Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bay, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Bay, A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

GDNF family receptor alpha-like (GFRAL) expression is restricted to the caudal brainstem

The TGF-{beta} cytokine, growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) is a critical mediator of the physiologic response to a range of cellular stresses. While circulating levels of GDF15 are normally very low, these levels increase substantially under a number of acute and chronic pathogenic states including mycotoxin exposure, infection and cancer. GDF15 controls a range of physiologic outputs including reduced appetite, gastric motility, hyperalgesia, emesis, energy expenditure and immune cell function via the GDNF family receptor alpha-like (GFRAL). While the area postrema and nucleus of the solitary tract (AP/NTS) within the caudal brainstem are the only known sites of Gfral-expressing cells, Gfral may also be expressed in other cell types. We therefore utilized single molecule in-situ hybridizations and genetic mouse models to label Gfral-expressing cells from development to adult mouse. With both approaches, we found Gfral-labelled cells in the brainstem and extremely rare Gfral-labelled cells in peripheral tissues in the mouse under normal physiological conditions. Confirming these findings, single nucleus RNA-sequencing of human tissues demonstrated nearly undetectable levels of Gfral mRNA in sites outside the AP/NTS. Our findings confirm AP/NTS neurons are the major site of Gfral expression.

molecular biology↗

Association between Parkinson’s Disease subtypes and tests of physical function: the 360-degree turn test is most predictive

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSEPeople with Parkinsons disease (PD) present phenotypes that can be characterized as tremor-dominant (TD) or postural instability / gait difficulty (PIGD) subtypes. Differentiation of subtypes allows clinicians to predict the disease course and adjust treatment accordingly. We examined whether brief mobility and balance measures can discriminate PIGD from TD phenotypes.\n\nMETHODSWe performed a cross-sectional study with individuals with PD (N=104). Blinded raters assessed participants with the UPDRS or MDS-UPDRS, and potential predictor variables: 360-degree turn test, one-leg stance, backward perturbation test and tandem walk. Participant were classified as PIGD or TD based on the Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale or the Movement Disorder Society revision (UPDRS or MDS-UPDRS) assessment results. Differences in study variables between subtype groups were assessed with univariate analyses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to investigate the ability of candidate predictor variables to differentiate PD subtypes.\n\nRESULTSMean age and disease duration were 68{+/-}9 and 7{+/-}5 years, respectively, and Hoehn & Yahr Stages I-IV median (1st,3rd quartile) = II (II, III). No differences between subtypes were observed for tandem walk or reactive postural control. PIGD participants performed worse on number of steps (p<0.001) and time to complete (p=0.003) the 360-degree turn test and one-leg stance (p=0.006). ROC curves showed only the 360-degree turn test could discriminate PIGD from TD with high sensitivity.\n\nCONCLUSIONSThe 360-degree turn test requires minimal time to administer and may be useful in mild-moderate PD for distinguishing PIGD from TD subtypes.

neuroscience↗