Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Barnes-Scheufler, C. V.

Publications and source records attributed to Barnes-Scheufler, C. V..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Impaired Visuospatial Working Memory but Preserved Attentional Control in Bipolar Disorder

BACKGROUNDPersistent deficits in working memory (WM) and attention have considerable clinical and functional impact in people with bipolar disorder (PBD). Understanding the neurocognitive underpinnings of these interacting cognitive constructs might facilitate the discovery of more effective pro-cognitive interventions. Therefore, we employed a paradigm designed for jointly studying attentional control and WM encoding. METHODSWe used a visuospatial change-detection task using four Gabor Patches with differing orientations in 63 euthymic PBD and 76 healthy controls (HCS), which investigated attentional competition during WM encoding. To manipulate bottom-up attention using stimulus salience, two Gabor patches flickered, which were designated as either targets or distractors. To manipulate top-down attention, the Gabor patches were preceded by either a predictive or a non-predictive cue for the target locations. RESULTSAcross all task conditions, PBD stored significantly less information in visual WM than HCS (significant effect of group). However, we observed no significant group by salience or group by cue interactions. This indicates that impaired WM was not caused by deficits in attentional control. CONCLUSIONSOur results imply that while WM is disturbed in PBD, attentional prioritization of salient targets and distractors as well as the utilization of external top-down cues were not compromised. Consequently, the control of attentional selection appears be intact. These findings provide important constraints for models of WM dysfunction in PBD by indicating that later stages of WM encoding are likely primarily impaired. We also demonstrate that selective attention is not among the main sources of cognitive impairment in PBD.

neuroscience↗

Improved correspondence of fMRI visual field localizer data after macroanatomical alignment

Studying the visual system with fMRI often requires using localizer paradigms to define regions of interest (ROIs). However, the considerable interindividual variability of the cerebral cortex represents a crucial confound for group-level analyses. Cortex-based alignment (CBA) techniques reliably reduce interindividual macroanatomical variability. Yet, their utility has not been assessed for visual field localizer paradigms, which map specific parts of the visual field within retinotopically organized visual areas. We evaluated CBA for an attention-enhanced visual field localizer mapping homologous parts of each visual quadrant in 50 participants. We compared CBA with volume-based alignment and a surface-based analysis, which did not include macroanatomical alignment. CBA led to the strongest increase in the probability of activation overlap (up to 40 percent). On the group level, CBA led to the most consistent increase in ROI size while preserving vertical ROI symmetry. Overall, our results indicate, that in addition to the increased signal-to-noise ratio of a surface-based analysis macroanatomical alignment considerably improves statistical power. These findings confirm and extend the utility of CBA for the study of the visual system in the context of group analyses. CBA should be particularly relevant when studying neuropsychiatric disorders with abnormally increased interindividual macroanatomical variability.

neuroscience↗