Search bioRxivSearch

Biology subjects

Ao, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Ao, D..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Evaluation of Synergy Extrapolation for Predicting Unmeasured Muscle Excitations from Measured Muscle Synergies

Electromyography (EMG)-driven musculoskeletal modeling relies on high-quality measurements of muscle electrical activity to estimate muscle forces. However, a critical challenge for practical deployment of this approach is missing EMG data from muscles that contribute substantially to joint moments. This situation may arise due to either the inability to measure deep muscles with surface electrodes or the lack of a sufficient number of EMG electrodes. Muscle synergy analysis is a dimensionality-reduction approach to decompose a large number of muscle excitations into a small number of time-varying synergy excitations along with time-invariant synergy weights that define the contribution of each corresponding synergy excitation to a specific muscle excitation. This study evaluates how accurately missing muscle excitations can be predicted using synergy excitations extracted from muscles with available EMGs (henceforth called "synergy extrapolation"). The results were reported on a gait dataset collected from a stroke survivor walking on an instrumented treadmill at self-selected and fastest-comfortable speeds. The evaluation process started with full calibration of a lower-body EMG-driven model using 16-channel EMGs (including surface and indwelling) in each leg. One indwelling EMG (either iliopsoas or adductor longus) was then treated as unmeasured at a time. The synergy weights associated with the unmeasured muscle were predicted through solving a nonlinear optimization problem where the errors between inverse dynamics and EMG-driven joint moments were minimized. We also quantitatively evaluated how synergy analysis algorithms (principal component analysis (PCA) and non-negative matrix factorization (NMF)), EMG normalization methods, and number of synergies affect the accuracy of the predicted unmeasured muscle excitation. Synergy extrapolation performance was most influenced by the choice of synergy analysis algorithm and number of synergies. PCA with 5 or 6 synergies consistently predicted unmeasured muscle excitations most accurately and with greatest robustness to choice of EMG normalization method. Furthermore, the associated joint moment matching accuracy was comparable to that produced by the full EMG-driven calibration. The synergy extrapolation method described in this study may facilitate the assessment of human neuromuscular control and biomechanics in response to surgical or rehabilitation treatment when important EMG signals are missing.

bioengineering

How Well Do Commonly Used Co-Contraction Indices Approximate Lower Limb Joint Stiffness Trends during Gait?

Muscle co-contraction generates joint stiffness to improve stability and accuracy during limb movement but at the expense of higher energetic cost. The quantification of joint stiffness generated from muscle co-contraction is difficult through both experimental and computational means for its benefit and cost to be assessed. Quantification of muscle co-contraction may offer an alternative path for estimating joint stiffness. By choosing the commonly used Co-Contraction Indices (CCIs) to represent muscle co-contraction, this study investigated the feasibility of using CCI to approximate lower limb joint stiffness trends during gait. A calibrated EMG-driven musculoskeletal model of a hemiparetic individual post-stroke from a previous study was used to generate the quantities required for CCI calculation and model-based estimation of joint stiffness. A total of 14 classes of CCIs for various combinations of antagonistic muscle pairs were calculated based on two common CCI formulations, each with 7 types of quantities that included variations of electromyography (EMG) signals and joint moments from the muscles. Correlations between CCIs and model-based estimates of sagittal plane stiffness of the lower extremity joints (hip, knee, ankle) were computed. Although moderate to strong correlation was observed between some CCI formulations and the corresponding joint stiffness, these associations were highly dependent on the methodological choices made for CCI computation. The overall findings of this study were the following: (1) the formulation proposed by Rudolph et al. (2000), CCI1, was more correlated with joint stiffness than that of Falconer and Winter (1985); (2) Moment-based CCI1 from individual antagonistic muscle pairs was more correlated than EMG-based CCI1; (3) EMG signals with calibrated electromechanical delay and joint moment generated by individual muscle without normalization to a reference value were the most correlated for EMG-based CCI1 and moment-based CCI1, respectively. The combination of antagonistic muscle pairs for most correlated within each CCI class was also identified. By using CCI to approximate joint stiffness trends, this study may open an alternative path to studying joint stiffness.

bioengineering