Biology subjects

Bety, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Bety, J..

11 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Experimental and field evidence indicate that islet-nesting tundra birds experience reduced nest predation and benefit indirectly from high snow goose densities

Landscape features can shape the occurrence and strength of predator-prey interactions by influencing predation risk and prey distribution. In the High Arctic, some bird species select nesting sites with physical features that limit the access by their main terrestrial predator, the arctic fox, though these features do not always provide full protection. We investigated how nest microhabitat characteristics and prey availability modulate nest survival in tundra birds that select pond and lake islets as breeding sites. Over four summers, we analyzed the survival of 132 cackling goose and 55 glaucous gull nests located on islets or on pond and lake shores within a 150 km2 area occupied by a snow goose colony on Bylot Island, Nunavut, Canada. We also analyzed survival of 537 artificial nests deployed over three summers. We found that islets act as partial prey refuges, with higher nest survival rates on islets than on pond and lake shores. Nest survival generally increased with islet distance from shore, but we found little evidence of this effect for cackling geese and glaucous gulls, which avoided nesting on islets near shore. Moreover, water depth surrounding islets had little to no influence for any nest type. Nest mortality was much higher in a year with relatively low snow goose nest density, suggesting a short-term positive indirect effect of this colonial nesting bird on species nesting on islets. Since the arctic fox was virtually the sole predator of artificial nests, our findings indicate that annual variation in nest survival on islets were driven by a shift in fox foraging behavior in response to changes in prey availability across the landscape. Our study, which integrates multi-year monitoring and field experiments, highlights the interplay between microhabitat selection and predator-multi-prey dynamics in the arctic tundra.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2025

Predicting space use patterns of a territorial top predator: from individual movement decisions to Arctic fox space use

O_LIPredicting animal space use could greatly improve our understanding and forecasting of ecological processes. Despite growing interest, the development of predictive space use models amenable to the integration of spatial processes into ecological frameworks have yet to reach their full potential. C_LIO_LIUsing high-resolution tracking data collected at 4-minute intervals from 26 Arctic foxes over five years, we developed a predictive space use model based on a step-selection approach. We assessed fine-scale habitat selection in relation to prey distribution, landscape features, and ecological constraints such as central place foraging and territoriality. We then used these results to build an agent-based model simulating fox space use and evaluated its ability to reproduce observed space use patterns. C_LIO_LIStep-selection analyses confirmed that fox movements were driven by habitat type, goose nest density, distance to den, and avoidance of distance to the home range boundary. Agent-based simulations closely matched empirical tracking data and accurately forecasted fox space use, even for individuals excluded from model parameterization. C_LIO_LIBy developing a predictive model of predator space-use, our study provides a foundation for incorporating additional components of the predation sequence and contributes to more spatially informed approaches in predator-prey ecology. C_LI

ecology↗

bioRxiv2025

Timing matters: phenological constraints and predation shape Arctic community structure

Top-down and bottom-up controls of animal populations are key elements of niche and coexistence theories, but there is still little empirical evidence on how these forces determine species distribution and community assemblies. In Arctic ecosystems, spring snowmelt sets the timing and duration of the snow-free period, thereby controlling food availability, while predation often imposes additional constraints on prey species. The relative importance of these abiotic and biotic filters on distribution is also susceptible to vary with body size. Using 10 years of high-resolution data on all major members of an Arctic vertebrate community and their shared predator, we tested how snowmelt timing interacts with predation to shape species occurrence and community structure. Species occurrence declined with later snowmelt dates, with larger-bodied species being particularly constrained by short snow-free periods. Predation further modulated species occurrence, with responses varying according to body mass. Our findings highlight the combined influence of the phenology of food availability and predation as important filters shaping local community structure. Building on species contrasted responses, we propose a conceptual framework for how phenological constraints and predation jointly shape community assembly in highly seasonal environments.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2024

Integrating predator energetic balance, risk-taking behavior and microhabitat in functional response: Untangling indirect interactions in a multispecies vertebrate community

1O_LIPredator-prey interactions in natural communities are complex, with predators often exploiting multiple prey types and generating indirect interactions among them. Ecological theory has traditionally modeled these interactions using functional responses models which are based on foraging rates, not energy transfers. This approach overlooks how the energy acquisition rate of a predator can alter its behavior and, in turn, the strength of species interactions. C_LIO_LIHere, we integrate predator energetics into a functional response model to represent trade-offs predators face when foraging on prey that vary in risk and abundance across heterogeneous landscapes. We compared model predictions to 20 years of prey species density and reproductive success data. The mechanistic model was parameterized for an Arctic tundra vertebrate community, where the Arctic fox feeds on cyclic lemmings and eggs of sandpipers (non-risky prey) and gulls (risky prey that often nest in partial refuge like islands). In this system, predator-mediated interactions generate apparent mutualism between lemmings and birds, but its strength varies between species, and the mechanisms underlying this interaction remain unclear. C_LIO_LIWe found that fox energetic balance was highly related to lemming density, with a threshold of 89 lemmings per km2 required for a positive energetic balance. Model-predicted gull nest acquisition rates were lowest on islands when the energetic balance of foxes was positive, and highest for nests on the shore when foxes were in deficit. The model that incorporated predator risk-taking behavior and energetic balance produced variation in gull hatching success that most closely matched empirical observations. C_LIO_LIWe documented for the first time that a shift in predator energetic balance, triggering changes in attack and capture probabilities on a risky prey, can be a key mechanism underlying the apparent mutualism between lemmings and gulls. In contrast, for non-risky prey, the indirect effect can be essentially driven by changes in predator movement. These findings highlight how prey characteristics can lead to different mechanisms behind similar indirect interactions. C_LIO_LITaken together, our results indicate that mechanistic models integrating species traits, landscape features, and energy-dependent behavioral adjustments can improve our ability to quantify interaction strengths in natural communities. C_LI

ecology↗

bioRxiv2024

The collective application of shorebird tracking data to conservation

Addressing urgent conservation issues, like the drastic declines of North American migratory birds, requires creative, evidence-based, efficient, and collaborative approaches. Over 50% of monitored North American shorebird populations have lost over 50% of their abundance since 1980. To address these declines, we developed a partnership of scientists and practitioners called the Shorebird Science and Conservation Collective (hereinafter "the Collective"). Here, we present this successful case study as an example for others engaged in translational science. The Collective acts as an intermediary whereby dedicated staff collate and analyze data contributions from scientists to support knowledge requests from conservation practitioners. Data contributions from 74 organizations include over 6.7 million shorebird locations forming movement paths of 3,345 individuals representing 36 species tracked across the Americas. We describe the founding and structure of the Collective and conservation activities we supported in our first two years. As the volume of scientific data on animal movements continues to grow, groups like the Collective can be vital liaisons to rapidly integrate and interpret research to support conservation action.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2022

Predator-mediated interactions through changes in predator home range size can lead to prey local exclusion

1The effects of indirect biotic interactions on species occurrence are difficult to quantify in the wild. In theory, the exclusion of a prey species can occur through the numerical and functional responses of a predator to another prey. Few studies assessed the relative effects of these responses on the net interaction strength between multiple prey sharing common predators, in part because empirically based multi-species functional response models are very rare. To investigate whether the presence of a prey species affects predation rates and population growth rate of another prey species, we used a multi-prey mechanistic model of predation along with a population matrix model. The predation model was parameterized using a combination of behavioral, demographic, and experimental data acquired in an arctic vertebrate community. It includes the arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus), a predator feeding primarily on small mammals as well as eggs of various bird species such as sandpipers and colonial nesting geese. Our results showed that the positive effects of the presence of a goose colony on sandpiper nesting success (due to the handling time of goose eggs by the predator) were outweighed by the negative effect of an increase in fox density. The numerical response of the arctic fox was driven by a reduction in home range size in the goose colony. As a result, the net interaction from the presence of geese was negative. Our results also showed that this interaction could lead to local exclusion of sandpipers over a range of adult sandpiper annual survival observed in the wild, which is coherent with previous observations of their co-distribution. Our approach takes into account diverse proximate mechanisms underpinning interaction strengths in a multi-prey system and generates novel insights on some of the predator behavioral responses that may influence prey coexistence (and the lack of) in vertebrate communities.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2021

Multi-species mechanistic model of functional response provides new insights into predator-mediated interactions in a vertebrate community

1.AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWPrey handling processes are considered a key driver of short-term positive indirect effects between prey sharing the same predator. However, a growing body of research indicates that predators are rarely limited by such processes in the wild. Density-dependent changes in predator foraging be-havior can also generate positive indirect effects but they are rarely included as explicit functions of prey densities in functional response models. With the aim of untangling proximate drivers of species interactions in natural communities and improve our ability to quantify interaction strength, we extended the Holling multi-species model by including density-dependent changes in predator foraging behavior. Our model, based on species traits and behavior, was inspired by the verte-brate community of the arctic tundra, where the main predator (the arctic fox) is an active forager feeding primarily on cyclic small rodent (lemming) populations and eggs of various tundra-nesting bird species. Short-term positive indirect effects of lemmings on birds have been documented over the circumpolar Arctic but the underlying proximate mechanisms remain poorly known. We used a unique data set, containing high-frequency GPS tracking, accelerometer, behavioral, and experimental data to parameterize the multi-species model, and a 15-year time series of prey densities and bird nesting success to evaluate inter-action strength between species. Our results showed that: (i) prey handling processes play a minor role in our system and (ii) density-dependent changes in predator foraging behavior can be the proximate drivers of a predominant predator-mediated interaction observed in the arctic tundra. Mechanisms outlined in our study have been little studied and may play a significant role in natural systems. We hope that our study will provide a useful starting point to build mechanistic models of predation, and we think that our approach could conceivably be applied to a broad range of food webs.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2020

Derivation of predator functional responses using a mechanistic approach in a natural system

The functional response is central to our understanding of any predator-prey system as it establishes the link between trophic levels. Most functional responses are evaluated using phenomenological models linking predator acquisition rate and prey density. However, our ability to measure functional responses using such an approach is often limited in natural systems and the use of inaccurate functions can profoundly affect the outcomes of population and community models. Here, we develop a mechanistic model based on extensive data to assess the functional response of a generalist predator, the arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus), to various tundra prey species (lemmings and the nests of geese, passerines and sandpipers). We found that predator acquisition rates derived from the mechanistic model were consistent with field observations. Although sigmoidal functional responses were previously used to model fox-prey population dynamics, none of our simulations resulted in a saturating response in all prey species. Our results highlight the importance of predator searching components in predator-prey interactions, especially predator speed, while predator acquisition rates were not limited by handling processes. By combining theory with field observations, our study provides evidences that predator acquisition rate is not systematically limited at the highest prey densities observed in a natural system. We reinforce the idea that functional response categories, typically types I, II, and III, should be considered as particular cases along a continuum. Specific functions derived with a mechanistic approach for a range of densities observed in natural communities should improve our ability to model and understand predator-prey systems.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2020

The predator activity landscape predicts the anti-predator behavior and distribution of prey in a tundra community

Predation shapes communities through consumptive and non-consumptive effects, where in the latter prey respond to perceived predation risk through risk management strategies occurring at different spatial and temporal scales. The landscape of fear concept is useful to better understand how predation risk affects prey behavioral decisions and distribution, and more generally the spatial dimension of predator-prey relationships. We assessed the effects of the predation risk landscape in a terrestrial Arctic community, where arctic fox is the main predator of ground-nesting bird species. Using high frequency GPS data, we developed a predator activity landscape resulting from fox space use patterns, and validated with an artificial prey experiment that it generated a predation risk landscape. We then investigated the effects of the fox activity landscape on multiple prey, by assessing the anti-predator behavior of a primary prey (snow goose) and the nest distribution of several incidental prey. Areas highly used by foxes were associated with a stronger level of nest defense by snow geese. We further found a lower probability of occurrence of incidental prey nests in areas highly used by foxes, but only for species nesting in habitats easily accessible to foxes. Species nesting in refuges consisting of micro-habitats limiting fox accessibility, like islets, did not respond to the fox activity landscape. Consistent with the scale of the fox activity landscape, this result reflected the capacity of refuges to allow bird nesting without regard to predation risk in the surrounding area. We demonstrated the value of using predator space use patterns to infer spatial variation in predation risk and better understand its effects on prey in landscape of fear studies. We also exposed the diversity of prey risk management strategies, hence refining our understanding of the mechanisms driving species distribution and community structure.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2019

No evidence for disruption of global patterns of nest predation in shorebirds

Kubelka et al. (Science, 9 November 2018, p. 680-683) claim that climate change has disrupted patterns of nest predation in shorebirds. They report that predation rates have increased since the 1950s, especially in the Arctic. We describe methodological problems with their analyses and argue that there is no solid statistical support for their claims.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2016

Unexpected diversity in socially synchronized rhythms of shorebirds

The behavioural rhythms of organisms are thought to be under strong selection, influenced by the rhythmicity of the environment1-4. Such behavioural rhythms are well studied in isolated individuals under laboratory conditions1,5, but free-living individuals have to temporally synchronize their activities with those of others, including potential mates, competitors, prey and predators6-10. Individuals can temporally segregate their daily activities (e.g. prey avoiding predators, subordinates avoiding dominants) or synchronize their activities (e.g. group foraging, communal defence, pairs reproducing or caring for offspring)6-9,11. The behavioural rhythms that emerge from such social synchronization and the underlying evolutionary and ecological drivers that shape them remain poorly understood5-7,9. Here, we address this in the context of biparental care, a particularly sensitive phase of social synchronization12 where pair members potentially compromise their individual rhythms. Using data from 729 nests of 91 populations of 32 biparentally-incubating shorebird species, where parents synchronize to achieve continuous coverage of developing eggs, we report remarkable within- and between-species diversity in incubation rhythms. Between species, the median length of one parents incubation bout varied from 1 - 19 hours, while period length-the time in which a parents probability to incubate cycles once between its highest and lowest value - varied from 6 - 43 hours. The length of incubation bouts was unrelated to variables reflecting energetic demands, but species relying on crypsis (the ability to avoid detection by other animals) had longer incubation bouts than those that are readily visible or actively protect their nest against predators. Rhythms entrainable to the 24-h light-dark cycle were less prevalent at high latitudes and absent in 18 species. Our results indicate that even under similar environmental conditions and despite 24-h environmental cues, social synchronization can generate far more diverse behavioural rhythms than expected from studies of individuals in captivity5-7,9. The risk of predation, not the risk of starvation, may be a key factor underlying the diversity in these rhythms.

animal behavior and cognition↗