Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Barandon, P.

Publications and source records attributed to Barandon, P..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Incentive valence differentially engages open- and closed-loop basal ganglia circuits during movement initiation

Incentives modulate voluntary movement, yet the circuitry channeling these signals into motor output remains unclear. Classical models emphasize a closed-loop circuit (CLC) linking dorsal putamen (PUTd) with motor cortex, but this pathway is anatomically segregated from affective processing regions. Anatomical and clinical evidence point to an alternative: an open-loop circuit (OLC) from ventral putamen (PUTv) that may route affective signals to motor cortex. Here, we conducted two experiments to test whether a functional OLC exists in humans and whether it is differentially engaged by incentive conditions. First, in 7 T resting-state fMRI (multi-echo), PUTv showed robust functional connectivity with both affective and motor regions, including the cingulate motor area (CMA), even after accounting for PUTd variance. This connectivity pattern supports the plausibility of an independent pathway linking affective basal ganglia regions to the motor cortex. Second, in 3 T task fMRI (incentivized reaching), jackpot (high-reward) and robber (high-loss avoidance) incentive conditions produced distinct behavioral and neural signatures. Jackpot produced a speed-accuracy trade-off, with faster movement initiation but more false starts. Neurally, this coincided with engagement (BOLD responses relevant for initiation speed) being reduced in CLC nodes but not in OLC. Robber, in contrast, eliminated engagement in both OLC and CLC nodes, instead recruiting stopping-related regions (e.g., STN), consistent with an avoidance phenomenology. Together, these findings support a versatile architecture for movement initiation that flexibly engages distinct cortico-subcortical circuits depending on incentive phenomenology, and offer a candidate mechanism through which affective salience and valence modulate voluntary movement. Significance StatementAffective signals profoundly influence movement, yet the mechanisms linking motivationally relevant contexts with motor behavior remain unclear. Combining ultra-high field (7 T) connectomics with task-based (3 T) neuroimaging, we provide the first systems-level evidence in humans for such a mechanism: a ventral putamen-centered open-loop circuit (OLC) connecting affective and motor areas, operating alongside the canonical dorsal putamen-centered closed-loop sensorimotor circuit (CLC). Critically, the phenomenological quality of incentive (how it is construed as reward versus threat) rather than magnitude alone, likely determines which circuit dominates during movement initiation. These findings help to explain paradoxical kinesia in Parkinsons disease, where affective contexts can bypass degraded sensorimotor circuits, and establish foundations for context-based therapeutic interventions.

neuroscience↗

Dissociation of novel open loop from ventral putamen to motor areas from classic closed loop in humans II: task-based function

Humans ubiquitously increase the speed of their movements when motivated by incentives (i.e., capturing reward or avoiding loss). The complex interplay between incentivization and motor output is pertinent for unpacking the functional profiles of different circuits that link the basal ganglia with motor cortical areas. Here, we analyzed the functional profile of nodes forming two circuits involving putamen and motor cortical areas: the traditional "closed-loop circuit" (CLC) from sensorimotor dorsal putamen (PUTd) and a putative "open-loop circuit" (OLC) from ventral putamen (PUTv). Establishing differential function between CLC and OLC is particularly relevant for therapeutic approaches to Parkinsons disease, where OLC function is hypothesized to be relatively spared by the disease process. In a large sample fMRI study, 68 healthy controls executed speeded reaches with a joystick under different levels of incentivization to accurately hit precision targets. We dissociated effects of "incentive per se" (i.e., changes in brain activity when an upcoming movement obtains a reward or avoids a loss) from "RT effects" (i.e., brain activity that directly scales with adjustments to movement initiation time). Incentive per se was observed across sites in both CLC and OLC. However, RT effects were primarily in nodes of the OLC and motor sites, consistent with the hypothesized anatomy and function of OLC. Our findings additionally suggest valence might mediate when incentives recruit OLC to more prominent control of motor behavior.

neuroscience↗