Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ashford, A. L.

Publications and source records attributed to Ashford, A. L..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Phosphoproteomics identifies the DYRK1B protein kinase as a regulator of processing bodies

Dual-specificity tyrosine-phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1B (DYRK1B) modulates the cell cycle, cell fate during development, and is deregulated in cancer and metabolic syndrome. However, only a few DYRK1B substrates have been defined, so we undertook a phosphoproteomics screen in cells that exhibit inducible DYRK1B expression. Motif analysis revealed enrichment for proline-directed serine or threonine phosphorylation sites (pSer/pThr-Pro), consistent with the consensus motif of class I DYRKs. Gene ontology analysis revealed enrichment of proteins involved in mRNA binding, mRNA processing and ribonucleoprotein complexes. Several processing body (PB) components, including DCP1A, PATL1(PAT1B), EDC3 and 4E-T, were identified as DYRK1B-inducible phosphoproteins. DYRK1B also co-immunoprecipitated with DCP1A, PAT1B, EDC3, EDC4, DDX6 and XRN1. Super-resolution microscopy demonstrated that DYRK1B co-localised with DCP1A, DCP1B and DDX6 in PBs. Activation of DYRK1B increased PB abundance, whereas inhibition, depletion or knockout of DYRK1B reduced phosphorylation of DCP1A and 4E-T and decreased PB number. Re-expression of wild type, but not kinase-dead, DYRK1B restored PB numbers in knockout cells. These findings reveal novel DYRK1B targets and establish DYRK1B as a regulator of processing body abundance. HighlightsO_LIDYRK1B induces phosphorylation of a cluster of RNA binding and processing body associated proteins. C_LIO_LIDYRK1B localises to PBs and associates with multiple PB components. C_LIO_LIDYRK1B controls P-body abundance in a kinase-dependent manner. C_LI

cell biology↗

Alignment between Duplex Sequencing and transgenic rodent mutation assay data in the assessment of in vivo NDMA-induced mutagenesis

The nitrosamine N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) is a mutagen and rodent carcinogen that has been identified as a process impurity in some commercially available medicines, leading to market withdrawals and new impurity control measures. Error-corrected DNA sequencing techniques, such as Duplex Sequencing (DS), have error rates low enough to revolutionise genetic toxicology testing by directly measuring in vivo mutagenesis within days of exposure. Here, DS was performed on liver samples from an OECD-compliant, Transgenic Rodent Gene Mutation Assay (TGR) conducted under GLP standards. MutaMouse specimens were orally dosed with NDMA using either a repeat-dose 28-day regimen (0.02-4 mg/kg(bw)/day) or single bolus doses of either 5 or 10 mg/kg(bw) administered on day one. Dose-dependent increases in mutation frequency were detected by DS in liver, enabling a No-Observed Genotoxic Effect Level (NOGEL) of 0.07 mg/kg(bw)/day to be determined, supported by mechanistic analyses of trinucleotide mutation spectra. Benchmark dose (BMD) modelling determined similar BMD50 values from either DS or TGR, demonstrating concordance across the two techniques albeit with greater precision from DS due to smaller inter-animal variation. DS offers a fundamental change in mutagenicity assessments enabling more precise point-of-departure determinations with mechanistic clarity and 3Rs advantages compared to the standard TGR approach.

pharmacology and toxicology↗