Search bioRxiv⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Amelsvoort, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Amelsvoort, T..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Converging pathways found in copy number variation syndromes with high schizophrenia risk

Schizophrenia genetics is complex, and the contribution of common and rare variants are not fully understood. Several specific copy number variations (CNVs) confer increased risk for schizophrenia, and the study of their effects is central to molecular models of mental illness. However, these CNVs - microdeletions or -duplications - are spread across the genome and differ in the number of genes affected and classes of coded proteins. This suggests that, in order to fully understand the contribution of these genetic variants to mental illness, we need to look beyond the deleted or duplicated genes, to their interaction partners and involved molecular pathways. In this study, we developed machine-readable interactive pathways to enable analysis of downstream effects of genes within CNV loci and identify common pathways between CNVs with high schizophrenia risk using the WikiPathways database, and schizophrenia risk gene collections from GWAS studies and a gene-disease association database. For CNVs that are pathogenic for schizophrenia, we found overlapping pathways, including BDNF signaling, cytoskeleton, cell-cell connections, inflammation and MAPK3 signaling. Common schizophrenia risk genes identified by different studies are found in all CNV pathways but not enriched. Our findings suggest that specific pathways - such as BDNF signaling - may be critical contributors to schizophrenia risk conferred by rare CNVs, and common risk variants may operate through distinct mechanisms. Our approach also highlights the importance of not only investigating deleted or duplicated genes within pathogenic CNV loci, but also study their direct interaction partners, which may explain pleiotropic effects of CNVs on schizophrenia risk.

systems biology↗

Asymmetric effects of acute stress on cost and benefit learning

Stressful events trigger a complex physiological reaction - the fight-or-flight response - that can hamper flexible decision-making. Inspired by key neural and peripheral characteristics of the fight-or-flight response, here we ask whether acute stress changes how humans learn about costs and benefits. Participants were randomly exposed to an acute stress or no-stress control condition after which they completed a cost-benefit reinforcement learning task. Acute stress improved learning to maximize benefits (monetary rewards) relative to minimising energy expenditure (grip force). Using computational modelling, we demonstrate that costs and benefits can exert asymmetric effects on decisions when prediction errors that convey information about the reward value and cost of actions receive inappropriate importance; a process associated with distinct alterations in pupil size fluctuations. These results provide new insights into learning strategies under acute stress - which, depending on the context, may be maladaptive or beneficial - and candidate neuromodulatory mechanisms that could underlie such behaviour.

neuroscience↗