Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Amezian, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Amezian, D..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Genome sequence and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in the solanacea specialist pest Tetranychus evansi

Tetranychus evansi is an invasive spider mite pest of solanaceous crops worldwide. Its global expansion and ability to rapidly develop acaricide resistance highlight the need for robust genomic resources and functional genetic tools to design custom control strategies. Here, we deliver a high-quality genome assembly and establish efficient CRISPR/Cas9 editing in T. evansi to enable mechanistic studies of host adaptation and pesticide resistance. Using an inbred line and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) long-read sequencing ([~]36x), we assembled an 89 Mb genome into 13 contigs (N50 = 18.6 Mb) with high completeness and annotated 14,246 protein-coding genes. We manually curated the principal detoxification gene families (P450s, CCEs, GSTs, UGTs, ABC transporters and DOGs), revealing consistently smaller repertoires than in the highly polyphagous relative Tetranychus urticae. To enable reverse genetics, we adapted SYNCAS (saponin + branched amphiphilic peptide capsules) for maternal delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 in T. evansi. Targeting the phytoene desaturase (PD) pigmentation marker produced reliable knockouts with visible albinism and mean editing efficiencies of [~]9.6-14.7%, allowing establishment of stable mutant lines. We further applied precision gene editing to knock-in (KI) the M918T and M918L substitutions into the voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC). While M918L was lethal in T. evansi, we generated multiple homozygous lines for M918T (mean KI [~]4.4%). Bioassays demonstrated that while the mutation caused extremely high levels of bifenthrin resistance (RR>1000), this was less so for cyfluthrin (RR=164), revealing the independent and specific role of M918T in pyrethroid resistance. Collectively, these resources establish T. evansi as a tractable system for reverse genetic analysis and provide a reference for future comparative and population genomics.

genetics↗

Agricultural fungicides inadvertently influence the fitness of Colorado potato beetles, Leptinotarsa decemlineata, and their susceptibility to insecticides

The Colorado potato beetle (CPB), Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say), is an agricultural pest of solanaceous crops which has developed insecticide resistance at an alarming rate. Up to this point, little consideration has been given to unintended, or inadvertent effects that non-insecticide xenobiotics may have on insecticide susceptibility in L. decemlineata. Fungicides, such as chlorothalonil and boscalid, are often used to control fungal pathogens in potato fields and are applied at regular intervals when L. decemlineata populations are present in the crop. In order to determine whether fungicide use may be associated with elevated levels of insecticide resistance in L. decemlineata, we examined phenotypic responses in L. decemlineata to the fungicides chlorothalonil and boscalid. Using enzymatic and transcript abundance investigations we also examined modes of molecular detoxification in response to both insecticide (imidacloprid) and fungicide (boscalid and chlorothalonil) application to more specifically determine if fungicides and insecticides induce similar metabolic detoxification mechanisms. Both chlorothalonil and boscalid exposure induced a phenotypic, enzymatic and transcript response in L. decemlineata which correlates with known mechanisms of insecticide resistance.\n\nKey MessagesO_LIPrior-exposure to a fungicidal application changes the phenotypic response of Leptinotarsa decemlineata to the insecticide imidacloprid\nC_LIO_LIBoth a fungicide and insecticide application activates similar molecular mechanisms of detoxification in Leptinotarsa decemlineata\nC_LIO_LIFungicidal xenobiotics may contribute to insecticide resistance in Leptinotarsa decemlineata\nC_LI\n\nAuthor Contribution StatementJC, SS, CB, AH, and RG conceived and designed research. JC, AC, DA, TD, and BS conducted experiments. JC and AC analyzed data. JC and RG wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

ecology↗