Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Aubree, F.

Publications and source records attributed to Aubree, F..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Migration pulsedness alters patterns of allele fixation and local adaptation in a mainland-island model

Geneflow across populations is a critical determinant of population genetic structure, divergence and local adaptation. While evolutionary theory typically envisions geneflow as a continuous connection among populations, many processes make it fluctuating and intermittent. We analyze a mainland-island model in which migration occurs as recurrent "pulses". We derive mathematical predictions regarding how the level of migration pulsedness affects the effective migration rate, for neutral and selected mainland alleles. We find that migration pulsedness can either decrease or increase geneflow, depending on the selection regime. Migration increases gene-flow for sufficiently (counter)selected alleles (s < s1), but reduces it otherwise. We provide a mathematical approximation of the threshold selection s1, which is verified in stochastic simulations. Migration pulsedness thus affects the fixation rate at different loci in opposite ways, in a way that cannot be described as a change in effective population size. We show that migration pulsedness would generally reduce the level of local adaptation, and introduce an additional genetic load: the "pulsedness load". Our results indicate that migration pulsedness can be detrimental to the adaptation and persistence of small peripheral populations, with implications in management and conservation. Our results highlight temporally variable migration as an important process for evolutionary and population genetics.

evolutionary biology↗

How community adaptation affects biodiversity-ecosystem-functioning relationships

Evidence is growing that evolutionary dynamics can impact biodiversity-ecosystem functioning (BEF) relationships. However the nature of such impacts remains poorly understood. Here we use a modelling approach to compare random communities, with no trait evolutionary fine-tuning, and co-adapted communities, where traits have co-evolved, in terms of emerging biodiversity-productivity, biodiversitystability, and biodiversity-invasion relationships. Community adaptation impacted most BEF relationships, sometimes inverting the slope of the relationship compared to random communities. Biodiversity-productivity relationships were generally less positive among co-adapted communities, with reduced contribution of sampling effects. The effect of community-adaptation, though modest regarding invasion resistance, was striking regarding invasion tolerance: co-adapted communities could remain very tolerant to invasions even at high diversity. BEF relationships are thus contingent on the history of ecosystems and their degree of community adaptation. Short-term experiments and observations following recent changes may not be safely extrapolated into the future, once eco-evolutionary feedbacks have taken place.

evolutionary biology↗