Biology subjects

Alves, J. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Alves, J. M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2017

Host shifts result in parallel genetic changes when viruses adapt to closely related species

Host shifts, where a pathogen invades and establishes in a new host species, are a major source of emerging infectious diseases. They frequently occur between related host species and often rely on the pathogen evolving adaptations that increase their fitness in the novel host species. To investigate genetic changes in novel hosts, we experimentally evolved replicate lineages of an RNA virus (Drosophila C Virus) in 19 different species of Drosophilidae and deep sequenced the viral genomes. We found a strong pattern of parallel evolution, where viral lineages from the same host were genetically more similar to each other than to lineages from other host species. When we compared viruses that had evolved in different host species, we found that parallel genetic changes were more likely to occur if the two host species were closely related. This suggests that when a virus adapts to one host it might also become better adapted to closely related host species. This may explain in part why host shifts tend to occur between related species, and may mean that when a new pathogen appears in a given species, closely related species may become vulnerable to the new disease.

evolutionary biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Sensitivity to sequencing depth in single-cell cancer genomics

BackgroundQuerying cancer genomes at single-cell resolution is expected to provide a powerful framework to understand in detail the dynamics of cancer evolution. However, given the high costs currently associated with single-cell sequencing, together with the inevitable technical noise arising from single-cell genome amplification, cost-effective strategies that maximize the quality of single-cell data are critically needed. Taking advantage of five published single-cell whole-genome and whole-exome cancer datasets, we studied the impact of sequencing depth and sampling effort towards single-cell variant detection, including structural and driver mutations, genotyping accuracy, clonal inference and phylogenetic reconstruction, using recent tools specifically designed for single-cell data.\n\nResultsAltogether, our results suggest that, for relatively large sample sizes (25 or more cells), sequencing single tumor cells at depths >5x does not drastically improve somatic variant discovery, the characterization of clonal genotypes or the estimation of phylogenies from single tumor cells.\n\nConclusionsWe demonstrate that sequencing many individual tumor cells at a modest depth represents an effective alternative to explore the mutational landscape and clonal evolutionary patterns of cancer genomes, without the excessively high costs associated with high-coverage genome sequencing.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2016

Biased evolutionary inferences from bulk tumor samples

It is generally agreed that tumors are composed of multiple cell clones defined by different somatic mutations. Characterizing the evolutionary mechanisms driving this intratumor genetic heterogeneity (ITH) is crucial to improve both cancer diagnosis and therapeutic strategies. For that purpose, recent ITH studies have focused on qualitative comparisons of mutational profiles derived from bulk sequencing of multiple tumor samples extracted from the same patient. Here, we show some examples where the naive use of bulk data in multiregional studies may lead to erroneous inferences of the evolutionary trajectories that underlie tumor progression, including biased timing of somatic mutations, spurious parallel mutation events, and/or incorrect chronological ordering of metastatic events. In addition, we analyze three real datasets to highlight how the use of bulk mutational profiles instead of inferred clones can lead to different conclusions about mutational recurrence and population structure.

evolutionary biology↗