Barina, Z. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2024

Integrating target capture with whole genome sequencing of recent and natural history collections to explain the phylogeography of wild-growing and cultivated Cannabis

O_LICannabis has provided important and versatile services to humans for millennia. Domestication and subsequent dispersal have resulted in various landraces and cultivars. Unravelling the phylogeography of this genus poses considerable challenges due to its complex history. C_LIO_LIWe relied on a Hyb-Seq approach (combining target capture with shotgun sequencing), with the universal Angiosperms353 enrichment panel, to explore the genetic structure of wild-growing accessions and cultivars by implementing phylogenomic and population genomic workflows on the same Hyb-Seq data. C_LIO_LIOur findings support the treatment of Cannabis as a monotypic genus (C. sativa L.), structured into three main genetic groups--E Asia, Paleotropis, and Boreal--with clear phylogeographic signal despite significant levels of admixture. The E Asia group was sister to the Paleotropis and the Boreal groups. Individuals within the Paleotropis group could be further structured into three subgroups: Iranian Plateau, C & S China and Himalayas, and Indoafrica. Individuals from the Boreal group split into two subgroups: Eurosiberia and W Mongolia and Caucasus and Mediterranean. Hemp and drug-type landraces and cultivars consistently matched their putative geographic origin. C_LIO_LIThese findings enhance our understanding of the genetic patterns in Cannabis and provide a framework for future research into its current and past genetic diversity. C_LI

genomics↗

bioRxiv2021

The colonial legacy of herbaria

Herbarium collections shape our understanding of the worlds flora and are crucial for addressing global change and biodiversity conservation. The formation of such natural history collections, however, are not free from sociopolitical issues of immediate relevance. Despite increasing efforts addressing issues of representation and colonialism in natural history collections, herbaria have received comparatively less attention. While it has been noted that the majority of plant specimens are housed in the global North, the extent of this disparity has not been rigorously quantified to date. Here, by analyzing over 85 million specimen records and surveying herbaria across the globe, we assess the colonial legacy of botanical collections and how we may move towards a more inclusive future. We demonstrate that colonial exploitation has contributed to an inverse relationship between where plant biodiversity exists in nature and where it is housed in herbaria. Such disparities persist in herbaria across physical and digital realms despite overt colonialism having ended over half a century ago, suggesting ongoing digitization and decolonization efforts have yet to alleviate colonial-era discrepancies. We emphasize the need for acknowledging the inconvenient history of herbarium collections and the implementation of a more equitable, global paradigm for their collection, curation, and use.

ecology↗