Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Angenent, G. C.

Publications and source records attributed to Angenent, G. C..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Secondary growth in the tomato stem is suppressed by the flowering regulators FUL2 and STM3

Herbaceous eudicot crops such as tomato accumulate substantial amounts of secondary xylem in their stems, particularly in the basal part. As plants progress from the vegetative phase to flowering and fruit development, secondary growth continues to provide mechanical support and facilitate transport. To uncover how secondary growth is regulated in the tomato stem, we used laser capture microdissection RNA-seq to establish tissue-specific transcriptomic profiles. This revealed that key regulators associated with wood formation in poplar are also acting in tomato. Furthermore, we found that the flowering regulators FUL2 and STM3 are substantially expressed in xylem tissue. Subsequent functional analysis identified FUL2 and STM3 as key repressors of secondary growth, with ful2 or stm3 knock-out mutants exhibiting strongly increased secondary growth in older tomato stems. Notably, a higher order mutant in which both ful2 and stm3 were knocked out displays a similar non-additive phenotype, indicating, together with yeast two-hybrid data showing physical interaction, that FUL2 and STM3 act together in a complex. The expression levels of both genes remain low until after the floral transition but strongly rise during subsequent stem development. Transcriptomic analyses in ful2, stm3, and wild-type stems at stages before and after detectable anatomical differences, showed that the FUL2-STM3 complex represses distinct sets of NAC and MYB candidate regulators associated with xylem development. Interestingly, FUL2 and STM3 control these regulators in a stage- and position-dependent way, with candidates showing upregulation only at later stages in mid-height stems being already upregulated at earlier stages in basal stem regions. Our findings provide a tissue-resolved transcriptomic resource for tomato stems and reveal a role for FUL2 and STM3 in limiting secondary xylem accumulation as stem development progresses.

plant biology↗

Identification of the rice Rc gene as a main regulator of seed survival under dry storage conditions

Seed deterioration during storage results in poor germination, reduced seed vigor, and non-uniform seedling emergence. The rate of aging depends on storage conditions (RH, temperature, and oxygen) and genetic factors. This study aims to identify these genetic factors determining the longevity of rice seeds stored under experimental aging conditions mimicking long-term dry storage. Genetic variation for tolerance to aging was studied in 300 Indica rice accessions and storing dry seeds under elevated partial pressure of oxygen (EPPO) condition, using a genome-wide association study. The association analysis yielded eleven unique regions across the genome for all measured germination parameters after aging. These genomic regions differed from regions previously identified in rice under humid experimental aging conditions. The significant single nucleotide polymorphism in the most prominent region was located within the Rc gene, encoding a bHLH transcription factor. Storage experiments using isogenic rice lines (SD7-1D (Rc) and SD7-1d (rc)) with the same allelic variation confirmed the functional role of the Rc gene, conferring a stronger tolerance to dry EPPO aging. A functional Rc gene results in the accumulation of pro-anthocyanidins in the pericarp of rice seeds, an important sub-class of flavonoids having strong antioxidant activity, which may explain why genotypes with an allelic variation for this gene show variation in seed tolerance to dry EPPO aging.

plant biology↗

A gene regulatory network critical for axillary bud dormancy directly controlled by Arabidopsis BRANCHED1

The control of branch outgrowth is critical for plant fitness, stress resilience and crop yield. The Arabidopsis thaliana transcription factor BRANCHED1 (BRC1) plays a pivotal role in this process as it integrates signals that inhibit axillary bud growth to control shoot branching. Despite the remarkable activity of BRC1 as a potent growth inhibitor, the mechanisms by which it promotes and maintains bud dormancy are still largely unknown. Here we combine ChIP-seq, transcriptomic and systems biology approaches to characterise the BRC1-regulated gene network. We identify a group of BRC1 direct target genes encoding transcription factors (BTFs) that orchestrate, together with BRC1, an intricate transcriptional network enriched in abscisic acid signalling components. The BRC1 network is enriched in feed-forward loops and feed-back loops, robust against noise and mutation, reversible in response to stimuli, and stable once established. This knowledge is fundamental to adapt plant architecture and crop production to ever-changing environmental conditions.

plant biology↗

FRUITFULL-like genes regulate flowering time and inflorescence architecture in tomato

The timing of flowering and inflorescence architecture are critical for the reproductive success of tomato, but the gene regulatory networks underlying these traits have not been fully explored. Here we show that the tomato FRUITFULL-like (FUL-like) genes FUL2 and MADS-BOX PROTEIN 20 (MBP20) induce flowering and repress inflorescence branching by promoting floral meristem determinacy. FUL1 fulfils a less prominent role and appears to depend on FUL2 and MBP20 for its upregulation in the inflorescence- and floral meristems. MBP10, the fourth tomato FUL-like gene, has probably lost its function. The tomato FUL-like proteins cannot homodimerize in in vitro assays, but heterodimerize with various other MADS-domain proteins, potentially forming distinct complexes in the transition meristem and floral meristem. Transcriptome analysis of the primary shoot meristems revealed various interesting downstream targets, including four repressors of cytokinin signalling that are upregulated during the vegetative-to-reproductive transition in ful1 ful2 mbp10 mbp20 mutants. FUL2 and MBP20 can also bind in vitro to the upstream regions of these genes, thereby probably directly stimulating cell division in the meristem upon the transition to flowering. The control of inflorescence branching does not occur via the CKXs, but appears regulated by repression of transcription factors such as TM3, APETALA 2b (AP2b) and AP2a.

plant biology↗