Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Barsoum, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Barsoum, N..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The cause-effect conundrum of local-scale site and soil factors in acute oak decline (AOD)

Background and aimsAcute oak decline (AOD), a decline syndrome affecting mature oaks, involves bacterial pathogens which likely act as opportunists under host stress. Trees displaying symptoms (bleeding cankers) appear in localized clusters, not whole stands. This study investigates the potential involvement of local-scale factors, in interaction with large-scale environmental drivers, in influencing onset and progression of AOD. MethodsAOD-symptomatic (n=30) and asymptomatic trees (n=30) across three UK oak woodlands were assessed for tree characteristics, their surrounding context, and soil properties. ResultsTree health status was linked to significant differences in soil and tree properties across sites. Symptomatic trees exhibited greater loss of crown density, lower local stand (0-20 m) basal area and shallower depth to gleying. Significant differences in soil properties included lower concentrations of Olsen P, total N, and exchangeable Mg in symptomatic trees, alongside higher exchangeable Fe, especially at 40-50 cm depth. Depth to gleying and exchangeable Fe were identified as the most influential predictors of AOD. ConclusionsAOD symptomatic trees may experience seasonal soil water saturation closer to the surface compared to asymptomatic trees, resulting in a higher proportion of their roots being exposed to an anoxic, iron-reducing environment. This study is the first to report such an association between gleying depth, likely seasonal water saturation, and symptom status for AOD. It is unclear whether water balance and associated soil nutrient variations are predisposing factors or consequences of declining tree health, though the identified local-scale factors likely contribute to AOD. A feedback loop is conceptualised where declining tree health worsens soil conditions, creating a negative cycle that accelerates tree decline.

ecology↗

Tree diversity reduces pathogen damage in temperate forests: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Diversifying planted forests to reduce the risks associated with large scale disturbances, such as pathogens, is a major aim of sustainable forest management. Previous meta-analyses have shown that insect pest damage is lower in mixed forest stands compared to monocultures, but the same has not been shown for pathogens. Here, we provide the first systematic review and meta-analysis specifically testing the effects of tree species diversity on pathogen damage. Relevant studies were retrieved using bibliographic databases and internet searches, as well as previously unpublished data sets contributed by stakeholders. We found that more diverse forest stands overall had significantly lower pathogen damage, and that this result was most pronounced in temperate forests for which the most studies were available. Although in some cases tree diversity had a strong effect, this was not universal and was influenced neither by pathogen specialism, nor by the presence of alternative hosts in stands. Instead, we found that tree neighbour identity rather than species richness emerged as a crucial variable impacting pathogen damage in mixed stands. Neighbour identity effects reported in studies were far-ranging, including impacts on the microclimate of stands. Future work should focus on mechanistic explanations that could underpin neighbour identity effects in mixed forests. We suggest the use of the disease triangle as a tool for considering the multiple factors that can influence pathogen damage in mixed forest stands.

ecology↗