Biology subjects

Banks, M. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Banks, M. L..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2025

Effects of the muscarinic M1 agonist VU0364572 and the M1/M4-prefering agonist xanomeline on cocaine choice in male and female rats

Cocaine use disorder (CUD) is a continuing threat to public health that lacks a Food and Drug Administration approved pharmacotherapy. However, there is evidence to suggest that muscarinic receptor activation may lead to reductions in cocaine taking, acquisition, and choice. Therefore, we use a cocaine-vs-food choice procedure in male and female Sprague-Dawley rats to evaluate the effectiveness of the bitopic M1/M4 preferring muscarinic agonist xanomeline and the M1 muscarinic agonist/positive allosteric modulator VU0364572 (VU72). We found that repeated xanomeline did significantly attenuate cocaine choice while VU72 failed to meaningfully alter cocaine choice across subjects. These results suggest that the mechanism by which muscarinic receptors modulate cocaine reinforcement may be mediated either by M4 muscarinic receptors specifically or a combination of both M1 and M4 muscarinic receptors acting in concert. Furthermore, there is evidence that xanomeline may prove a viable pharmacotherapy for treating CUD.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

bioRxiv2023

A concurrently available negative reinforcer robustly decreases cocaine self-administration in male and female rats

Continued drug-taking despite adverse consequences is hypothesized to be an insidious behavioral hallmark of drug addiction. Although most preclinical research has focused on drug self-administration in the presence of positive punishment, another source of potential adverse consequences is behavioral allocation away from negative reinforcers (i.e., escape/avoid electric shock) and towards drug reinforcers. The goals of the present study were to establish a discrete-trial cocaine-vs-negative reinforcer choice procedure in male and female rats and determine sensitivity of choice behavior to environmental and pharmacological manipulations. Rats could make up to nine discrete choices between an intravenous cocaine infusion (0.32 - 1.8 mg/kg/inf) under a fixed-ratio (FR) 3 schedule and a negative reinforcer (escape or avoidance of electric shock, 0.1 - 0.7 mA) under an FR1 schedule. The negative reinforcer was consistently chosen over all cocaine doses. Lowering shock magnitude decreased negative reinforcer trials, increased omitted trials, and failed to promote behavioral reallocation towards cocaine. Increasing the negative reinforcement response requirement between sessions only increased omitted trials. Introduction of 12-hr extended access cocaine self-administration sessions across two weeks resulted in high daily cocaine intakes but failed to significantly increase cocaine choice. Acute diazepam pretreatment also did not impact choice behavior up to doses that produced behavioral depression. Overall, the lack of behavioral allocation between cocaine infusions and a negative reinforcer suggests these two reinforcers may be economic independents. Additionally, the failure of extended cocaine access to increase cocaine choice highlights the importance of alternative reinforcers and environmental context in preclinical models of drug addiction.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

Effects of environmental manipulations on cocaine-vs-social choice in male and female rats

Cocaine use disorder occurs in an environment where cocaine and other nondrug commodities are concurrently available. Preclinical drug-vs-nondrug choice procedures are one simplified method of modeling this complex clinical environment. The present study established a discrete-trial progressive-ratio (PR) cocaine-vs-social interaction choice procedure in male and female rats and determined sensitivity of choice behavior to manipulations of reinforcer magnitude and non-contingent "sample" reinforcer presentation. Rats could make up to nine discrete choices between an intravenous cocaine infusion (0.1 - 1.0 mg/kg/inf) and social interaction with a same-sex social "Partner" rat. Cocaine infusions were available under a PR schedule of reinforcement, and social interaction was available under a fixed-ratio (FR) 3 schedule. Social interaction was chosen over no or small cocaine doses (saline, 0.01 mg/kg/inf) and behavior was reallocated away from social and towards cocaine at larger cocaine doses (1.0 mg/kg/inf). Manipulating social interaction time as one method to alter social reinforcer magnitude did not significantly alter cocaine-vs-social choice. Removing the non-contingent reinforcer presentations before the discrete choice trials also failed to affect cocaine-vs-social choice, suggesting the time interval was sufficient to minimize any potential influence of the non-contingent cocaine infusions on subsequent choice behavior. Overall, the present results were consistent with previous drug-vs-social choice studies and extend our knowledge of environmental factors impacting drug-vs-social choice. Future studies determining the pharmacological sensitivity of cocaine-vs-social choice will be important in expanding the preclinical utility of these procedures for candidate medication drug development.

pharmacology and toxicology↗

bioRxiv2021

Opioid withdrawal produces sex-specific effects on fentanyl-vs.-food choice and mesolimbic transcription

BackgroundOpioid withdrawal is a key driver of opioid addiction and an obstacle to recovery. However, withdrawal effects on opioid reinforcement and mesolimbic neuroadaptation are understudied and the role of sex is largely unknown. MethodsMale (n=10) and female (n=9) rats responded under a fentanyl-vs.-food "choice" procedure during daily 2h sessions. In addition to the daily choice sessions, rats were provided extended access to fentanyl during 12h sessions. After two weeks of this self-administration regimen, the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and ventral tegmental area (VTA) of a subset of rats were subjected to RNA sequencing. In the remaining rats, a third week of this self-administration regimen was conducted, during which methadone effects on fentanyl-vs.-food choice were determined. ResultsPrior to opioid dependence, male and female rats similarly allocated responding between fentanyl and food. Abstinence from extended fentanyl access elicited a similar increase in somatic withdrawal signs in both sexes. Despite similar withdrawal signs and extended access fentanyl intake, opioid withdrawal was accompanied by a maladaptive increase in fentanyl choice in males, but not females. Behavioral sex differences corresponded with transcriptional hyperfunction in the NAc and VTA of opioid-withdrawn females relative to males. Methadone blocked withdrawal-associated increases in fentanyl choice in males, but failed to further decrease fentanyl choice in females. ConclusionsThese results provide foundational evidence of sex-specific neuroadaptations to opioid withdrawal, which may be relevant to the female-specific resilience to withdrawal-associated increases in opioid choice and aid in the identification of novel therapeutic targets.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Effectiveness and selectivity of a heroin conjugate vaccine to attenuate heroin, 6-acetylmorphine, and morphine antinociception in rats: Comparison with naltrexone

BackgroundOne emerging strategy to address the opioid crisis includes opioid-targeted immunopharmacotherapies. This study compared effectiveness of a heroin-tetanus toxoid (TT) conjugate vaccine to antagonize heroin, 6-acetylmorphine (6-AM), morphine, and fentanyl antinociception in rats.\n\nMethodsAdult male and female Sprague Dawley rats received three doses of active or control vaccine at weeks 0, 2, and 4. Vaccine pharmacological selectivity was assessed by comparing opioid dose-effect curves in 50{degrees}C warm-water tail-withdrawal procedure before and after active or control heroin-TT vaccine. Route of administration [subcutaneous (SC) vs. intravenous [IV)] was also examined as a determinant of vaccine effectiveness. Continuous naltrexone treatment (0.0032-0.032 mg/kg/h) effects on heroin, 6-AM, and morphine antinociceptive potency was also determined as a benchmark for minimal vaccine effectiveness.\n\nResultsThe heroin-TT vaccine decreased potency of SC heroin (5-fold), IV heroin (3-fold), and IV 6-AM (3-fold) for several weeks without affecting IV morphine or SC and IV fentanyl potency. The control vaccine did not alter potency of any opioid. Naltrexone dose-dependently decreased antinociceptive potency of SC heroin, and treatment with 0.01 mg/kg/h naltrexone produced similar, approximate 8-fold decreases in potencies of SC and IV heroin, IV 6-AM, and IV morphine. The combination of naltrexone and active vaccine was more effective than naltrexone alone to antagonize SC heroin but not IV heroin.\n\nConclusionsThe heroin-TT vaccine formulation examined is less effective, but more selective, than chronic naltrexone to attenuate heroin antinociception in rats. Furthermore, these results provide an empirical framework for future preclinical opioid vaccine research to benchmark effectiveness against naltrexone.

pharmacology and toxicology↗