Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Biber, S. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Biber, S. A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Predicting Autopsy-Confirmed Neuropathology across Clinical, Neuroimaging, and CSF Biomarkers using Machine Learning

Accurate in vivo prediction of neuropathology is critical for advancing diagnosis and treatment of Alzheimers disease and related dementias (ADRDs). As many individuals with ADRDs have mixed pathologies ({beta}-amyloid, pathologic tau, cerebrovascular disease, vascular brain injury, pathologic TDP-43, hippocampal sclerosis, Lewy bodies), there is interest in determining how accurately we can infer these pathologic changes from clinical data, biofluid assays (e.g., CSF), and neuroimaging. Here we evaluated automated machine learning models trained on data curated by the AD Sequencing Project Phenotype Harmonization Consortium (N=7,894 individuals), to predict 26 autopsy-confirmed neuropathological outcomes. Predictors included in vivo clinical and cognitive composite scores, brain measures from 3D structural MRI and diffusion tensor imaging, image-derived measures of white matter hyperintensities (WMH), and CSF biomarkers. Predictive models were trained using ensemble learning with stratified cross-validation. We assessed performance using Spearmans rank correlation and Matthews correlation coefficient, to accommodate co-occurring pathologic changes. The added value of neuroimaging and CSF versus clinical features alone was quantified. Braak stage was among the most consistently predicted outcomes. CSF biomarkers best predicted {beta}-amyloid and tau pathology, but diffusion MRI metrics best captured vascular brain injury and white matter injury, and outperformed clinical and cognitive measures and anatomical MRI in predicting Lewy body disease. Anatomical measures from structural MRI outperformed standard clinical assessments in assessing neurodegeneration and hippocampal sclerosis, and WMH complemented cognitive measures in predicting TDP-43 pathology. These results establish a baseline for comparing modalities for inferring neuropathology.

neuroscience↗

Sex, racial, and APOE-ϵ4 allele differences in longitudinal white matter microstructure in multiple cohorts of aging and Alzheimer's disease

Structured AbstractO_ST_ABSINTRODUCTIONC_ST_ABSThe effects of sex, race, and Apolipoprotein E (APOE) - Alzheimers disease (AD) risk factors - on white matter integrity are not well characterized. METHODSDiffusion MRI data from nine well-established longitudinal cohorts of aging were free-water (FW)-corrected and harmonized. This dataset included 4,702 participants (age=73.06 {+/-} 9.75) with 9,671 imaging sessions over time. FW and FW-corrected fractional anisotropy (FAFWcorr) were used to assess differences in white matter microstructure by sex, race, and APOE-{varepsilon}4 carrier status. RESULTSSex differences in FAFWcorr in association and projection tracts, racial differences in FAFWcorr in projection tracts, and APOE-{varepsilon}4 differences in FW limbic and occipital transcallosal tracts were most pronounced. DISCUSSIONThere are prominent differences in white matter microstructure by sex, race, and APOE- {varepsilon}4 carrier status. This work adds to our understanding of disparities in AD. Additional work to understand the etiology of these differences is warranted. HighlightsO_LISex, race, and APOE-{varepsilon}4 carrier status relate to white matter microstructural integrity C_LIO_LIFemales generally have lower FAFWcorr compared to males C_LIO_LINon-Hispanic Black adults generally have lower FAFWcorr than non-Hispanic White adults C_LIO_LIAPOE-{varepsilon}4 carriers tended to have higher FW than non-carriers C_LI Research in Context Systematic ReviewThe authors used PubMed and Google Scholar to review literature that used conventional and free-water (FW)-corrected microstructural metrics to evaluate sex, race, and APOE-{varepsilon}4 differences in white matter microstructure. While studies have previously explored differences by sex and APOE-{varepsilon}4 status, less is known about racial differences and no large-scale FW-corrected analysis has been performed. InterpretationSex and race were more associated with FAFWcorr while APOE-{varepsilon}4 status was associated with FW metrics. Association, projection, limbic, and occipital transcallosal tracts showed the greatest differences. Future DirectionFuture studies to determine the biological and social pathways that lead to sex, racial, and APOE-{varepsilon}4 differences are warranted. Consent StatementAll participants provided informed consent in their respective cohort studies.

neuroscience↗