Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Baltaretu, B. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Baltaretu, B. R..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Saccades Influence Functional Modularity in the Human Cortical Vision Network

Visual cortex is thought to show both dorsoventral and hemispheric modularity, but it is not known if the same functional modules emerge spontaneously from an unsupervised network analysis, or how they interact when saccades necessitate increased sharing of spatial information. Here, we address these issues by applying graph theory analysis to fMRI data obtained while human participants decided whether an objects shape or orientation changed, with or without an intervening saccade across the object. BOLD activation from 50 vision-related cortical nodes was used to identify local and global network properties. Modularity analysis revealed three sub-networks during fixation: a bilateral parietofrontal network linking areas implicated in visuospatial processing and two lateralized occipitotemporal networks linking areas implicated in object feature processing. When horizontal saccades required visual comparisons between visual hemifields, functional interconnectivity and information transfer increased, and the two lateralized ventral modules became functionally integrated into a single bilateral sub-network. This network included between module connectivity hubs in lateral intraparietal cortex and dorsomedial occipital areas previously implicated in transsaccadic integration. These results provide support for functional modularity in the visual system and show that the hemispheric sub-networks are modified and functionally integrated during saccades.

neuroscience↗

Medial occipital cortex participates in a cortical network for transsaccadic feature discrimination: an fMRI paradigm

Saccades change eye position and interrupt vision several times per second, necessitating neural mechanisms for continuous perception of object identity, orientation, and location. Neuroimaging studies suggest that occipital and parietal cortex play complementary roles for transsaccadic perception of intrinsic versus extrinsic spatial properties, e.g., dorsomedial occipital cortex (cuneus) is sensitive to changes in spatial frequency, whereas the supramarginal gyrus (SMG) is modulated by changes in object orientation. Based on this, we hypothesized that both structures would be recruited to simultaneously monitor identity and orientation across saccades. To test this, we merged two previous neuroimaging protocols: 21 participants viewed a 2D object and then, after sustained fixation or a saccade, judged whether the shape or orientation of the represented object changed. We, then, performed a bilateral region-of-interest analysis on identified cuneus and SMG sites. As hypothesized, cuneus showed both saccade and feature (i.e., orientation vs. shape change) modulations, and right SMG showed saccade-feature interactions. Further, the cuneus activity time course correlated with several other cortical saccade / visual areas, suggesting a functional network for feature discrimination. These results confirm the involvement of occipital / parietal cortex in transsaccadic vision and support complementary roles in spatial versus identity updating.

neuroscience↗

Parietal Mechanisms for Transsaccadic Spatial Frequency Perception: An fMRI Study

Posterior parietal cortex (PPC), specifically right supramarginal gyrus, is involved in transsaccadic memory of object orientation for both perception and action. Here, we investigated whether PPC is involved in transsaccadic memory of other features, namely spatial frequency. We employed a functional magnetic resonance imaging paradigm where participants briefly viewed a grating stimulus with a specific spatial frequency that later reappeared with the same or different frequency, after a saccade or continuous fixation. Post-saccadic frequency modulation activated a region in the right hemisphere spanning medial PPC (ventral precuneus) and posterior cingulate cortex. Importantly, the site of peak precuneus activation showed saccade-specific feature modulation (compared to fixation) and task-specific saccade modulation (compared to a saccade localizer task). Psychophysiological interaction analysis revealed functional connectivity between this precuneus site and the precentral gyrus (M1), lingual gyrus (V1/V2), and medial occipitotemporal sulcus. This differed from the transsaccadic orientation network, perhaps because spatial frequency signaled changes in object identity. Overall, this experiment supports a general role for PPC in transsaccadic vision, but suggests that different networks are employed for specific features.

neuroscience↗

Parietal Cortex Integrates Visual and Oculomotor Signals to Update Grasp Plans

Coordinated reach-to-grasp movements are often accompanied by rapid eye movements (saccades) that displace the desired object image relative to the retina. Parietal cortex compensates for this by updating reach goals relative to current gaze direction, but its role in the integration of oculomotor and visual orientation signals for updating grasp plans is unknown. Based on a recent perceptual experiment, we hypothesized that inferior parietal cortex (specifically supramarginal gyrus; SMG) integrates saccade and visual signals to update grasp plans in more superior parietal areas. To test this hypothesis, we employed a functional magnetic resonance adaptation paradigm, where saccades sometimes interrupted grasp preparation toward a briefly presented object that later reappeared (with the same/different orientation) just before movement. Right SMG and several parietal grasp areas, namely left anterior intraparietal sulcus (aIPS) and bilateral superior parietal lobe (SPL), met our criteria for transsaccadic orientation integration: during movement preparation, they showed task-dependent saccade modulations and, during grasp execution, they were specifically sensitive to changes in object orientation that followed saccades. Finally, SMG showed enhanced functional connectivity with both prefrontal saccade areas (consistent with oculomotor input) and aIPS / SPL (consistent with sensorimotor output). These results support the general role of parietal cortex for the integration of visuospatial perturbations, and provide specific cortical modules for the integration of oculomotor and visual signals for grasp updating. Significance StatementThe cortical mechanisms that update reach goals during eye movements are well documented, but it is not known how object features are linked to oculomotor signals when updating grasp plans. Here, we employed functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation (fMRIa) and functional connectivity analysis to identify a cluster of inferior parietal (supramarginal gyrus) and superior parietal (intraparietal and superior parietal) regions that show functional connectivity with frontal cortex saccade centers, and also show saccade-specific modulations during unexpected changes in object / grasp orientation. This provides a network - complementary to the goal updater network - that integrates visuospatial updating into grasp plans, and may help explain some of the more complex symptoms associated with parietal damage such as constructional ataxia.

neuroscience↗

Synchrony and complexity in state-related EEG networks: an application of spectral graph theory

To characterize differences between different state-related brain networks, statistical graph theory approaches have been employed to identify informative, topological properties. However, dynamical properties have been studied little in this regard. Our goal here was to introduce spectral graph theory as a reliable approach to determine dynamic properties of functional brain networks and to find how topological versus dynamical features differentiate between such networks. To this goal, 45 participants performed no task with eyes open (EO) or closed (EC) while electroencephalography data were recorded. These data were used to create weighted adjacency matrices for each condition (rest state EO and rest state EC). Then, using the spectral graph theory approach and Shannon entropy, we identified dynamical properties for weighted graphs, and we compared these features with topological aspects of graphs. The results showed that spectral graph theory can distinguish different state-dependent neural networks with different synchronies. On the other hand, correlation analysis indicated that although dynamical and topological properties of random networks are completely independent, these network features can be related in the case of brain generated graphs. In conclusion, the spectral graph theory approach can be used to make inferences about various state-related brain networks, for healthy and clinical populations.\n\nAuthor SummeryBy considering functional communications across different brain regions, a complex network is achieved that is known as functional brain network. Topologically, this network is constructed by different nodes (activity of brain regions or signals over recording electrodes) and different edges (similarity, correlation or phase difference between nodes). Paths, clusters, hubs, and centrality of nodes are examples of topological properties of these networks. However, synchrony and stability of functional brain networks can not be revealed by consideration of topological properties. Alternatively, spectral graph theory (SGT) can demonstrate the dynamic, synchrony and stability of graphs. But this approach has been studied little in brain network analysis. Here, we employed SGT, as well as topological methods, to investigate which approaches are more reliable to find differences between distinct state-related brain networks. On the other hand, we investigated correlations between topology and dynamic in different type of networks (brain generated and random networks). We found that SGT measures can clearly distinguish between distinct state-related brain networks and it can reveal synchrony and complexity of these networks. Also, results show that although dynamic and topology of random-generated graph are completely independent, these properties exhibit several correlations in the case of functional brain networks.

neuroscience↗

Transsaccadic feature interactions in multiple reference frames: an fMRIa study

Transsaccadic integration of visual features can operate in various frames of reference, but the corresponding neural mechanisms have not been differentiated. A recent fMRIa (adaptation) study identified two cortical regions in supramarginal gyrus (SMG) and extrastriate cortex that were sensitive to transsaccadic changes in stimulus orientation (Dunkley et al., 2016). Here, we modified this paradigm to identify the neural correlates for transsaccadic comparison of object orientations in: 1) Spatially Congruent (SC), 2) Retinally Congruent (RC) or 3) Spatially Incongruent (SI)) coordinates. Functional data were recorded from 12 human participants while they observed a grating (oriented 45{degrees} or 135{degrees}) before a saccade, and then judged whether a post-saccadic grating (in SC, RC, or SI configuration) had the same or different orientation. Our analysis focused on areas that showed a significant repetition suppression (Different > Same) or repetition enhancement (Same > Different) BOLD responses. Several cortical areas were significantly modulated in all three conditions: premotor/motor cortex (likely related to the manual response), and posterior-middle intraparietal sulcus. In the SC condition, uniquely activated areas included left SMG and left lateral occipitotemporal gyrus (LOtG). In the RC condition, unique areas included inferior frontal gyrus and the left lateral BA 7. In the SI condition, uniquely activated areas included the frontal eye field, medial BA 7, and right LOtG. Overall, the SC results were significantly different from both RC and SI. These data suggest that different cortical networks are used to compare pre- and post-saccadic orientation information, depending on the spatial nature of the task.\n\nSignificance StatementEvery time one makes a saccade, the brain must compare and integrate stored visual information with new information. It has recently been shown that transsaccadic integration of visual object orientation involves specific areas within parietal and occipital cortex (Dunkley et al., 2016). Here, we show that this pattern of cortical activation also depends on the spatial nature of the task: when the visual object is fixed relative to space, the eye, or relative to neither space nor the eye, different frontal, parietal, and occipital regions are engaged. More generally, these findings suggest that different aspects of trans-saccadic integration flexibly employ different cortical networks.

neuroscience↗