Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bertrand, O. J. N.

Publications and source records attributed to Bertrand, O. J. N..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Navigating in clutter: How bumblebees optimize flight behaviour through experience

Bumblebees are excellent navigators that travel long distances while retracing paths to known locations. They forage not only in open terrains but also in cluttered environments where obstacles force them to deviate from direct paths. This study investigates the underexplored aspect of how bees become experienced foragers and optimize flight behaviour in cluttered terrains. We recorded flight trajectories of novice bees inexperienced in navigating cluttered environments and monitored their behavioural performance as they gained experience on subsequent foraging trips through numerous obstacles. By controlling for experience levels, we analysed how flight characteristics evolve with increasing expertise. Successful navigation in cluttered terrains requires avoiding collisions with obstacles. This is only possible if these can be detected by visual features such as the retinal displacement of contrast edges. Obstacles which are harder to detect and to avoid by the bees can affect their flight performance. By introducing transparent objects into our dense environment, we challenged collision avoidance and learning mechanisms, analysing their impact on flight optimization under different environmental conditions. Our findings reveal that experienced bees fly similar paths through clutter and quickly adapt their flight regardless of their training environment. However, the specific paths followed are influenced by environmental conditions. Transparent objects primarily affect naive bees flight patterns while having minimal impact on flight optimization, suggesting that the efficient flights of experienced bees result not solely from reflexive collision avoidance but from learning and previous experience in cluttered environments.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Bumblebees increase their learning flight altitude in dense environments

Bumblebees rely on visual memories acquired during the first outbound flights to relocate their nest. While these learning flights have been extensively studied in sparse environments with few objects, little is known about how bees adapt their flight in more dense, cluttered, settings that better mimic their natural habitats. Here we investigated how environmental complexity influences the first outbound flights of bumblebees. In a large arena we tracked the bees 3D positions to examine the flight patterns, body orientations, and nest fixations across environmental conditions characterised by different object constellations around the nest entrance. In cluttered environments, bees prioritised altitude gain over horizontal distance, suggesting a strategy to overcome obstacles and visual clutter. Body orientation patterns became more diverse in dense environments, indicating a balance between nest-oriented learning and obstacle avoidance. Notably, bees consistently preferred to fixate the location of the nest entrance from elevated positions above the dense environment across all conditions. Our results reveal significant changes in the 3D flight structure, body orientations, and nest fixation behaviours as object density increases. This highlights the importance of considering 3D space and environmental complexity in understanding insect navigation.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Bumblebees locate goals in 3D with absolute height estimation from ventral optic flow

When foraging, flying animals like bees are often required to change their flight altitude from close to the ground to above the height of the vegetation to reach their nest or a food source. While the mechanisms of navigating towards a goal in two dimensions are well investigated, the explicit use of height as a source for navigation in three dimensions remains mostly unknown. Our study aims to unravel which strategies bumble-bees use for height estimation and whether they rely on global or local cues. We expanded a 2D goal localization paradigm, where a goal location is indicated by cylindrical landmarks, to the third dimension by using spherical landmarks to indicate a feeders position in 3D and examined the search pattern of bumblebees. Additionally, we assessed the ability of bees to estimate the height of a feeder based on local landmarks and global references such as the ground floor. The search distribution for a feeders position in 3D was less spatially concentrated compared to in 2D. Assessing the bees height estimation ability, we found that bees could estimate a feeders height using the ground floor as a reference. However, the feeder needed to be sufficiently close to the ground floor for the bees to choose correctly. When bumblebees are faced with the challenge of foraging in a 3D environment where the height of a food source and landmark cues are important, they demonstrate the ability to learn and return to a specific flower height. This suggests they rely on ventral optic flow for goal height estimation in bumblebees.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Switching perspective: Comparing ground-level and bird's-eye views for bees navigating clutter

Animals navigating in three dimensions encounter different perspectives of their world, often transitioning from birds eye views at higher altitudes to ground views closer to the ground. How they integrate this information to pinpoint a goal location is virtually unknown. Here we tested the ability of bumblebees to use both types of views when homing in a dense environment in the vicinity of their inconspicuous nest entrance. Our combined modelling and experimental approach examined various views for localising a goal in dense settings. Whereas, birds-eye views performed best in simulations of current nest-centered snapshot homing models, behavioural experiments revealed that bumblebees predominantly relied on ground views when pinpointing nest entrances in dense environments. These findings reveal the limitations of snapshot-homing models and suggest that bumblebees use a combination of navigational tools to successfully find their way home in dense environments. This is not only relevant for understanding bee navigation, but also for other animals and humans navigating in 3D as well as the development of technologies inspired by natural systems, such as autonomous flying robots.

animal behavior and cognition↗

Not seeing the forest for the trees: Combination of path integration and landmark cues in human virtual navigation

IntroductionIn order to successfully move from place to place, our brain often combines sensory inputs from various sources by dynamically weighting spatial cues according to their reliability and relevance for a given task. Two of the most important cues in navigation are the spatial arrangement of landmarks in the environment, and the continuous path integration of travelled distances and changes in direction. Several studies have shown that Bayesian integration of cues provides a good explanation for navigation in environments dominated by small numbers of easily identifiable landmarks. However, it remains largely unclear how cues are combined in more complex environments. MethodsTo investigate how humans process and combine landmarks and path integration in complex environments, we conducted a series of triangle completion experiments in virtual reality, in which we varied the number of landmarks from an open steppe to a dense forest, thus going beyond the spatially simple environments that have been studied in the past. We analysed spatial behaviour at both the population and individual level with linear regression models and developed a computational model, based on maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), to infer the underlying combination of cues. ResultsOverall homing performance was optimal in an environment containing three landmarks arranged around the goal location. With more than three landmarks, individual differences between participants in the use of cues are striking. For some, the addition of landmarks does not worsen their performance, whereas for others it seems to impair their use of landmark information. DiscussionIt appears that navigation success in complex environments depends on the ability to identify the correct clearing around the goal location, suggesting that some participants may not be able to see the forest for the trees.

neuroscience↗