Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Barbaro, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Barbaro, L..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Urban tree diversity fosters bird insectivory despite a loss in bird diversity with urbanization

Urbanization is one of the main drivers of biotic homogenization in bird communities worldwide. Yet, only a few studies have addressed its functional consequences on the top-down control birds exert on insect herbivores. We hypothesized that their inconsistent results reflect the overlooked heterogeneity of the urban habitat for birds, and in particular the distribution and diversity of urban trees. We monitored tree diversity, bird diversity, avian predation attempts on artificial prey, and the effect of bird exclusion on insect herbivory in 97 trees distributed among 24 urban experimental plots in the city of Montreal, Canada. We characterized urbanization levels through a combination of variables related to tree density, impervious surfaces, anthropic noise, and human population density. Bird diversity decreased with increasing urbanization, whereas the frequency of generalist synurbic species increased. We found no significant relationship between predation and urbanization or between predation and bird diversity. However, tree diversity was positively correlated with predation attempts on artificial prey, irrespective of bird diversity. We revealed a mismatch between the effects of urbanization on bird diversity and on the regulation service and unraveled the functional importance of tree diversity in shaping the avian predation function in urban ecosystems. Our study advocates for the consideration of intra-urban heterogeneity in the investigation of trophic cascades within cities.

ecology↗

Worldwide soundscape ecology patterns across realms

Abstract and keywordsO_ST_ABSAimC_ST_ABSThe urgency for remote, reliable, and scalable biodiversity monitoring amidst mounting human pressures on ecosystems has sparked worldwide interest in Passive Acoustic Monitoring (PAM), which can track life underwater and on land. However, we lack a unified methodology to report this sampling effort and a comprehensive overview of PAM coverage to gauge its potential as a global research and monitoring tool. To remediate this, we created the Worldwide Soundscapes project, a collaborative network and growing database comprising metadata from 409 datasets across all realms (terrestrial, marine, freshwater, and subterranean). LocationWorldwide, 12 200 sites, all ecosystems. Time period1991 to present. Major taxa studiedAll soniferous taxa. MethodsWe synthesise sampling coverage across spatial, temporal, and ecological scales using metadata describing sampling locations, deployment schedules, focal taxa, and recording parameters. We explore global trends in biological, anthropogenic, and geophysical sounds based on 168 recordings from twelve ecosystems across all realms. ResultsTerrestrial sampling is spatially denser (45 sites/Mkm2) than aquatic sampling (0.3 and 1.8 sites/Mkm2 in oceans and fresh water) with only two subterranean datasets. Although diel and lunar cycles are well-covered in all realms, only marine datasets (56%) comprehensively sample all seasons. Across twelve ecosystems, biological sounds show contrasting diel patterns, decline with distance from the equator and negatively correlate with anthropogenic sounds. Main conclusionsPAM can inform macroecology studies as well as global conservation and phenology syntheses, but representation can be improved by expanding terrestrial taxonomic scope, sampling coverage in the high seas and subterranean ecosystems, and spatio-temporal replication in freshwater habitats. Overall, this global PAM network holds promise to support global biodiversity research and monitoring efforts.

ecology↗

Assessing the potential of BirdNET to infer European bird communities from large-scale ecoacoustic data

O_LIPassive acoustic monitoring has become increasingly popular as a practical and cost-effective way of obtaining highly reliable acoustic data in ecological research projects. Increased ease of collecting these data means that, currently, the main bottleneck in ecoacoustic monitoring projects is often the time required for the manual analysis of passively collected recordings. In this study we evaluate the potential and current limitations of BirdNET-Analyzer v2.4, the most advanced and generic deep learning algorithm for bird recognition to date, as a tool to assess bird community composition through the automated analysis of large-scale ecoacoustic data. C_LIO_LITo this end, we study 3 acoustic datasets comprising a total of 629 environmental soundscapes collected in 194 different sites spread across a 19{degrees} latitude span in Europe. We analyze these recordings both with BirdNET and by manual listening by local expert birders, and we then compare the results obtained through the two methods to evaluate the performance of the algorithm both at the level of each single vocalization and for entire recording sequences (1, 5 or 10 min). C_LIO_LIOur analyses reveal that BirdNET identifications can be highly reliable if a sufficiently high minimum confidence threshold is used. However, the current recall of the algorithm is markedly low when the minimum confidence threshold is adjusted to ensure high levels of precision. Thus, we found that F1-scores remain moderate (<0.5) for all datasets and confidence thresholds studied. We therefore estimate that acoustic datasets of extended duration are currently necessary for BirdNET to provide a reliable and minimally comprehensive picture of the target bird community. Our results also suggest that BirdNET performance is not significantly influenced by the type of recorder used or the habitat recorded but is modulated by the volume of species-specific acoustic data available online. C_LIO_LIWe conclude that a judicious use of AI-based IDs provided by BirdNET can represent a novel and powerful method to assist in the assessment of bird community composition through the automated analysis of large-scale ecoacoustic data. Finally, we provide best use recommendations to ensure optimal results from the algorithm for the ecological study of bird communities. C_LI

ecology↗

Following the track: accuracy and reproducibility of predation assessment on artificial caterpillars

Experimental studies of biotic interactions in real field conditions are essential to understand the structure and functioning of ecological networks. The use of artificial caterpillars to mimic actual prey availability is generally seen as a standard approach to compare the activity and diversity of predators along environmental gradients. Yet, even with standardized material and procedures, biases may still affect data from multiple observers with different expertise. We used pictures of artificial caterpillars with or without various predation marks, in an online survey that was targeted for the participants of the project, to evaluate the reliability of predation marks identification made by non-scientists and by scientists with and without previous experience in predation mark identification. Pictures of artificial caterpillars displayed typical marks left by birds, mammals and arthropods, as well as non-predation marks ( false positive). 357 respondents scanned 7140 pictures of these pictures. Self-declared scientists were more confident and accurate in their observations than non-scientists, but the differences in correct identifications among scientists and non-scientists were low. Self-declared scientists with previous experience were also more accurate than scientists without previous experience, while there were no differences in self-confidence among scientists with and without previous experience. Accuracy in predation mark identification did not differ among types of predators, but respondents were more keen to identify marks left by birds or mammals than arthropods. Our results have practical implications for the design of multi-observer projects relying on artificial caterpillars as a proxy to assess predation intensity, in particular in the context of citizen science.

ecology↗

Search for top-down and bottom-up drivers of latitudinal trends in insect herbivory in oak trees in Europe

AimThe strength of species interactions is traditionally expected to become stronger toward the Equator. However, recent studies have reported opposite or inconsistent latitudinal trends in the bottom-up (plant quality) and top-down (natural enemies) forces driving insect herbivory, possibly because these forces have rarely been studied concomitantly. This makes previous attempts to understand the effect of large scale climatic gradients on insect herbivory unsuccessful. LocationEurope Time period2018-2019 Major taxa studiedQuercus robur MethodsWe used scholar-based citizen science to simultaneously test for latitudinal variation in plant-herbivore-natural enemy interactions. We further investigated the underlying climatic factors associated with variation in herbivory, leaf chemistry and attack rates in Quercus robur across its complete latitudinal range in Europe. We quantified insect herbivory and the occurrence of specialist herbivores as well as leaf chemistry and bird attack rates on dummy caterpillars on 261 oak trees. ResultsClimatic factors rather than latitude per se were the best predictors of the large-scale (geographical) variation in the incidence of gall-inducers and leaf-miners as well as of leaf nutritional quality. However, insect herbivory, plant chemical defences (leaf phenolics) and bird attack rates were not influenced by latitude or climatic factors. The incidence of leaf-miners increased with increasing concentrations of hydrolysable tannins and decreased with those of condensed tannins, whereas the incidence of gall-inducers increased with increasing leaf soluble sugar concentration and decreased with increasing leaf C:N ratios. However, neither other traits nor bird attack rates varied with insect herbivory. Main conclusionsThese findings help to refine our understanding of the bottom-up and top-down mechanisms driving geographical variation in plant-herbivore interactions, and urge for further examination of the drivers of insect herbivory on trees.

ecology↗

Can school children support ecological research? Lessons from the ‘Oak bodyguard’ citizen science project

Scientific knowledge in the field of ecology is increasingly enriched by data acquired by the general public participating in citizen science (CS) programs. Yet, doubts remain about the reliability of such data, in particular when acquired by school children. We built upon an ongoing CS program - Oak bodyguards - to assess the ability of European schoolchildren to accurately estimate the strength of biotic interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. We used standardized protocols to estimate predation rates on artificial caterpillars and insect herbivory on oak leaves and compared estimates made by school children, trained and untrained professional scientists (with no or limited expertise in predation or herbivory assessment). Compared to trained scientists, both schoolchildren and untrained professional scientists overestimated predation rates, but assessments made by the latter were more consistent. School children overestimated insect herbivory, as did untrained professional scientists. Thus, raw data acquired by school children participating in CS programs cannot be used and require several quality checks. However, such data are of no less value than data collected by untrained professional scientists and can be calibrated for bias.

scientific communication and education↗

Insect herbivory and avian insectivory in novel native oak forests: divergent effects of stand size and connectivity

The value of novel native broadleaf woodlands for biodiversity conservation is important to consider for adequate forest management in rural landscapes. Passive reforestation has been proposed as a cost-efficient tool for creating networks of novel native forest stands that would help restoring biodiversity and associated ecosystem services. Yet to date the ecological functioning of such stands remains strongly understudied compared to forest remnants resulting from longer-term fragmentation. We assessed how the size and connectivity of newly established Pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) stands in rural landscapes of SW France affect rates of herbivory by different insect guilds as well as rates of avian insectivory and the abundance and richness of insectivorous birds. Comparing 18 novel forest stands along a gradient of size (0.04-1.15 ha) and cover of broadleaf forests in the surroundings (0-30% within a 500 radius), we found that even the smallest stands are colonised by leaf miners and chewers/skeletonizers, and that rates of herbivory are globally comparable to those reported from older and larger oak forests. The size of stands had a relatively minor effect on herbivory, whereas it increased the abundance of insectivorous bird. It also determined rates of avian insectivory as estimated by an experiment with plasticine caterpillars. These rates were however rather low and unrelated with the extent of herbivory in the stand. Overall, our study indicates that insect herbivores tend to react more rapidly to the establishment of novel native forests than their avian predators as the latter may depend on the development of larger patches of suitable habitat in the surrounding landscape. To favour a rapid build-up of diverse, and hence stable, trophic networks involving insect herbivores and their predators, woodland creation schemes should therefore primarily focus on habitat size and quality.

ecology↗