Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bendlin, B.

Publications and source records attributed to Bendlin, B..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Self-reported health behaviors and longitudinal cognitive performance: Results from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer’s Prevention

BackgroundStudies have suggested associations between self-reported engagement in health behaviors and reduced risk of cognitive decline. Most studies explore these relationships using one health behavior, often cross-sectionally or with dementia as the outcome. In this study, we explored whether several individual self-reported health behaviors were associated with cognitive decline when considered simultaneously, using data from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimers Prevention (WRAP), an Alzheimers disease risk-enriched cohort who were non-demented and in late midlife at baseline.\n\nMethodWe analyzed longitudinal cognitive data from 828 participants in WRAP, with a mean age at baseline cognitive assessment of 57 (range = 36-78, sd = 6.8) and an average of 6.3 years (standard deviation = 1.9, range = 2-10) of follow-up. The primary outcome was a multi-domain cognitive composite, and secondary outcomes were immediate/delayed memory and executive function composites. Predictors of interest were self-reported measures of physical activity, cognitive activity, adherence to a Mediterranean-style diet (MIND), and interactions with each other and age. We conducted linear mixed effects analyses within an Information-theoretic (IT) model averaging (MA) approach on a set of models including covariates and combinations of these 2- and 3-way interactions. The IT approach was selected due to the large number of interactions of interest and to avoid pitfalls of traditional model selection approaches.\n\nResultsModel-averaged results identified no significant modifiable behavior*age interactions in relationship to the primary composite outcome. In secondary outcomes, higher MIND diet scores associated with slower decline in executive function. Men showed faster decline than women on delayed memory, independent of health behaviors. There were no other significant interactions among any other health behaviors and cognitive trajectories.\n\nConclusionsWhen multiple covariates and health behaviors were considered simultaneously, there were limited weak associations with cognitive decline in this age range. These results may be explained alone or in combination by three alternative explanations: 1) the range of cognitive decline is in middle age is too small to observe relationships with health behaviors, 2) the putative associations of these health behaviors on cognition may not be robust in this age range, or 3) the self-reported measures of the health behaviors may not be optimal for predicting cognitive decline. More study may be needed that incorporates sensitive measures of health behaviors, AD biomarker profiles, and/or other disease comorbidities.

neuroscience↗

Age-accelerated cognitive decline in asymptomatic adults with CSF β-amyloid

ObjectiveCompare cognitive and hippocampal volume (HCV) trajectories in asymptomatic middle-aged and older adults with positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) markers of {beta}-amyloid (A{beta}) or tau to adults without an AD-associated biomarker profile.\n\nMethod392 adults enrolled in a longitudinal cohort study (Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimers Prevention or Wisconsin Alzheimers Disease Research Center) completed a lumbar puncture and at least two biennial or annual neuropsychological evaluations. Cutoffs for A{beta}42, total tau, and phosphorylated tau were developed via receiver operating characteristic curve analyses on a sample of 78 participants (38 dementia, 40 controls). These cutoffs were applied to a separate sample of 314 cognitively healthy adults (mean age at CSF collection = 61.5) and mixed-effects regression analyses tested linear and quadratic interactions of biomarker group x age at each visit on cognitive and HCV outcomes.\n\nResults215 participants (69%) were biomarker negative (preclinical AD Stage 0), 46 (15%) were A{beta}+ only (preclinical AD Stage 1), 25 (8%) were A{beta}+ and tau+ (preclinical AD Stage 2), and 28 (9%) were tau+ only. Both Stage 1 and Stage 2 groups exhibited greater rates of linear decline on story memory and processing speed measures, and non-linear decline on list-learning and set-shifting measures compared to Stage 0. The tau+ only group did not significantly differ from Stage 0 in rates of cognitive decline.\n\nConclusionIn an asymptomatic at-risk cohort, elevated CSF A{beta} (with or without elevated tau) was associated with greater rates of cognitive decline, with the specific pattern of decline varying across cognitive measures.

neuroscience↗