Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bayanjargal, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Bayanjargal, A..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

LSD1 Performs Demethylase-Independent and Context-Specific Roles in Ewing Sarcoma

Lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1), encoded by the gene KDM1A, is overexpressed and correlates with poor patient prognosis in Ewing sarcoma. LSD1 and the pathognomonic fusion oncoprotein, EWSR1::FLI1, colocalize throughout the genome, suggesting LSD1 is a critical co-regulator driving the progression of Ewing sarcoma. However, therapeutic targeting of LSD1 by competitive and noncompetitive inhibitors has yielded mixed results. Irreversible, enzymatic inhibition seems ineffective, but reversible noncompetitive inhibition has predominant off target mechanisms, leaving open the question of LSD1 function in Ewing sarcoma. Here we take a robust approach through multiple methods of depletion in multiple EwS cell lines to define enzymatic and nonenzymatic contributions of LSD1 to transcriptional regulation. We define a core set of 22 genes that are commonly repressed by LSD1 in all cell lines, and that repression of these genes downregulates synapse functioning and e-cadherin target genes. Derepression of these genes with LSD1 loss is an early and sustained genotype in all cell lines tested. We further define distinct gene sets in each cell line that are regulated by enzymatic and nonenzymatic LSD1 activity and find repression of e-cadherin target genes to be nonenzymatically regulated. This finding supports the growing body of evidence that in addition to their canonical catalytic activity, chromatin regulatory enzymes serve essential noncanonical roles as well. Furthermore, we uncovered evidence through use of the irreversible inhibitor OG-L002 that 2D cytotoxicity and proliferation assays may be insufficient to determine Ewing sarcoma response to LSD1 inhibition. SIGNIFICANCEHere we address a long-standing question in the field surrounding LSD1 and define the distinct enzymatic and nonenzymatic functions of LSD1 in Ewing sarcoma. In doing so, we have created a robust data set using genetic and pharmacological techniques in multiple models to thoroughly characterize LSD1 function in Ewing sarcoma cell lines.

cancer biology↗

Seclidemstat blocks the transcriptional function of multiple FET-fusion oncoproteins

Genes encoding the RNA-binding proteins FUS, EWSR1, and TAF15 (FET proteins) are involved in chromosomal translocations in rare sarcomas. FET-rearranged sarcomas are often aggressive malignancies affecting patients of all ages. New therapies are needed. These translocations fuse the 5 portion of the FET gene with a 3 partner gene encoding a transcription factor (TF). The resulting fusion proteins are oncogenic TFs with a FET protein low complexity domain (LCD) and a DNA binding domain. FET fusion proteins have proven stubbornly difficult to target directly and promising strategies target critical co-regulators. One candidate is lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1). LSD1 is recruited by multiple FET fusions, including EWSR1::FLI1. LSD1 promotes EWSR1::FLI1 activity and treatment with the noncompetitive inhibitor SP-2509 blocks EWSR1::FLI1 transcriptional function. A similar molecule, seclidemstat (SP-2577), is currently in clinical trials for FET-rearranged sarcomas (NCT03600649). However, whether seclidemstat has pharmacological activity against FET fusions has not been demonstrated. Here, we evaluate the in vitro potency of seclidemstat against multiple FET-rearranged sarcoma cell lines, including Ewing sarcoma, desmoplastic small round cell tumor, clear cell sarcoma, and myxoid liposarcoma. We also define the transcriptomic effects of seclidemstat treatment and evaluated the activity of seclidemstat against FET fusion transcriptional regulation. Seclidemstat showed potent activity in cell viability assays across FET-rearranged sarcomas and disrupted the transcriptional function of all tested fusions. Though epigenetic and targeted inhibitors are unlikely to be effective as a single agents in the clinic, these data suggest seclidemstat remains a promising new treatment strategy for patients with FET-rearranged sarcomas. SIGNIFICANCEHere, we show the noncompetitive inhibitor, seclidemstat, has in vitro activity against multiple FET fusion proteins that cause a number of rare and aggressive sarcomas. These data represent one of the largest analyses of FET fusion activity across multiple malignancies and are a valuable resource for those studying FET-rearranged sarcomas.

cancer biology↗

DBD-α4 helix of EWS::FLI is required for GGAA microsatellite binding that underlies genome regulation in Ewing sarcoma

Ewing sarcoma is the second most common bone cancer in children and young adults. In 85% of patients, a translocation between chromosomes 11 and 22 results in a potent fusion oncoprotein, EWSR1::FLI1. EWSR1::FLI1 is the only genetic alteration in an otherwise unaltered genome of Ewing sarcoma tumors. The EWSR1 portion of the protein is an intrinsically disordered domain involved in transcriptional regulation by EWSR1::FLI1. The FLI portion of the fusion contains a DNA binding domain shown to bind core GGAA motifs and GGAA repeats. A small alpha-helix in the DNA binding domain of FLI1, DBD-4 helix, is critical for the transcription function of EWSR1::FLI1. In this study, we aimed to understand the mechanism by which the DBD-4 helix promotes transcription, and therefore oncogenic transformation. We utilized a multi-omics approach to assess chromatin organization, active chromatin marks, genome binding, and gene expression in cells expressing EWSR1::FLI1 constructs with and without the DBD-4 helix. Our studies revealed DBD-4 helix is crucial for cooperative binding of EWSR1::FLI1 at GGAA microsatellites. This binding underlies many aspects of genome regulation by EWSR1::FLI1 such as formation of TADs, chromatin loops, enhancers and productive transcription hubs.

cancer biology↗

Isoform-specific characterization implicates alternative splicing in APOBEC3B as a mechanism restricting APOBEC-mediated mutagenesis

APOBEC3A (A3A) and APOBEC3B (A3B) enzymes drive APOBEC-mediated mutagenesis, but the understanding of the regulation of their mutagenic activity remains limited. Here, we showed that mutagenic and non-mutagenic A3A and A3B enzymes are produced by canonical and alternatively spliced A3A and A3B isoforms, respectively. Notably, increased expression of the canonical A3B isoform, which encodes the mutagenic A3B enzyme, predicted shorter progression-free survival of bladder cancer patients. Expression of the mutagenic A3B isoform was reduced by exon 5 skipping, generating a non-mutagenic A3B isoform. The exon 5 skipping, which was dependent on the interaction between SF3B1 splicing factor and weak branch point sites in intron 4, could be enhanced by an SF3B1 inhibitor, decreasing the production of the mutagenic A3B enzyme. Thus, our results underscore the role of A3B, especially in bladder cancer, and implicate alternative splicing of A3B as a mechanism and therapeutic target to restrict APOBEC-mediated mutagenesis.

genomics↗