Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Benbow, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Benbow, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Dominant α-tubulin mutations rescue tauopathy neurodegenerative phenotypes in C. elegans

Tau protein, the primary component in neurofibrillary tangles characteristic of Alzheimers Disease and related dementia disorders, normally regulates microtubule growth and stability. While tau dysfunction contributes to the progression of tauopathies, the role of microtubules in disease has remained unclear. Through forward genetic screening in Caenorhabditis elegans tauopathy models, we found multiple tubulin gene mutations that rescue tau-mediated neurodegeneration. Whole animal behavioral and in vitro biochemical assays were employed to characterize mutation-driven effects on neuron function, neurodegeneration, and effects on tubulin and tau proteins as well as microtubule function. Mutant tubulin genes were found to confer different levels of suppression correlating with the level of mutant gene expression. Mutant tubulins did not drastically alter total tau protein levels, tau phosphorylation or aggregation, however tau-induced neurodegeneration was rescued. The suppression of tau toxicity by tubulin gene mutations cannot be explained by changes in tau or tubulin expression, tau phosphorylation, or tau aggregation state. Rather the tubulin mutations appear to act by influencing global microtubule properties. In vitro experiments using C. elegans tubulin in semi-isolated and isolated contexts have indicated changes to microtubule properties without observable changes to tau-tubulin affinity. This work suggests that manipulation of microtubules can rescue tauopathy even when pathological tau species persist, supporting the importance of understanding microtubule contributions to disease progression and investigation into microtubule targeted gene therapy or small molecule approaches for tauopathy intervention.

neuroscience↗

Defining 'Destructive fishing': a lack of consensus inhibits effective global policy

The term "destructive fishing" appears in multiple international policy instruments intended to improve outcomes for marine biodiversity, coastal communities and sustainable fisheries. However, the meaning of "destructive fishing" is often vague, limiting effectiveness in policy. Therefore, in this study we systematically reviewed the use of "destructive fishing" in three record types: academic literature, media articles, and policy documents between 1976-2020. A more detailed analysis was performed on sub-sets of these records, considering the extent to which the term is characterised, geographic distribution of use, and specific impacts and practices associated with the term. We found that use of "destructive fishing" relative to the generic term fisheries has increased since the 1990s. Records focused predominantly on fishing practices in South-eastern Asia, followed by Southern Asia and Europe. The term was characterised in detail in only 15% of records. Habitat damage and blast/poison fishing were the most associated ecological impacts and gear/practices, respectively. Bottom trawling and unspecified net fishing were regularly linked to destructive fishing. Importantly, the three record types use the term differently. Academic literature tends to specifically articulate the negative impacts, while media articles focus generally on associated gears/practices. Significant regional variation also exists in how the term is used and what phenomena it is applied to. This study provides evidence and recommendations to inform stakeholders in any future pursuit of a unified definition of "destructive fishing" to support more meaningful implementation of global sustainability goals.

ecology↗