Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Baker, M. J.

Publications and source records attributed to Baker, M. J..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

P-Rex1 Limits the Agonist-Induced Internalisation of GPCRs Independently of its Rac-GEF Activity

The Rac-GEF P-Rex1 mediates GPCR signalling by activating the small GTPase Rac. We show here that P-Rex1 also controls GPCR trafficking. P-Rex1 inhibits the agonist-stimulated internalisation of the GPCR S1PR1 independently of its Rac-GEF activity, through its PDZ, DEP and IP4P domains. P-Rex1 also limits the agonist-induced trafficking of CXCR4, PAR4, and GLP1R, but does not control steady-state GPCR levels, nor the agonist-induced internalisation of the RTKs PDGFR and EGFR. P-Rex1 blocks the phosphorylation required for GPCR internalisation. P-Rex1 binds Grk2, both in vitro and in cells, but does not appear to regulate Grk2 activity. We propose that P-Rex1 limits the agonist-induced internalisation of GPCRs through its interaction with Grk2 to maintain high levels of active GPCR at the plasma membrane. Therefore, P-Rex1 plays a dual role in promoting GPCR responses, by controlling GPCR trafficking through an adaptor function as well as by mediating GPCR signalling through its Rac-GEF activity. HighlightsO_LIP-Rex1 controls GPCR trafficking, independently of its Rac-GEF activity C_LIO_LIP-Rex1 limits the agonist-induced internalisation of S1PR1, CXCR4, PAR4 and GLP1R C_LIO_LIP-Rex1 does not control steady-state GPCR levels, or PDGFR and EGFR trafficking C_LIO_LIP-Rex1 binds Grk2 and inhibits the phosphorylation required for GPCR internalisation C_LI eTOC blurbP-Rex1 activates Rac downstream of GPCRs to regulate processes ranging from innate immunity to neuronal plasticity, its deregulation contributing to cancer. Here, Baker et al. show that P-Rex1 also controls GPCR trafficking, limiting agonist-induced GPCR internalisation through an adaptor function. Thus, P-Rex1 promotes GPCR responses in a dual manner. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/648762v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (54K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@20e1e2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cdd416org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11f2a35org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10c2b49_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

cell biology↗

The PI3K-AKT-mTOR axis persists as a therapeutic dependency in KRASG12D-driven non-small cell lung cancer

IntroductionKRASG12C and KRASG12D inhibitors represent a major translational breakthrough for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and cancer in general by directly targeting its most mutated oncoprotein. However, resistance to these small molecules has highlighted the need for rational combination partners necessitating a critical understanding of signaling downstream of KRAS mutant isoforms. MethodsWe contrasted tumor development between KrasG12Cand KrasG12D genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs). To corroborate findings and determine mutant subtype-specific dependencies, isogenic models of KrasG12C and KrasG12D initiation and adaptation were profiled by RNA sequencing. We also employed cell line models of established KRAS mutant NSCLC and determined therapeutic vulnerabilities through pharmacological inhibition. We analysed differences in survival outcomes for patients affected by advanced KRASG12C or KRASG12D-mutant NSCLC. ResultsKRASG12D exhibited higher potency in vivo, manifesting as more rapid lung tumor formation and reduced survival of KRASG12D GEMMs compared to KRASG12C. This increased potency, recapitulated in an isogenic initiation model, was associated with enhanced PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling. However, KRASG12C oncogenicity and downstream pathway activation were comparable with KRASG12D at later stages of tumorigenesis in vitro and in vivo, consistent with similar clinical outcomes in patients. Despite this, established KRASG12D NSCLC models depended more on the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway, while KRASG12C models on the MAPK pathway. Specifically, KRASG12D inhibition was synergistically enhanced by AKT inhibition. ConclusionsOur data highlight a unique combination treatment vulnerability and suggest that patient selection strategies for combination approaches using direct KRAS inhibitors should be i) contextualised to individual RAS mutants, and ii) tailored to their downstream signaling.

cancer biology↗

Mechanisms of protein kinase C epsilon down-regulation by transforming growth factor-beta in lung cancer cells

Protein kinase C epsilon (PKC{varepsilon}), a diacylglycerol (DAG)/phorbol ester-regulated PKC isoform, has been widely linked to oncogenesis and metastasis. PKC{varepsilon} plays important roles in the regulation of motility and invasiveness in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We previously reported that this kinase becomes prominently down-regulated upon TGF-{beta}-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), which leads to prominent phenotypic changes. While the phorbol ester PMA causes down-regulation of PKC, {delta} and {varepsilon} within hours, TGF-{beta} requires at least 4 days to reduce the expression levels of PKC{varepsilon} without affecting the expression of other PKCs, an effect that parallels the acquisition of a mesenchymal phenotype. Despite the prominent transcriptional component involved in EMT, we found that PKC{varepsilon} down-regulation does not involve changes in PKC{varepsilon} mRNA levels and was entirely independent of transcriptional activation of the PRKCE gene. Further mechanistic analysis revealed that the reduction in PKC{varepsilon} expression is dependent on proteasomal and endolysosomal pathways, but independent of autophagy processing mechanisms. Site-directed mutagenesis of Lys312 and Lys321 in PKC{varepsilon} prevented its down-regulation in response to either TGF-{beta} or the phorbol ester PMA. The shift in PKC{varepsilon} isozyme levels depending on cell plasticity underscores relevant functional consequences by modulating the expression of this oncogenic/metastatic kinase and highlights key roles of protein stability mechanisms in the control of PKC{varepsilon} phenotypic outcomes.

cell biology↗

Salivary molecular spectroscopy: a rapid and non-invasive monitoring tool for diabetes mellitus during insulin treatment

Monitoring of blood glucose is an invasive, painful and costly practice in diabetes. Consequently, the search for a more cost-effective (reagent-free), non-invasive and specific diabetes monitoring method is of great interest. Attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy has been used in diagnosis of several diseases, however, applications in the monitoring of diabetic treatment are just beginning to emerge. Here, we used ATR-FTIR spectroscopy to evaluate saliva of non-diabetic (ND), diabetic (D) and diabetic 6U-treated of insulin (D6U) rats to identify potential salivary biomarkers related to glucose monitoring. The spectrum of saliva of ND, D and D6U rats displayed several unique vibrational modes and from these, two vibrational modes were pre-validated as potential diagnostic biomarkers by ROC curve analysis with significant correlation with glycemia. Compared to the ND and D6U rats, classification of D rats was achieved with a sensitivity of 100%, and an average specificity of 93.33% and 100% using bands 1452 cm-1 and 836 cm-1, respectively. Moreover, 1452 cm-1 and 836 cm-1 spectral bands proved to be robust spectral biomarkers and highly correlated with glycemia (R2 of 0.801 and 0.788, P < 0.01, respectively). Both PCA-LDA and HCA classifications achieved an accuracy of 95.2%. Spectral salivary biomarkers discovered using univariate and multivariate analysis may provide a novel robust alternative for diabetes monitoring using a non-invasive and green technology.

bioinformatics↗