Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bieri, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Bieri, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Proprioception Impacts Body Perception in Healthy Aging: Insights from a Psychophysical and Computational Approach

The experience of owning a body (body ownership, BO) and the perception of our body dimensions (metric body representation, mBR) depend on the integration of multisensory cues. As the human sensory system is subjected to a decline along the lifespan, encompassing all sensory modalities, we hypothesize that body perception may be different in older, as compared to young adults. Here, we investigate this hypothesis by comparing the multisensory processing underlying BO and mBR in healthy older (> 65 years) and young individuals. First, we applied rigorous computational and psychophysical methods to assess alterations in mBR and BO quantitatively. We then modeled the manifold relationship between the observed body misperceptions and the potential underlying sensory, motor, and cognitive factors. The results highlight significant differences between the two groups, with higher distortions in perceived arm dimensions and an increased tendency to experience BO towards a virtual hand in the aged group. These differences in both mBR and BO are explained by the reduced proprioceptive abilities of older adults, suggesting a crucial role of proprioception in driving age-dependent plasticity in body representations. Overall, our modeling and experimental approach provide new perspectives on altered body perception during aging, suggesting that they stem from the physiological proprioceptive decline occurring in older adults, and laying the groundwork to generate prevention and stimulation strategies to restore accurate body perception in aging.

neuroscience↗

How to best evaluate applications for junior fellowships? Remote evaluation and face-to-face panel meetings compared

ObjectivesTo test a simplified evaluation of fellowship proposals by analyzing the agreement of funding decisions with the official evaluation, and to examine the use of a lottery-based decision for proposals of similar quality. DesignThe study involved 134 junior fellowship proposals (Postdoc.Mobility). The official method used two panel reviewers who independently scored the application, followed by triage and discussion of selected applications in a panel. Very competitive/uncompetitive proposals were directly funded/rejected without discussion. The simplified procedure used the scores of the two panel members, with or without the score of an additional, third expert. Both methods could further use a lottery to decide on applications of similar quality close to the funding threshold. The same funding rate was applied, and the agreement between the two methods analyzed. SettingSwiss National Science Foundation (SNSF). ParticipantsPostdoc.Mobility panel reviewers and additional expert reviewers. Primary outcome measurePer cent agreement between the simplified and official evaluation method with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). ResultsThe simplified procedure based on three reviews agreed in 80.6% (95% CI 73.9-87.3) with the official funding outcome. The agreement was 86.6% (95% CI 80.8-92.4) when using the two reviews of the panel members. The agreement between the two methods was lower for the group of applications discussed in the panel (64.2% and 73.1%, respectively), and higher for directly funded/rejected applications (range 96.7% to 100%). The lottery was used in eight (6.0%) of 134 applications (official method), 19 (14.2%) applications (simplified, three reviewers) and 23 (17.2%) applications (simplified, two reviewers). With the simplified procedure, evaluation costs could have been halved and 31 hours of meeting time saved for the two 2019 calls. ConclusionAgreement between the two methods was high. The simplified procedure could represent a viable evaluation method for the Postdoc.Mobility early career instrument at the SNSF.

scientific communication and education↗