Biology subjects

Basavanhalli, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Basavanhalli, S..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

BLAKOR inputs to the BNST regulate social stress-escalated alcohol consumption

BackgroundAversive social experiences can lead to escalated drug consumption and increase the risk of relapse to drug seeking. Individuals who consume alcohol to alleviate the effects of social stress are more likely to develop an alcohol use disorder (AUD). Repeated social defeat stress (SDS) enhances the rewarding and reinforcing effects of alcohol. However, the neural mechanisms that underlie social stress-escalated alcohol drinking are not well understood. Here we explored the role of the dynorphin/kappa opioid receptor (Dyn/KOR) system in regulating social stress-escalated alcohol consumption. MethodsMale and female mice were subjected to repeated SDS for 10 days following which they were left undisturbed in their home cages. They were then subject to intermittent access (IA) two-bottle choice alcohol consumption procedure. The effects of systemic and BNST-specific KOR antagonism using the selective KOR antagonist NorBNI on stress-escalated drinking were evaluated. Using chemogenetic approaches in Oprk1-Cre mice, we examined the role of KOR expressing cells in the basolateral amygdala (BLAKORs) and BLAKOR-BNST pathway in social stress-escalated alcohol consumption. ResultsRepeated SDS increased alcohol consumption and preference in both males and females. Systemic KOR antagonism attenuated SDS-escalated alcohol consumption in both males and females. BNST -specific KOR antagonism also attenuated stress-escalated drinking in males. Finally, selective chemogenetic activation of BLAKORs and BKAKOR-BNST pathway attenuated social stress-escalated alcohol consumption in both sexes. ConclusionOur results suggest a significant role for BLAKOR projections to the BNST in regulating social stress-escalated alcohol consumption. Our results provide further evidence that the Dyn/KOR system maybe a viable target for medications development to tareat comorbid stress and AUD.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Standard rodent diets differentially impact alcohol consumption and preference and gut microbiome diversity

Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) is a complex and widespread disease with limited pharmacotherapies. Preclinical animal models of AUD use a variety of voluntary alcohol consumption procedures to recapitulate different phases of AUD including binge alcohol consumption and dependence. However, voluntary alcohol consumption in mice is widely variable rendering it difficult to reproduce results across labs. Accumulating evidence indicates that different brands of commercially available rodent chow can profoundly influence alcohol intake. In this study, we investigated the effects of three commercially available and widely used rodent diet formulations on alcohol consumption and preference in C57BL/6J mice using the 24h intermittent access procedure. The three brands of chow tested were LabDiet 5001 (LD 5001), LabDiet 5053 (LD 5053), and Teklad 2019S (TL2019S) from two companies (Research Diets and Envigo respectively). Mice fed LD5001 displayed the highest levels of alcohol consumption and preference followed by LD5053 and TL2019S. We also found that alcohol consumption and preference could be rapidly switched by changing the diet 48h prior to alcohol administration. Sucrose, saccharin, and quinine preference were not altered suggesting that the diets did not alter taste perception. We also found that mice fed LD5001 displayed increased quinine-resistant alcohol intake compared to mice fed TL2019S, suggesting that diets could influence the development of "compulsive" like alcohol consumption. We profiled the gut microbiome of water and alcohol drinking mice that were maintained on different diets and found significant differences in bacterial alpha and beta diversity, which could impact gut-brain axis signaling and alcohol consumption.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

The role of genetically distinct central amygdala neurons in appetitive and aversive responding assayed with a novel dual valence operant conditioning paradigm.

To survive, animals must meet their biological needs while simultaneously avoiding danger. However, the neurobiological basis of appetitive and aversive survival behaviors has historically been studied using separate behavioral tasks. While recent studies in mice have quantified appetitive and aversive conditioned responses simultaneously (Heinz et al., 2017; Jikomes et al., 2016), these tasks required different behavioral responses to each stimulus. As many brain regions involved in survival behavior process stimuli of opposite valence, we developed a paradigm in which mice perform the same response (nosepoke) to distinct auditory cues to obtain a rewarding outcome (palatable food) or avoid an aversive outcome (mild footshoock). This design allows for both within- and between-subject comparisons as animals respond to appetitive and aversive cues. The central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) is implicated in the regulation of responses to stimuli of either valence. Considering its role in threat processing (Haubensak et al., 2010; Wilensky et al., 2006) and regulation of incentive salience (Warlow and Berridge, 2021), it is important to examine the contribution of the CeA to mechanisms potentially underlying comorbid dysregulation of avoidance and reward (Bolton et al., 2009; Sinha, 2008). Using this paradigm, we tested the role of two molecularly defined CeA subtypes previously linked to consummatory and defensive behaviors. Significant strain differences in the acquisition and performance of the task were observed. Bidirectional chemogenetic manipulation of CeA somatostatin (SOM) neurons altered motivation for reward and perseveration of reward-seeking responses on avoidance trials. Manipulation of corticotropin-releasing factor neurons (CRF) had no significant effect on food reward consumption, motivation, or task performance. This paradigm will facilitate investigations into the neuronal mechanisms controlling motivated behavior across valences. Significance StatementIt is unclear how different neuronal populations contribute to reward- and aversion-driven behaviors within a subject. To address this question, we developed a novel behavioral paradigm in which mice obtain food and avoid footshocks via the same operant response. We then use this paradigm to test how the central amygdala coordinates appetitive and aversive behavioral responses. By testing somatostatin-IRES-Cre and CRF-IRES-Cre transgenic lines, we found significant differences between strains on task acquisition and performance. Using chemogenetics, we demonstrate that CeA SOM+ neurons regulate motivation for reward, while manipulation of CeA CRF+ neurons had no effect on task performance. Future studies investigating the interaction between positive and negative motivation circuits should benefit from the use of this dual valence paradigm.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

Control of flight responses by a non-canonical corticolimbic pathway.

Survival requires the selection of appropriate behaviour in response to threats, and dysregulated defensive reactions are associated with psychiatric illnesses such as posttraumatic stress and panic disorder.1 Threat-induced behaviours, including freezing and flight, are controlled by neuronal circuits in the central amygdala (CeA)2; however, the source of neuronal excitation to the CeA that contributes to high-intensity defensive responses is unknown. Here we used a combination of neuroanatomical mapping, in-vivo calcium imaging, functional manipulations, and electrophysiology to characterize a previously unknown projection from the dorsal peduncular (DP) prefrontal cortex to the CeA. DP-to-CeA neurons are glutamatergic and specifically target the medial CeA, the main amygdalar output nucleus. Using a behavioural paradigm that elicits both freezing and flight, we found that CeA-projecting DP neurons are activated by high-intensity threats in a context-dependent manner. Functional manipulations revealed that the DP-to-CeA pathway is necessary and sufficient for both avoidance behaviour and flight. Furthermore, we found that DP projections target distinct medial CeA neuronal populations projecting to midbrain flight centres. These results elucidate a non-canonical top-down pathway regulating defensive responses.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Sex-dependent effects of traumatic stress on social behavior and neuronal activation in the prefrontal cortex and amygdala

Social behavior is complex and fundamental, and its deficits are common pathological features for several psychiatric disorders including anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Acute stress may have a negative impact on social behavior, and these effects can vary based on sex. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of two days of footshock stress on the sociability of male and female C57Bl/6J mice measured using a standard social interaction test. Animals were divided into two main groups of footshock exposure or context exposure control. Each group had mice that were treated with either the benzodiazepine alprazolam, or vehicle. In all groups, neuronal activation during social interaction was assessed using immunohistochemistry against the immediate early gene product cFos. Although footshock stress did not significantly alter sociability or latency to approach a social interaction counterpart, it did increase defensive tail-rattling behavior specifically in males. This stress-induced increase in tail-rattling was alleviated by alprazolam, yet alprazolam had no effect on female tail-rattling behavior in the stress group. Alprazolam lowered cFos expression in the medial prefrontal cortex, and social interaction induced sex-dependent differences in cFos activation in the ventromedial intercalated cell clusters. Overall, our results suggest that acute footshock stress induces sex-dependent alterations in defensiveness and patterns of cFos activation during social interaction tests.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Sex Differences in Behavioral Responses during a Conditioned Flight Paradigm

Females exhibit greater susceptibility to trauma- and stress-related disorders compared to males; therefore, it is imperative to study sex differences in the mode and magnitude of defensive responses in the face of threat. To test for sex differences in defensive behavior, we used a modified Pavlovian fear conditioning paradigm that elicits clear transitions between freezing and flight behaviors within individual subjects. Female mice subjected to this paradigm exhibited higher percentages of freezing behavior compared to males, especially during the intertrial interval period. Female mice also exhibited more cued freezing in response to the conditioned stimuli in the last block of extinction training. Furthermore, there were sex differences in the expression of other adaptive behaviors during fear conditioning. Assaying rearing, grooming, and tail rattling behaviors during the conditioned flight paradigm yielded measurable differences across sessions and between males and females. Overall, these results provide insight into sex-dependent alterations in mouse behavior induced by fear conditioning. HighlightsO_LIMale and female mice do not differ in conditioned flight behavior. C_LIO_LIFemale mice exhibit more freezing behavior. C_LIO_LIRearing, self-grooming, and tail rattling behavior changes across days. C_LIO_LIMale mice exhibit more rearing and grooming behavior. C_LIO_LIFemale mice exhibit more tail rattling behavior. C_LI

animal behavior and cognition↗