Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Beech, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Beech, J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Tumbleweed: an artificial motor protein that walks along a DNA track

Summary ParagraphMolecular motors are fundamental to life1-6 because of their ability to convert chemical energy into mechanical work, an ability that is conferred by the chemical and structural complexity of their constituent proteins. Scientists have long sought to create artificial protein motors that may reveal insights into how biological motors function. While artificial molecular motors based on small molecules7 and DNA8,9 have been developed, creating an artificial motor protein has remained an elusive goal in synthetic biology10. Here we demonstrate the realization of an artificial protein motor called Tumbleweed (TW) that walks directionally along a DNA track under external control. TW consists of three legs, each with a ligand-gated DNA-binding domain that enables selective interaction with specific sites along a DNA track11. Using single-molecule fluorescence assays and a programmable microfluidic device, we show that TW steps directionally along a designed DNA track in response to a defined sequence of ligand inputs. We built our TW molecular walker using a modular approach, combining existing proteins with known properties to achieve emergent motor function, similar to how Nature evolves new proteins. Our design strategy thus offers a a platform for engineering advanced and dynamic protein functionality. Our demonstration of TW walking represents a step toward developing fully autonomous protein motors and opens new avenues for uncovering and leveraging the principles by which biological motors transduce chemical energy into motion.

biophysics↗

The anthropometric and physical qualities of womens rugby league Super League and international players; identifying differences in playing position and standard

Participation in womens rugby league has been growing since the foundation of the English womens rugby league Super League in 2017. However, the evidence base to inform womens rugby league remains sparse. This study provides the largest quantification of anthropometric and physical qualities of womens rugby league players to date, identifying differences between positions (forwards & backs) and playing standard (Womens Super League [WSL] vs. International). The height, weight, body composition, lower body strength, jump height, speed and aerobic capacity of 207 players were quantified during the pre-season period. Linear mixed models and effects sizes were used to determine differences between positions and standards. Forwards were significantly (p < 0.05) heavier (forwards: 82.5 {+/-} 14.8kg; backs: 67.7 {+/-} 9.2kg) and have a greater body fat % (forwards: 37.7 {+/-} 6.9%; backs: 30.4 {+/-} 6.3%) than backs. Backs had significantly greater lower body power measured via jump height (forwards: 23.5 {+/-} 4.4cm; backs: 27.6 {+/-} 4.9cm), speed over 10m (forwards: 2.12 {+/-} 0.14s; backs: 1.98 {+/-} 0.11s), 20m (forwards: 3.71 {+/-} 0.27s; backs: 3.46 {+/-} 0.20s), 30m (forwards: 5.29 {+/-} 0.41s; backs: 4.90 {+/-} 0.33s), 40m (forwards: 6.91 {+/-} 0.61s; backs: 6.33 {+/-} 0.46s) and aerobic capacity (forwards: 453.4 {+/-} 258.8m; backs: 665.0 {+/-} 298.2m) than forwards. Additionally, international players were found to have greater anthropometric and physical qualities in comparison to their WSL counterparts. This study adds to the limited evidence base surrounding the anthropometric and physical qualities of elite womens rugby league players. Comparative values for anthropometric and physical qualities are provided which practitioners may use to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of players, informing training programs to prepare players for the demands of womens rugby league.

physiology↗