Biology subjects

Apps, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Apps, M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Fatigue-related changes in value-based decision-making during listening are associated with increased frontal cortical activation

Hearing aid users commonly report listening-related fatigue, which may contribute to disengagement from demanding listening situations and negative psychosocial outcomes. Hearing rehabilitation currently lacks strategies to mitigate listening fatigue, partly because fatigue build-up and its consequences are difficult to measure beyond self-report. This study investigated whether value-based listening decisions and associated frontal cortical activity are modulated by fatigue. Thirty hearing aid users completed a one-hour listening paradigm while cortical hemodynamic activity was measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). On each trial, participants decided whether to engage in listening or rest based on an offer defined by expected task difficulty and reward, and rated their momentary fatigue. Fatigue ratings increased over time, and unsuccessful listening trials were associated with larger subsequent increases in fatigue, suggesting that performance contributed to changes in self-reported fatigue. Listen-versus-rest decisions followed the expected effort-reward trade-off, with participants more likely to accept offers that provided higher rewards and lower listening demands. Over the course of the experiment, participants became less likely to accept listening offers; however, neither time on task nor subjective fatigue altered the weighting of reward and difficulty. In contrast, frontal cortical activation during evaluation of accepted offers increased over time for high-difficulty offers with low or medium rewards. Follow-up analyses indicated that frontal oxygenation and listening decisions were more strongly associated with time on task than with subjective fatigue ratings. Together, these findings suggest that behavioral and neural measures obtained before listening capture fatigue-related processes beyond self-report, providing a basis for identifying and potentially addressing fatigue in hearing rehabilitation.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Distinct neural representations for prosocial and self-benefitting effort

Prosocial behaviours - actions that benefit others - are central to individual and societal well-being. Most prosocial acts are effortful. Yet, how the brain encodes effort costs when actions benefit others is unknown. Here, using a combination of multivariate representational similarity analysis and model-based univariate analysis during fMRI, we reveal how the costs of prosocial efforts are processed. Strikingly, we identified a unique neural signature of effort in the anterior cingulate gyrus for prosocial acts both when choosing to help others and when exerting force for their benefit. This pattern was absent for similar self-benefitting behaviour and correlated with individual levels of empathy. In contrast, the ventral tegmental area and the ventral insula signalled subjective value preferentially when choosing whether to exert effort to benefit oneself. These findings demonstrate partially distinct brain areas guide the evaluation and exertion of effort costs when acts are prosocial or self-benefitting.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2019

Dopamine and motivational state drive dynamics of human decision making

The mesolimbic dopaminergic system exerts a crucial influence on incentive processing. However, the contribution of dopamine in dynamic, ecological situations where reward rates vary, and decisions evolve over time, remains unclear. In such circumstances, current (foreground) reward accrual needs to be compared continuously with potential rewards that could be obtained by travelling elsewhere (background reward rate), in order to determine the opportunity cost of staying versus leaving. We hypothesised that dopamine specifically modulates the influence of background - but not foreground - reward information when making a dynamic comparison of these variables for optimal behaviour. On a novel foraging task based on an ecological account of animal behaviour (marginal value theorem), human participants were required to decide when to leave locations in situations where foreground rewards depleted at different rates, either in rich or poor environments with high or low background rates. In line with theoretical accounts, peoples decisions to move from current locations were independently modulated by both foreground and background reward rates. Pharmacological manipulation of dopamine D2 receptor activity using the agonist cabergoline significantly affected decisions to move on, specifically modulating the effect of background but not foreground rewards rates. In particular, when on cabergoline, people left patches in poor environments much earlier. These results demonstrate a role of dopamine in signalling the opportunity cost of rewards, not value per se. Using this ecologically derived framework we uncover a specific mechanism by which D2 dopamine receptor activity modulates decision-making when foreground and background reward rates are dynamically compared. Significance statementMany decisions, across economic, political and social spheres, involve choices to "leave". Such decisions depend on a continuous comparison of a current locations value, with that of other locations you could move on to. However, how the brain makes such decisions is poorly understood. Here, we developed a computerized task, based around theories of how animals make decisions to move on when foraging for food. Healthy human participants had to decide when to leave collecting financial rewards in a location, and travel to collect rewards elsewhere. Using a pharmacological manipulation, we show that the activity of dopamine in the brain modulates decisions to move on, with people valuing other locations differently depending on their dopaminergic state.

neuroscience↗