Biology subjects

Alvis Brazma

Publications and source records attributed to Alvis Brazma.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2014

Identification, annotation and visualisation of extreme changes in splicing from RNA-seq experiments with SwitchSeq

In the past years, RNA sequencing has become the method of choice for the study of transcriptome composition. When working with this type of data, several tools exist to quantify differences in splicing across conditions and to address the significance of those changes. However, the number of genes predicted to undergo differential splicing is often high, and further interpretation of the results becomes a challenging task. Here we present SwitchSeq, a novel set of tools designed to help the users in the interpretation of differential splicing events that affect protein coding genes. More specifically, we provide a framework to identify switch events, i.e., cases where, for a given gene, the identity of the most abundant transcript changes across conditions. The identified events are then annotated by incorporating information from several public databases and third-party tools, and are further visualised in an intuitive manner with the independent R package tviz. All the results are displayed in a self-contained HTML document, and are also stored in txt and json format to facilitate the integration with any further downstream analysis tools. Such analysis approach can be used complementarily to Gene Ontology and pathway enrichment analysis, and can also serve as an aid in the validation of predicted changes in mRNA and protein abundance. The latest version of SwitchSeq, including installation instructions and use cases, can be found at https://github.com/mgonzalezporta/SwitchSeq. Additionally, the plot capabilities are provided as an independent R package at https://github.com/mgonzalezporta/tviz.

Bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2014

iRAP - an integrated RNA-seq Analysis Pipeline

RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) has become the technology of choice for whole-transcriptome profiling. However, processing the millions of sequence reads generated requires considerable bioinformatics skills and computational resources. At each step of the processing pipeline many tools are available, each with specific advantages and disadvantages. While using a specific combination of tools might be desirable, integrating the different tools can be time consuming, often due to specificities in the formats of input/output files required by the different programs. Here we present iRAP, an integrated RNA-seq analysis pipeline that allows the user to select and apply their preferred combination of existing tools for mapping reads, quantifying expression, testing for differential expression. iRAP also includes multiple tools for gene set enrichment analysis and generates web browsable reports of the results obtained in the different stages of the pipeline. Depending upon the application, iRAP can be used to quantify expression at the gene, exon or transcript level. iRAP is aimed at a broad group of users with basic bioinformatics training and requires little experience with the command line. Despite this, it also provides more advanced users with the ability to customise the options used by their chosen tools.

Bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2014

RNA-seq gene profiling - a systematic empirical comparison

Accurately quantifying gene expression levels is a key goal of experiments using RNA-sequencing to assay the transcriptome. This typically requires aligning the short reads generated to the genome or transcriptome before quantifying expression of pre-defined sets of genes. Differences in the alignment/quantification tools can have a major effect upon the expression levels found with important consequences for biological interpretation. Here we address two main issues: do different analysis pipelines affect the gene expression levels inferred from RNA-seq data? And, how close are the expression levels inferred to the \"true\" expression levels?\n\nWe evaluate fifty gene profiling pipelines in experimental and simulated data sets with different characteristics (e.g, read length and sequencing depth). In the absence of knowledge of the ground truth in real RNAseq data sets, we used simulated data to assess the differences between the \"true\" expression and those reconstructed by the analysis pipelines. Even though this approach does not take into account all known biases present in RNAseq data, it still allows to estimate the accuracy of the gene expression values inferred by different analysis pipelines. The results show that i) overall there is a high correlation between the expression levels inferred by the best pipelines and the true quantification values; ii) the error in the estimated gene expression values can vary considerably across genes; and iii) a small set of genes have expression estimates with consistently high error (across data sets and methods). Finally, although the mapping software is important, the quantification method makes a greater difference to the results.

Bioinformatics↗