Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Beausejour, J. P.

Publications and source records attributed to Beausejour, J. P..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

CHANGES IN MUSCLE QUALITY FOLLOWING SHORT-TERM RESISTANCE TRAINING IN OLDER ADULTS: A COMPARISON OF ECHO INTENSITY AND TEXTURE ANALYSIS

BackgroundSkeletal muscle echo intensity (EI) is associated with functional outcomes in older adults, but resistance training interventions have shown mixed results. Texture analysis has been proposed as a novel approach for assessing muscle quality, as it captures spatial relationships between pixels. PurposeTo examine changes in first-order (EI) and second-order (texture) features of muscle quality following lower-body resistance training in older adults. MethodsTwelve older adults (2 males, 10 females; mean {+/-} SD age = 70 {+/-} 5 years) completed 6 weeks of progressive resistance training, consisting of twice-weekly sessions at 85% of estimated 1RM. Pre- and post-intervention assessments included ultrasound imaging of the rectus femoris (RF) and vastus lateralis (VL), 5-repetition maximum (5RM) leg extension strength, and maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) force. Ultrasound images were analyzed for EI and texture features using gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) analysis. ResultsLarge improvements were observed in 5RM leg extension strength (p < 0.001, d = 2.09), MVIC force (p = 0.006, d = 0.969), and RF EI (uncorrected: p = 0.003, d = 0.727; corrected: p = 0.012, d = 0.864). No significant changes were observed in muscle size, VL EI, or texture features for either muscle. ConclusionsShort-term resistance training improved strength and RF muscle quality as measured by EI. However, texture analysis features were not sensitive to changes following training. These findings suggest that traditional EI measures may be more appropriate than texture analysis for tracking changes in muscle quality following resistance training in older adults. NEW & NOTEWORTHYWe studied muscle quality changes after 6 weeks of resistance training in older adults, comparing traditional EI to texture analysis. Despite significant strength gains, only RF EI improved, with minimal changes in muscle size, VL EI, or texture parameters. Surprisingly, texture analysis was less sensitive than traditional EI in detecting muscle quality changes. Our results suggest that conventional EI measures may be more suitable for evaluating short-term adaptations to resistance training in older adults.

physiology↗

A Comparison of Techniques to Determine Active Motor Threshold for Quadriceps Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Research

The determination of active motor threshold (AMT) is a critical step in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) research protocols involving voluntary muscle contractions. As AMT is frequently determined using an absolute electromyographic (EMG) threshold (e.g., 200{micro}V peak-to-peak amplitude), wide variation in EMG recordings across participants has given reason to consider a relative threshold (e.g., = 2x background EMG) for AMT determination. However, these approaches have not been systemically compared. PURPOSE: We sought to compare the AMT estimations derived from absolute and relative criteria commonly used to determine AMT in the quadriceps muscles, and assess the test-retest reliability of each approach (absolute = 200{micro}V vs. relative = 2x background EMG). METHODS: Eighteen young adults (9 males and 9 females; mean {+/-} SD age = 23 {+/-} 2 years) visited the research laboratory on two occasions. All testing was conducted on the dominant limb. During each laboratory visit, maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) quadriceps torque was measured, with all subsequent TMS procedures conducted as participants maintained 10% of MVIC torque. AMT was derived from each criterion using motor evoked potentials recorded from the vastus lateralis (VL) and defined as the lowest stimulator output (SO%) needed to meet the specified criteria within [&ge;] 5/10 pulses. The order of criteria (i.e., absolute vs. relative) was randomized during the first laboratory visit, and counterbalanced during the second visit. A paired samples t-test, 95% confidence intervals and the effect size were used to compare mean differences in AMT estimations obtained from each criterion during the second laboratory visit. Paired samples t-tests, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC2,1), standard errors of measurement (SEMs), and the minimal difference (MD) scores were calculated to assess test-retest reliability of each AMT criterion. RESULTS: Differences between the AMT criteria were small and not statistically significant (absolute criterion mean = 48.9%, relative criterion mean = 47.4%; p = .309, Cohens d = 0.247). The absolute criterion demonstrated moderate to excellent reliability (ICC2,1= .866 [0.648 - 0.950], SEM = 7.9%, MD = 10.4%), but higher AMTs were observed in the second visit compared to the first (p = 0.043). The relative criteria demonstrated good-to-excellent test-retest reliability (ICC2,1= .894 [0.746 - 0.959], SEM = 6.9%, MD = 8.9%) and AMTs were not different between visits (p = 0.420). CONCLUSIONQuantifying AMT with an absolute voltage threshold of 200{micro}V peak-to-peak amplitude and a relative voltage threshold 2x background EMG resulted in similar estimations within a single testing session. However, the relative voltage criterion demonstrated superior test-retest reliability. TMS researchers aiming to track corticospinal characteristics across visits should consider implementing relative criterion approaches during their AMT determination protocol.

neuroscience↗