Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Bandell, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Bandell, J..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Positive germline selection of mtDNA mutations: evidence from the oocyte.

Purifying selection is the removal of detrimental mutations. Nuclear DNA mutations are purged by removing mutant individuals, embryos, or germline cells. Because mtDNA is present in numerous copies per cell, purifying selection of mtDNA mutations introduces an additional layer of complexity. The intracellular mutant fraction can change due to clonal expansion/reduction of mutant mtDNA molecules in germline cells. Different research groups have reported either negative (purifying), or positive (destructive) germline mtDNA selection. In this study, we use recently published high-fidelity data on mtDNA mutations in individual human oocytes from the Makova laboratory (Arbeithuber et al., 2025) to resolve this disagreement. To assess selection, we used the "selective expansion" metric St, which compares the average weighted rate of clonal expansion in a set of mutations tested for selection (e.g. non-synonymous mutations) to that of the set of synonymous mutations. We found that, on average, noncoding oocyte mutations in the control region expand faster than synonymous mutations, i.e., are under positive selection. Intriguingly, mutations in the coding region, the detrimental ones in particular, were also on average under positive selection. The prescence of average positive selection does not preclude purifying selection against individual mutations; it only indicates that positive selection dominates in aggregate mutational dynamics. Positive selection impacts the dynamics of de novo germline mutations that arise in primordial germ cells or oocytes and have not yet been inherited by the next generation. Contrastly, mutations that are passed to subsequent generations are under average purifying selection. We suggest that initial positive selection begets subsequent purifying selection by increasing intracellular mutant fractions to levels at which their deleterious effects become phenotypically apparent and can be efficiently removed.

genetics↗

Are mitochondrial DNA mutations under purifying selection in somatic tissues?

The extent to which somatic mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations are subject to selection is a fundamental question relevant to development, mitochondrial disease, cancer, and aging. Recently a study from the Sudmant laboratory that used an advanced, high fidelity mutational analysis reported that somatic mutations in protein-coding genes exhibit signatures of negative selection. This report came as surprise as several other studies including those that used same technology reported either lack of selection or positive (destructive) selection on somatic mutations. We hypothesized that these discrepancies may stem, in part, from the inclusion of germline mutations in addition to somatic ones, which could bias selection analyses due to the high synonymity of the latter. To test this, we reanalyzed the Sudmant dataset by separating mutations into germline (defined as shared between related animals) and somatic (not shared between tissues of an animal). We then employed a cumulative curve approach to assess selection without bias. Our analysis reveals that, indeed, an apparent purifying selection signal is driven by an admixture of synonymous germline mutations and disappears upon their removal. The remaining somatic mutations for most part show overall dynamics consistent with neutral drift. However, mutations at higher mutant fractions show positive selection trend, most compatible with a low proportion of mutations experiencing positive selection. While we do not exclude rare or context-specific selection events, our results argue against pervasive somatic selection and highlight the importance of rigorous stratification when interpreting mtDNA mutational patterns.

genetics↗