Axtell, M. J. | Search bioRxiv

bioRxiv2018

Several phased siRNA annotation methods can produce frequent false-positives for 24 nucleotide RNA-dominated loci in plants

Small RNAs regulate key physiological functions in land plants. Small RNAs can be divided into two categories: microRNAs (miRNAs) and short interfering RNAs (siRNAs); siRNAs are further sub-divided into transposon/repetitive region-localized heterochromatic siRNAs and phased siRNAs (phasiRNAs). PhasiRNAs are produced from the miRNA-mediated cleavage of a Pol II RNA transcript; the miRNA cleavage site provides a defined starting point from which phasiRNAs are produced in a distinctly phased pattern. 21-22 nucleotide (nt)-dominated phasiRNA-producing loci (PHAS) are well represented in all land plants to date. In contrast, 24 nt-dominated PHAS loci are known to be encoded only in monocots and are generally restricted to male reproductive tissues. Currently, only one miRNA (miR2275) is known to trigger the production of these 24 nt-dominated PHAS loci. In this study, we use stringent methodologies in order to examine whether or not 24 nt-dominated PHAS loci also exist in Arabidopsis thaliana. We find that highly expressed heterochromatic siRNAs were consistently mis-identified as 24 nt-dominated PHAS loci using multiple PHAS-detecting algorithms. We also find that MIR2275 is not found in A. thaliana, and it seems to have been lost in the last common ancestor of Brassicales. Altogether, our research highlights the potential issues with widely used PHAS-detecting algorithms which may lead to false positives when trying to annotate new PHAS, especially 24 nt-dominated loci.

plant biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Revisiting criteria for plant miRNA annotation in the era of big data

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are ~21 nucleotide-long regulatory RNAs that arise from endonucleolytic processing of hairpin precursors. Many function as essential post-transcriptional regulators of target mRNAs and long non-coding RNAs. Alongside miRNAs, plants also produce large numbers of short interfering RNAs (siRNAs), which are distinguished from miRNAs primarily by their biogenesis (typically processed from long double-stranded RNA instead of single-stranded hairpins) and functions (typically via roles in transcriptional regulation instead of post-transcriptional regulation). Next-generation DNA sequencing methods have yielded extensive datasets of plant small RNAs, resulting in many miRNA annotations, occasionally inaccurately curated. The sheer number of endogenous siRNAs compared to miRNAs has been a major factor in the erroneous annotation of siRNAs as miRNAs. Here, we provide updated criteria for the confident annotation of plant miRNAs, suitable for the era of \"big data\" from DNA sequencing. The updated criteria emphasize replication, the minimization of false positives, and they require next-generation sequencing of small RNAs. We argue that improved annotation systems are needed for miRNAs and all other classes of plant small RNAs. Finally, to illustrate the complexities of miRNA and siRNA annotation, we review the evolution and functions of miRNAs and siRNAs in plants.

plant biology↗