Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bhutani, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Bhutani, K..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Widespread haploid-biased gene expression in mammalian spermatogenesis associated with frequent selective sweeps and evolutionary conflict

1Mendels first law dictates that alleles segregate randomly during meiosis and are distributed to offspring with equal frequency, requiring sperm to be functionally independent of their genetic payload. Developing mammalian spermatids have been thought to accomplish this by freely sharing RNA from virtually all genes through cytoplasmic bridges, equalizing allelic gene expression across different genotypes. Applying single cell RNA sequencing to developing spermatids, we identify a large class of mammalian genes whose allelic expression ratio is informative of the haploid genotype, which we call genoinformative markers (GIMs). 29% of spermatid-expressed genes in mice and 47% in non-human primates are not uniformly shared, and instead show a confident allelic expression bias of at least 2-fold towards the haploid genotype. This property of GIMs was significantly conserved between individuals and between rodents and primates. Consistent with the interpretation of specific RNA localization resulting in incomplete sharing through cytoplasmic bridges, we observe a strong depletion of GIM transcripts from chromatoid bodies, structures involved in shuttling RNA across cytoplasmic bridges, and an enrichment for 3 UTR motifs involved in RNA localization. If GIMs are translated and functional in the context of fertility, they would be able to violate Mendels first law, leading to selective sweeps through a population. Indeed, we show that GIMs are enriched for signatures of positive selection, accounting for dozens of recent mouse, human, and primate selective sweeps. Intense selection at the sperm level risks evolutionary conflict between germline and somatic function, and GIMs show evidence of avoiding this conflict by exhibiting more testis-specific gene expression, paralogs, and isoforms than expression-matched control genes. The widespread existence of GIMs suggests that selective forces acting at the level of individual mammalian sperm are much more frequent than commonly believed. 2 Authors summaryMendels first law dictates that alleles are distributed to offspring with equal frequency, requiring sperm carrying different genetics to be functionally equivalent. Despite a small number of known exceptions to this, it is widely believed that sharing of gene products through cytoplasmic bridges erases virtually all differences between haploid sperm. Here, we show that a large class of mammalian genes are not completely shared across these bridges, therefore causing sperm phenotype to correspond partly to haploid genotype. We term these genes "genoinformative markers" (GIMs) and show that their identity tends to be conserved from rodents to primates. Because some GIMs can link sperm genotype to function, they can be thought of as selfish genetic elements which lead to natural selection between sperm rather than between organisms, a violation of Mendels first law. We find evidence of this biased inheritance, showing that GIMs are strongly enriched for selective sweeps that spread alleles through mouse and human populations. For genes expressed both in sperm and in somatic tissues, this can cause a conflict because optimizing gene function for sperm may be detrimental to its other functions. We show that there is evolutionary pressure to avoid this conflict, as GIMs are strongly enriched for testis-specific gene expression, testis-specific paralogs, and testis-specific isoforms. Therefore, GIMs and sperm-level natural selection may provide an elegant explanation for the peculiarity of testis gene expression patterns, which are an extreme outlier relative to all other tissues.

genetics↗

Modeling prediction error improves power of transcriptome-wide association studies

1Transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) test for associations between imputed gene expression levels and phenotypes in GWAS cohorts using models of transcriptional regulation learned from reference transcriptomes. However, current methods for TWAS only use point estimates of imputed expression and ignore uncertainty in the prediction. We develop a novel two-stage Bayesian regression method which incorporates uncertainty in imputed gene expression and achieves higher power to detect TWAS genes than existing TWAS methods as well as standard methods based on missing value and measurement error theory. We apply our method to GTEx whole blood transcriptomes and GWAS cohorts for seven diseases from the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium and find 45 TWAS genes, of which 17 do not overlap previously reported case-control GWAS or differential expression associations. Surprisingly, we replicate only 2 of 40 previously reported TWAS genes after accounting for uncertainty in the prediction.

genetics↗

Multi-tissue polygenic models for transcriptome-wide association studies

I.Transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) have proven to be a powerful tool to identify genes associated with human diseases by aggregating cis-regulatory effects on gene expression. However, TWAS relies on building predictive models of gene expression, which are sensitive to the sample size and tissue on which they are trained. The Gene Tissue Expression Project has produced reference transcriptomes across 53 human tissues and cell types; however, the data is highly sparse, making it difficult to build polygenic models in relevant tissues for TWAS. Here, we propose fQTL, a multi-tissue, multivariate model for mapping expression quantitative trait loci and predicting gene expression. Our model decomposes eQTL effects into SNP-specific and tissue-specific components, pooling information across relevant tissues to effectively boost sample sizes. In simulation, we demonstrate that our multi-tissue approach outperforms single-tissue approaches in identifying causal eQTLs and tissues of action. Using our method, we fit polygenic models for 13,461 genes, characterized the tissue-specificity of the learned cis-eQTLs, and performed TWAS for Alzheimers disease and schizophrenia, identifying 107 and 382 associated genes, respectively.

genetics↗

Pan-Cancer Analysis Reveals Technical Artifacts in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Germline Variant Calls

The degree to which germline variation drives cancer development and shapes tumor phenotypes remains largely unexplored, possibly due to a lack of large scale publicly available germline data for a cancer cohort. Here we called germline variants on 9,618 cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database representing 31 cancer types. We identified batch effects affecting loss of function (LOF) variant calls that can be traced back to differences in the way the sequence data were generated both within and across cancer types. Overall, LOF indel calls were more sensitive to technical artifacts than LOF Single Nucleotide Variant (SNV) calls. In particular, whole genome amplification of DNA prior to sequencing led to an artificially increased burden of LOF indel calls, which confounded association analyses relating germline variants to tumor type despite stringent indel filtering strategies. Due to the inherent noise we chose to remove all 614 amplified DNA samples, including all acute myeloid leukemia and virtually all ovarian cancer samples, from the final dataset. This study demonstrates how insufficient quality control can lead to false positive germlinetumor type associations and draws attention to the need to be sensitive to problems associated with a lack of uniformity in data generation in TCGA data.\n\nAuthor SummaryCancer research to date has largely focused on genetic aberrations specific to tumor tissue. In contrast, the degree to which germline, or inherited, variation contributes to tumorigenesis remains unclear, possibly due to a lack of accessible germline variant data. In this study we identify germline variants in 9,618 samples using raw germline exome data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). There are substantial differences in the way exome sequence data was generated both across and within cancer types in TCGA. We observe that differences in sequence data generation introduced batch effects, or variation that is due to technical factors not true biological variation, in our variant data. Most notably, we observe that amplification of DNA prior to sequencing resulted in an excess of predicted damaging indel variants. We show how these batch effects can confound germline association analyses if not properly addressed. Our study highlights the difficulties of working with large public genomic datasets like TCGA where samples are collected over time and across data centers, and particularly cautions the use of amplified DNA samples for genetic association analyses.

genomics↗