Biology subjects

Amster, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Amster, G..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2021

The impact of genetic modifiers on variation in germline mutation rates within and among human populations

Mutation rates and spectra differ among human populations. Here, we examine whether this variation could be explained by evolution at mutation modifiers. To this end, we consider genetic modifier sites at which mutations, "mutator alleles", increase genome-wide mutation rates and model their evolution under purifying selection due to the additional deleterious mutations that they cause, genetic drift, and demographic processes. We solve the model analytically for a constant population size and characterize how evolution at modifier sites impacts variation in mutation rates within and among populations. We then use simulations to study the effects of modifier sites under a plausible demographic model for Africans and Europeans. When comparing populations that evolve independently, weakly selected modifier sites (2Nes {approx} 1), which evolve slowly, contribute the most to variation in mutation rates. In contrast, when populations recently split from a common ancestral population, strongly selected modifier sites (2Nes >> 1), which evolve rapidly, contribute the most to variation between them. Moreover, a modest number of modifier sites (e.g., 10 per mutation type in the standard classification into 96 types) subject to moderate to strong selection (2Nes > 1) could account for the variation in mutation rates observed among human populations. If such modifier sites indeed underlie differences among populations, they should also cause variation in mutation rates within populations and their effects should be detectable in pedigree studies.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2021

Broad-scale variation in human genetic diversity levels is predicted by purifying selection on coding and non-coding elements

Analyses of genetic variation in many taxa have established that neutral genetic diversity is shaped by natural selection at linked sites. Whether the mode of selection is primarily the fixation of strongly beneficial alleles (selective sweeps) or purifying selection on deleterious mutations (background selection) remains unknown, however. We address this question in humans by fitting a model of the joint effects of selective sweeps and background selection to autosomal polymorphism data from the 1000 Genomes Project. After controlling for variation in mutation rates along the genome, a model of background selection alone explains [~]60% of the variance in diversity levels at the megabase scale. Adding the effects of selective sweeps driven by adaptive substitutions to the model does not improve the fit, and when both modes of selection are considered jointly, selective sweeps are estimated to have had little or no effect on linked neutral diversity. The regions under purifying selection are best predicted by phylogenetic conservation, with [~]80% of the deleterious mutations affecting neutral diversity occurring in non-exonic regions. Thus, background selection is the dominant mode of linked selection in humans, with marked effects on diversity levels throughout autosomes.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Changes in life history and population size can explain relative neutral diversity levels on X and autosomes in extant human populations

In human populations, relative levels of neutral polymorphism on the X and autosomes differ markedly from each other and from the naive theoretical expectation of [3/4]. These differences have attracted considerable attention, with studies highlighting several potential causes, including male biased mutation and reproductive variance, historical changes in population size, and selection at linked loci. We revisit this question in light of our new theory about the effects of life history and given pedigree-based estimates of the dependence of human mutation rates on sex and age. We demonstrate that life history effects, particularly higher generation times in males than females, likely had multiple effects on human X-to-autosomes (X:A) polymorphism ratios, through the extent of male mutation bias, the equilibrium X:A ratios of effective population sizes, and differential responses to changes in population size. We also show that the standard approach of using divergence between species to correct for the male bias in mutation results in biased estimates of X:A effective population size ratios. We obtain alternative estimates using pedigree-based estimates of the male mutation bias, which reveal X:A ratios of effective population sizes to be considerably greater than previously appreciated. We then show that the joint effects of historical changes in life history and population size can explain X:A polymorphism ratios in extant human populations. Our results suggest that ancestral human populations were highly polygynous; that non-African populations experienced a substantial reduction in polygyny and/or increase in male-biased generation times around the out of Africa bottleneck; and that extant diversity levels were affected by fairly recent changes in sex-specific life history.\n\nSignificance StatementAll else being equal, the ratio of diversity levels on X and autosomes at selectively neutral sites should mirror the ratio of their numbers in the population and thus equal [3/4]. In reality, the ratios observed across human populations differ markedly from [3/4] and from each other. Because from a population perspective, autosomes spend an equal number of generations in both sexes while the X spends twice as many generations in females, these departures from the naive expectations likely reflect differences between male and female life histories and their effects on mutation processes. Indeed, we show that the ratios observed across human populations can be explained by demographic history, assuming plausible, sex-specific mutation rates, generation times and reproductive variances.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2018

Overlooked roles of DNA damage and maternal age in generating human germline mutations

Although the textbook view is that most germline mutations arise from replication errors, when analyzing large de novo mutation datasets in humans, we find multiple lines of evidence that call that understanding into question. Notably, despite the drastic increase in the ratio of male to female germ cell divisions after the onset of spermatogenesis, even young fathers contribute three times more mutations than young mothers, and this ratio barely increases with parental ages. This surprising finding points to a substantial contribution of damage-induced mutations. Indeed, C to G transversions and CpG transitions, which together constitute one third of all mutations, show genomic distributions and sex-specific age dependencies indicative of doublestrand break repair and methylation-associated damage, respectively. Moreover, the data indicate that maternal age at conception influences the mutation rate both because of the accumulation of damage in oocytes and potentially through an influence on the number of postzygotic mutations.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2017

Life history effects on neutral polymorphism levels of autosomes and sex chromosomes

All else being equal, the ratio of genetic diversity levels on X and autosomes at selectively neutral sites should mirror the ratio of their numbers in the population and thus equal [3/4]. Because X chromosomes spend twice as many generations in females as in males, however, the ratio of diversity levels is also affected by sex differences in life history. The effects of life history on diversity levels, notably those of sex-specific age structures and reproductive variances, have been studied for decades, yet existing theory relies on many parameters that are difficult to measure and lacks generality in ways that limit their applicability. We derive general yet simple expressions for these effects and show that life history effects on X-to-autosome (X:A) ratios of diversity levels depend only on sex-ratios of mutation rates, generation times, and reproductive variances. These results reveal that changing the sex-ratio of generation times has opposite effects on X:A ratios of polymorphism and divergence. They also explain how sex-specific life histories modulate the response of X:A polymorphism ratios to changes in population size. More generally, they clarify that sex-specific life history--generation times in particular--should have a marked effect on X:A polymorphism ratios in many taxa and enable the investigation of these effects.\n\nSignificance StatementUnderstanding the determinants of neutral diversity patterns on autosomes and sex chromosomes provides a bedrock for our interpretation of population genetic data. Sex-specific age-structure and variation in reproductive success have long been thought to affect neutral diversity, but theoretical descriptions of these effects were complicated and/or lacked in generality, stymying attempts to relate diversity patterns of species with their life history. We derive general yet simple expressions for these effects, which clarify how they impact neutral diversity and should enable studies of relative diversity levels on the autosomes and sex chromosomes in many taxa.

evolutionary biology↗