Biology subjects

Beger, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Beger, M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Operationalizing ecological connectivity in spatial conservation planning with Marxan Connect

O_LIGlobally, protected areas are being established to protect biodiversity and to promote ecosystem resilience. The typical spatial conservation planning process leading to the creation of these protected areas focuses on representation and replication of ecological features, often using decision support systems such as Marxan. Unfortunately, Marxan currently requires manual input or specialised scripts to explicitly consider ecological connectivity, a property critical to metapopulation persistence and resilience.\nC_LIO_LI\"Marxan Connect\" is a new open source, open access Graphical User Interface (GUI) designed to assist conservation planners in the systematic operationalization of ecological connectivity in protected area network planning.\nC_LIO_LIMarxan Connect is able to incorporate estimates of demographic connectivity (e.g. derived from tracking data, dispersal models, or genetics) or structural landscape connectivity (e.g. isolation by resistance). This is accomplished by calculating metapopulation-relevant connectivity metrics (e.g. eigenvector centrality) and treating those as conservation features, or using the connectivity data as a spatial dependency amongst sites to be included in the prioritization process.\nC_LIO_LIMarxan Connect allows a wide group of users to incorporate directional ecological connectivity into conservation plans. The least-cost conservation solutions provided by Marxan Connect, combined with ecologically relevant post-hoc testing, are more likely to support persistent and resilient metapopulations (e.g. fish stocks) and provide better protection for biodiversity than if connectivity is ignored.\nC_LI

ecology↗

bioRxiv2017

A Theory For Ecological Survey Methods To Map Individual Distributions

Spatially-explicit approaches are widely recommended for ecosystem management. The quality of the data, such as presence/absence or habitat maps, affects the management actions recommended, and is, therefore, key to management success. However, available data are often biased and incomplete. Previous studies have advanced ways to resolve data bias and missing data, but questions remain about how we design ecological surveys to develop a dataset through field surveys. Ecological surveys may have multiple spatial scales, including the spatial extent of the target ecosystem (observation window), the resolution for mapping individual distributions (mapping unit), and the survey area within each mapping unit (sampling unit). We developed an ecological survey method for mapping individual distributions by applying spatially-explicit stochastic models. We used spatial point processes to describe individual spatial placements using either random or clustering processes. We then designed ecological surveys with different spatial scales and individual detectability. We found that the choice of mapping unit affected the presence mapped fraction, and the fraction of the total individuals covered by the presence mapped patches. Tradeoffs were found between these quantities and the map resolution, associated with equivalent asymptotic behaviors for both metrics at sufficiently small and large mapping unit scales. Our approach enabled consideration of the effect of multiple spatial scales in surveys, and estimation of the survey outcomes such as the presence mapped fraction and the number of individuals situated in the presence detected units. The developed theory may facilitate management decision-making and inform the design of monitoring and data gathering.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2017

Spatially Explicit Approach To Population Abundance Estimation In Field Surveys

The abundance of species is a fundamental consideration in ecology and conservation biology. Although broad models have been proposed to estimate the population abundance using existing data, available data is often limited. With no information available, a population estimation will rely on time consuming field surveys. Typically, time is a critical constraint in conservation and often management decisions must be made quickly under the data limited situation. Depending on time and budgetary constraints, the required accuracy of field survey changes significantly. Hence, it is desirable to set up an effective survey design to minimize time and effort of sampling given required accuracy. We examine a spatially-explicit approach to population estimation using spatial point processes, enabling us to explicitly and consistently discuss various sampling designs. We find that the accuracy of abundance estimation varies with both ecological factors and survey design. Although the spatial scale of sampling does not affect estimation accuracy when the underlying individual distribution is random, it decreases with the sampled unit size if individuals tend to form clusters. These results are derived analytically and checked numerically. Obtained insights provide a benchmark to predict the quality of population estimation, and improve survey designs for ecological studies and conservation.

ecology↗