but, importantly, did not restore the loss of rare plants. Adding clean water ponds as a biodiversity-only enhancement measure brought substantial benefits: increasing total-catchment richness by 26%, and the number of rare plant species by 181%. Populations of spatially restricted species also increased. Adding stream debris-dams as a biodiversity measure did not affect plant richness or rarity. The findings suggest that ecosystem services measures could bring some biodiversity benefits to agricultural catchments. However, creating clean-water ponds specifically targeted for biodiversity could hold considerable potential as a tool to help stem, and even reverse, ongoing declines in freshwater plant biodiversity across farming landscapes.

ecology↗