Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Batist, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Batist, G..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

The clinical, genomic, and transcriptomic landscape of BRAF mutant cancers

BackgroundBRAF mutations are classified into 4 molecularly distinct groups, and Class 1 (V600) mutant tumors are treated with targeted therapies. Effective treatment has not been established for Class 2/3 or BRAF Fusions. We investigated whether BRAF mutation class differed according to clinical, genomic, and transcriptomic variables in cancer patients. MethodsUsing the AACR GENIE (v.12) cancer database, the distribution of BRAF mutation class in adult cancer patients was analyzed according to sex, age, primary race, and tumor type. Genomic alteration data and transcriptomic analysis was performed using The Cancer Genome Atlas. ResultsBRAF mutations were identified in 9515 (6.2%) samples among 153,834, with melanoma (31%), CRC (20.7%), and NSCLC (13.9%) being the most frequent cancer types. Class 1 harbored co-mutations outside of the MAPK pathway (TERT, RFN43) vs Class 2/3 mutations (RAS, NF1). Across all tumour types, Class 2/3 were enriched for alterations in genes involved in UV response and WNT/{beta}-catenin. Pathway analysis revealed enrichment of WNT/{beta}-catenin and Hedgehog signaling in non-V600 mutated CRC. Males had a higher proportion of Class 3 mutations vs. females (17.4% vs 12.3% q = 0.003). Non-V600 mutations were generally more common in older patients (aged 60+) vs younger (38% vs 15% p<0.0001), except in CRC (15% vs 30% q = 0.0001). Black race was associated with non-V600 BRAF alterations (OR: 1.58; p<0.0001). ConclusionsClass 2/3 BRAF are more present in Black, male patients with co-mutations outside of the MAPK pathway, likely requiring additional oncogenic input for tumorigenesis. Improving access to NGS and trial enrollment will help development of targeted therapies for non-V600 BRAF mutations. Statement of Translational RelevanceBRAF mutations are classified in 4 categories based on molecular characteristics, but only Class 1 BRAF V600 have effective targeted treatment strategies. With increasing access to next-generation sequencing, oncologists are more frequently uncovering non-V600 BRAF mutations, where there remains a scarcity of effective therapies. Responsiveness to MAPK pathway inhibitors differs according to BRAF mutation class and primary tumor type. For this reason, we sought to determine whether key demographic, genomic, and transcriptomic differences existed between classes. This cross-sectional study analyzes the largest dataset of BRAF-mutated cancers to date. Our findings propose insights to optimize clinical trial design and patient selection in the pursuit of developing effective treatment strategies for patients whose tumors harbor non-V600 BRAF mutations. This study also offers insights into the potential of targeting alternative pathways in addition to the MAPK pathway as part of combinatorial treatment strategies.

cancer biology↗

Clinical proteomics reveals vulnerabilities in non-invasive breast ductal carcinoma and drives personalized treatment strategies.

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the most common type (80%) of noninvasive breast lesions. The lack of validated prognostic markers, limited patient numbers and variable tissue quality significantly impact diagnosis, risk stratification, patient enrolment, and results of clinical studies. We performed label-free quantitative proteomics on 50 clinical formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded biopsies, validating 22 putative biomarkers from independent genetic studies. Our comprehensive proteomic phenotyping reveals more than 380 differentially expressed proteins and metabolic vulnerabilities, that can inform new therapeutic strategies for DCIS and IDC. Due to the readily druggable nature of proteins and metabolites, this study is of high interest for clinical research and pharmaceutical industry. To further evaluate our findings, and to promote the clinical translation of our study, we developed a highly multiplexed targeted proteomics assay for 90 proteins associated with cancer metabolism, RNA regulation and signature cancer pathways, such as Pi3K/AKT/mTOR and EGFR/RAS/RAF.

cancer biology↗

The genomic landscape of intrinsic and acquired resistance to cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in patients with hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer

Clinical resistance mechanisms to CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+ breast cancer have not been clearly defined. Whole exome sequencing of 59 tumors with CDK4/6i exposure revealed multiple candidate resistance mechanisms including RB1 loss, activating alterations in AKT1, RAS, AURKA, CCNE2, ERBB2, and FGFR2, and loss of ER expression. In vitro experiments confirmed that these alterations conferred CDK4/6i resistance. Cancer cells cultured to resistance with CDK4/6i also acquired RB1, KRAS, AURKA, or CCNE2 alterations, which conferred sensitivity to AURKA, ERK, or CHEK1 inhibition. Besides inactivation of RB1, which accounts for [~]5% of resistance, seven of these mechanisms have not been previously identified as clinical mediators of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients. Three of these--RAS activation, AKT activation, and AURKA activation--have not to our knowledge been previously demonstrated preclinically. Together, these eight mechanisms were present in 80% of resistant tumors profiled and may define therapeutic opportunities in patients. SignificanceWe identified eight distinct mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors present in 80% of resistant tumors profiled. Most of these have a therapeutic strategy to overcome or prevent resistance in these tumors. Taken together, these findings have critical implications related to the potential utility of precision-based approaches to overcome resistance in many patients with HR+ MBC.

cancer biology↗