Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Barradas-Bautista, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Barradas-Bautista, D..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Improving classification of correct and incorrect protein-protein docking models by augmenting the training set

Protein-protein interactions drive many relevant biological events, such as infection, replication, and recognition. To control or engineer such events, we need to access the molecular details of the interaction provided by experimental 3D structures. However, such experiments take time and are expensive; moreover, the current technology cannot keep up with the high discovery rate of new interactions. Computational modeling, like protein-protein docking, can help to fill this gap by generating docking poses. Protein-protein docking generally consists of two parts, sampling and scoring. The sampling is an exhaustive search of the tridimensional space. The caveat of the sampling produces a large number of incorrect poses, producing a highly unbalanced dataset. This limits the utility of the data to train machine learning classifiers. Using weak supervision, we developed a data augmentation method that we named hAIkal. Using hAIkal, we increased the labeled training data to train several algorithms. We trained and obtained different classifiers; the best classifier has 81% accuracy and 0.51 MCC on the test set, surpassing the state-of-the-art scoring functions.

bioinformatics↗

A Random Forest Classifier for Protein-Protein Docking Models

Herein, we present the results of a machine learning approach we developed to single out correct 3D docking models of protein-protein complexes obtained by popular docking software. To this aim, we generated a set of {approx}7x106 docking models with three different docking programs (HADDOCK, FTDock and ZDOCK) for the 230 complexes in the protein-protein interaction benchmark, version 5 (BM5). Three different machine-learning approaches (Random Forest, Supported Vector Machine and Perceptron) were used to train classifiers with 158 different scoring functions (features). The Random Forest algorithm outperformed the other two algorithms and was selected for further optimization. Using a features selection algorithm, and optimizing the random forest hyperparameters, allowed us to train and validate a random forest classifier, named CoDES (COnservation Driven Expert System). Testing of CoDES on independent datasets, as well as results of its comparative performance with machine-learning methods recently developed in the field for the scoring of docking decoys, confirm its state-of-the-art ability to discriminate correct from incorrect decoys both in terms of global parameters and in terms of decoys ranked at the top positions.

bioinformatics↗