Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Amirani, N.

Publications and source records attributed to Amirani, N..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Predictive Cellular Signatures from Live Human Motor Neurons Distinguish TDP-43 ALS and Enable ALS Subtype Stratification

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the progressive, rapid deterioration of motor neurons (MNs). Rare mutations in a handful of genes are sufficient to cause ALS; however, 90% of ALS cases are not linked to these genes and their underlying cause remains unknown. Abnormal subcellular distribution, structure or aggregation of the TDP-43 protein are nearly universal hallmarks of the disease, suggesting a shared molecular mechanism across both genetic and sporadic ALS (sALS). However, the heterogeneity of the ALS clinical syndrome suggests that the underlying mechanisms culminating in ALS and TDP-43 pathology may partly differ among individuals and may need to be understood to develop successful therapies that target subgroups of patients. Here, we harnessed the power of machine learning (ML) to begin to decode, in a systematic and unbiased fashion, the cellular signatures of ALS. We used high-content imaging of live, human iPSC-derived motor neurons (iMNs) from ALS patients or gene-edited and gene-corrected TDP-43 mutant lines to train shallow connected ML algorithms (SMLs) and deep convolutional neural networks (DNNs). Our models identified and distinguished mutant and control iMNs with moderately high accuracy. We then used explainability methods to uncover the discriminating cellular signals and found that the strongest ones mapped to the nuclear area, suggesting underlying alterations within the nucleus. We validated this finding by revealing that TDP-43 mutant iMNs display alterations in nucleocytoplasmic shuttling and cellular integrity. Further, a time-interaction ML model uncovered dynamic morphological transitions preceding degeneration, offering a window into early pathogenic events as well as neurodevelopmental changes. Extending our ML pipeline to iMNs with mutations in the ALS gene C9orf72 or derived from sALS revealed both overlapping and distinguishable signatures, suggesting shared yet distinct mechanistic pathways. Together, these findings establish ML-driven phenotypic profiling as a powerful approach to stratify people with ALS, help disentangle the molecular heterogeneity of ALS and produce a more holistic phenotypic definition in cell-based models, and ultimately find causes and treatments. This strategy offers a scalable and innovative paradigm for uncovering early disease mechanisms not only in ALS but potentially across a spectrum of neurodegenerative and sporadic disorders.

neuroscience↗

Molecular dynamics simulations of intrinsically disordered protein regions enable biophysical interpretation of variant effect predictors

Predictive models for missense variant pathogenicity offer little functional interpretation for intrinsically disordered regions, since they rely on conservation and coevolution across homologous sequences. To understand the extent to which biophysics modulates model performance compared to genomic conservation, we model biophysics of IDRs explicitly for improved interpretation of variant effects. We develop MDmis, a method that uses biophysical features extracted from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of IDRs to predict pathogenicity. We find that pathogenic variants in Long IDRs manifest differently, with transient order and depleted solvent access, compared to those in Short IDRs. Using MD simulations of sequences with single missense variants, we identify stronger evidence for pathogenic effects in Long IDRs compared to Short IDRs. MDmis, when combined with conservation information, achieves strong predictive accuracy of pathogenicity of variants in Long IDRs. Overall, extracting information from MD simulations can help understand the drivers of predictive performance and elucidate biophysical behaviors affected by pathogenic variants.

bioinformatics↗

RMeDPower for Biology: guiding design, experimental structure and analyses of repeated measures data for biological studies

Lack of experimental reproducibility has plagued efforts to understand biology at both basic biomedical and preclinical levels. The cause is often improperly powered experiments and the use of inadequate statistical tools. To overcome these problems, we developed RMeDPower2, a complete, user-friendly package of tools in R that will allow scientists that are not deeply familiar with statistical analyses to predict the scope and size of biological data they need when conducting experiments with a repeated measures design. RMeDPower2 is based on Generalized Linear Mixed Effects Models (GLMM), which are better suited to the statistical analysis of these experiments than ANOVA or t-tests. We illustrate the use of RMeDPower2 and compare it to t- test for power calculations, using our own pilot studies of iPSC-derived motor neurons (iMNs) from sporadic ALS (sALS) patients versus healthy controls. We report that sALS iMNs display reduced numbers of soma- emanating processes compared to control iMNs using RMeDPower2. We expect RMeDPower2 to find applications far beyond cell assays, from single-cell RNAseq experiments to brain slice electrophysiology or animal behavior. MotivationThe lack of rigor and reproducibility in biomedical research has caused a crisis that has been highlighted in the popular literature and has become a focus for the National Institutes of Health1-3. It has been estimated that the majority of published empirical observations cannot be reproduced4-9, rendering nearly futile any effort to build on these observations to further our understanding of basic biological mechanisms or design effective therapeutic approaches. Further, the resources and time spent attempting to reproduce findings from low-quality or incorrectly acquired data are estimated to cost the global scientific community about 200 billion dollars per year10. The root cause lies in experimental designs that are not structured or powered adequately for conclusive statistical analyses. Since all biomedical researchers cannot be expected to have a deep knowledge of statistics or easy access to trained statisticians, tools are desperately needed to help them check the design of their experiments and apply adequate statistical power estimation. Not only could this improve our confidence in scientific outcomes, it could help make biological experiments more time-efficient and cost-effective. For example, if a researcher could estimate how many experiments should be performed and how many cell lines, animals or tissue samples should be collected to achieve sufficient statistical power to test their hypothesis, they may adjust their experimental design to fit their time or budgetary constraints without jeopardizing the quality of their findings. Another source of scientific errors comes from technologies such as scRNA-seq, whose advances are leading to a rapid increase in studies involving so-called "pseudo-replication", which treats non-independent measures as if they were independent. For example, carrying out multiple measurements on a single sample instead of using separate, independent samples would represent non-independent replication. The risk of pseudo-replication11 (illustrated further below), can be remedied by the implementation of rigorous statistical methods that apply to all aspects of the data arising from such designs.

cell biology↗